don't think this will happen but we will see.Come on Apple, at least just appease us with a stop-gap Kaby Lake, AMD 400 series, Thunderbolt 3 iMac in March. Please. Please!
don't think this will happen but we will see.Come on Apple, at least just appease us with a stop-gap Kaby Lake, AMD 400 series, Thunderbolt 3 iMac in March. Please. Please!
It isn't and I know you are referring to the Surface line. However, Apple still is top dog in the design department, with others biting at their heals.
No, the graphics card failed. It's a known problem with that model covered by an extended warranty, but not extended enough to cover my computer. Would cost $800 to repair. Not worth it, I think.
Yes. I wish Apple, knowing those graphics cards had issues, had extended the warranty further. So, my iMac lasted 5 years. I would have hoped a little longer.This exact thing happened to me too, just a couple of weeks ago...
No, the graphics card failed. It's a known problem with that model covered by an extended warranty, but not extended enough to cover my computer. Would cost $800 to repair. Not worth it, I think.
That perhaps could be an option, I third party repair. The thing is, I had already decided to buy a new iMac (higher speed, 5K), and just wanted my current iMac to last until then. And then it breaks...That sounds like the problem I am having. A local apple shop said we can get the video card fixed for $125 from a place on ebay and he can do the repair for about the same. We finally got the card back and it didn't work. We are deciding now if we will give the ebay guy another chance to fix it (he said he could try) or just get the refund and move on. Move on as in new imac...
I would disagree, I think the Surface line is encouraging people to "think differently" about design and is creating a new way for people to interact with computers.
Apple's touch bar is not functional, if anything slows lots of people down, and annoys most consumers...
I saw my first touch bar MacBook Pro a few days ago, and I must say that it looks really ugly and dumb. I would pay extra for the regular function keys.
I would disagree, I think the Surface line is encouraging people to "think differently" about design and is creating a new way for people to interact with computers.
Apple's touch bar is not functional, if anything slows lots of people down, and annoys most consumers...
I think this is one reason why the 2015 MBP was selling so well - at least by what people posted in the MBP forums, opting for the 2015 model over the 2016I would rather go back to paying what I did last year.
I agree. Told shop to get refund, will buy a new one when they are released (hopefully when I get my tax refund)MacnCheese wrote:
"We are deciding now if we will give the ebay guy another chance to fix it (he said he could try) or just get the refund and move on. Move on as in new imac..."
Time to move on.
Stop throwing good money in after the bad.
So now that WWDC has already been announced and it's 4 months away, what do you guys think of the likelihood of the March event?
Do they ever announce another earlier event after the latest event announcement?
So now that WWDC has already been announced and it's 4 months away, what do you guys think of the likelihood of the March event?
Do they ever announce another earlier event after the latest event announcement?
So now that WWDC has already been announced and it's 4 months away, what do you guys think of the likelihood of the March event?
Very high. In recent years WWDC has more often not been a place to announce new Macs (even if I do think the MBP with TouchBar was supposed to be announced at WWDC last year).
If we do not see an iMac launch before WWDC, then that could be a sign the Mac Pro is dead and the iMac will be "up-spec'd" to replace it and announced / launched at WWDC.
Don't say that! Haha... I agree though, it isn't good news.
Come on Apple, at least just appease us with a stop-gap Kaby Lake, AMD 400 series, Thunderbolt 3 iMac in March. Please. Please!
Doesn't help my dreams for a triple-5K setup!From my reading of industry press releases there is only a minor gain from using Kaby Lake in Desktops. In fact the advice is that if you see a good deal with a Skylake CPU then go for it. The advances of KL are for mobile in power savings etc.
From my reading of industry press releases there is only a minor gain from using Kaby Lake in Desktops. In fact the advice is that if you see a good deal with a Skylake CPU then go for it. The advances of KL are for mobile in power savings etc.
I concur.its the Polaris GPU that is wanted. I don't think that many here are too bothered about kabylake.