Things in the GPU market 'hotting' up. A £150 cooler on the Ampere alone? :O
The good news is AMD Radeon have to compete and that puts pressure on prices.
What this means for iMac? Whilst Ampere in any iMac or Mac Pro any time soon...is unlikely...the purported 50% efficiency for the Big Navi 2 suggests a pitstop on the iMac Pro late 2020/early 2021 with the iMac to follow next year. (Though how this squares with the Mac ARM rumours next year...) Sure, the 'huuuuge' top end Navi 2 won't make it's way into an iMac perhaps. But there are other products in the Big Navi stack (AMD have officially said it's a full stack...unlike the low end Polaris and the 'mid-range' 5700XT...) that may be appropriate.
I'll have to contend with being grateful if they put the Navi 1 in there this year.
And I don't have a working Mac to wait it out. But I suspect this year, there will be other compensations than just a gpu update. The SSD, the design, the ram, perhaps a 32 inch screen (go on, Apple my san...get in there...) with 6k.
NVIDIA has allegedly begun an investigation into the GeForce RTX 3080 leak. NVIDIA PG132 board to launch with three graphics cards Igor Wallossek from Igor’sLAB has new information on Saturday’s leak of RTX 3080 cooler design. The company has allegedly started an investigation. Two...
videocardz.com
Azrael.
[automerge]1591706833[/automerge]
I don't drink. I win the game.
Neither do I...as a rule...
But upon occasion...and with 'good company'...
Azrael.
[automerge]1591707020[/automerge]
Why cant they just make a normal desktop like Mac Pro? All in one desktop has its limitation and most of them are using a mobile CPU because of that. iMac's cooling system is terrible as long as they keep AIO design.
Answers on a postcard to Tim Cook.
Just create a separate Power Computing brand for the 'tower' market. Mail order only. They could reach an entirely different set of users.
Won't happen though.
I'm very sympathetic to the Tower buyers in Mac land. It's very frustrating from their/my point of view.
The last time Apple appeared to take it seriously was in the G3-G5 era.
Azrael.
[automerge]1591707365[/automerge]
Personally, I'm not sure if having ARM chips as the main CPU in a mac is the best idea, and instead having them as a powerful co processor might make more sense? The Intel chips have much more complex instruction sets and pipelines that allow them to run a huge array of computing tasks in parallel that give a great desktop experience. I'm certain that if you tried to do the same with an A13 for example, running a full desktop OS it would bog down heavily. And if it said chip was 'scaled up' to be more desktop class, and in turn needed to be actively cooled, well your back to square one with how Intel chips are actively cooled!
You've got an idea there about using Mac ARM as a powerful co-processor.
Opening up 'Mac' to the entire library of the iOS software market could vastly increase Mac sales. It's super nova territory.
ARM chips are so cheap compared to Intel cpus...that they 'could' do this.
But Apple aren't a company to do things by 'half' even when they mis-step. They'll probably go all in on Mac ARM because for what they're paying INtel to use their cpus, they may as well run over clocked ARM chips and pocket the difference themselves.
I think if you put an A14X cpu in an iMac...for 9/10 things most users wouldn't notice. And you'd get a dramatic iMac 'Air' machine design out of that. I have high confidence that Intel is very vulnerable right now...and next year they're still going to run hot cpus and that's the time for Apple to strike with the A14X. It won't be pretty. For intel.
Losing Apple as a customer and the mindshare of losing Apple.
Azrael.