Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

When do you expect an iMac redesign?

  • 4rd quarter 2019

    Votes: 34 4.1%
  • 1st quarter 2020

    Votes: 23 2.8%
  • 2nd quarter 2020

    Votes: 119 14.5%
  • 3rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 131 15.9%
  • 4rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 172 20.9%
  • 2021 or later

    Votes: 343 41.7%

  • Total voters
    822
  • Poll closed .
You guys are making it though for me. Now I want the 5700 XT, so I can finally spend some time learning game development / improve my 3D modeling (rendering) skills...

3000 EUR for a computer... oh god.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
My question is the nano-glass. is that worth the $500 upgrade?

All depends on your setup I reckon. In my case behind me is a wall and windows in my office are behind the iMac (so I look out the windows when looking up from the display) - so I don't get big issues with reflections. If it was the other way around (windows behind me) I'd be getting the nano option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DrRadon and zhenya
My question is the nano-glass. is that worth the $500 upgrade?

To me that would depend on how big a deal glare is in the location you’ll have the iMac placed. I hate hate hate screen glare, but where my iMac is located, it’s not an issue. If it was, $500 would be a bargain considering I‘ll spend 8+ hours a day using it for 5+ years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9 and sco
My question is the nano-glass. is that worth the $500 upgrade?

I suppose easiest is to check it out in person in a apple store to feel the difference.

I don't think i need it (much less for 500€) since i have no glare issues with my MacBook Pro and my 2012 iMac were i set them up inside (MacBook or iPad outside, different story) while my TV, not magic apple glass but matt, dos have some hours in the afternoon were i just have to let down the shades if i want to see anything. (but this one is also 2013 so probably 10,5 nits or something).
 
More cores. More plug ins?

From the AMD hackintoshes that use more cores (check out YouTube...) the benching on Logic suggests having more cores can be a 'Good Thing.' TM.

I'd got the 10 core. 10 cores. 20 threads!

8 core? 16 threads.

Plus the i9 is 'a bit newer.'

You could go for the Tier 3 8 core/5500XT and upgrade the CPU on it. Keep the GPU as 5500XT and up the internal SSD to 1TB.

Azrael.

Ordered this config this morning (10core i9, 5500XT, will add 32GB Ram myself, 1TB) :) Going from a 2011 15" with GPU problems that I needed to melt back together every few months to this is going to feel great. May look into the laptop offerings of AS a couple of gens in but I am excited to get this!

Expecting it to come some point between 20th and 27th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
DrRadon - I did the same machine. For some reason, the 2 TB also drew me in, but I like to partition out for bootcamp, too. The maxed CPU and GPU is what sold me over the iMac Pro, which was also in competition, if for anything, the cooling and aesthetics. ;)

I do see others clamoring about improved cooling with the redesign, but I must have missed that in the marketing blasts. Would be great if they have it. I only notice my 2014 iMac getting noisy once in a blue moon, but when it does it reminds me of my Windows Gaming days, which used to prompt noise complaints from the lady friends. ha
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9 and DrRadon
Got mine the other day and it is a nice upgrade from my aging iMac. Not sure though if I am going to keep it. The 512gb ssd might be too small for me. I will say I have run into some issues but I believe that is due to Catalina as this is the first time I am using it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
finally an upgrade.

my needs have changed somewhat since 2014 when i got my last iMac (3.5 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i5) and these days all i really do is some light photo editing/managing, video stuff on a very small scale and some music editing on a small scale.

As much as I'd like to get the top of the line model, my needs probably don't require it and im leaning towards this: "
  • 3.3GHz 6-core 10th-generation Intel Core i5 processor

That will be a nice upgrade. All 10th-gen chips have SMT so that will be 6 cores / 12 threads versus 4 cores / 4 threads of your 2014 iMac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
So, as I understand from the very useful posts in this thread (thank you all! :) ) this is a very good upgrade for my 2017 3.8 580 iMac.

I think that I'll go with the 8 core 3.8 (3.8 again!), 5700 XT 16GB, 1tb SSD, 10GB Ethernet (for future proofing).
The 500 nano texture glass is yet an expensive option and unknown factor in general.

I would like to have the 10 core CPU but I worry a bit for the thermals. Do you think that it will be fine?
 
I would like to have the 10 core CPU but I worry a bit for the thermals. Do you think that it will be fine?
We'll have to wait for the first impressions, but my guess is the 10-core will be loud as hell under load.

They use Micron chip which is probably the best DRAM chip you can get.
Lots of no name brand third parties also use Micron. It's the QA that matters, not just the chips. In my experience good brands are like Crucial (Micron), Hynix, Samsung. These are the brands that actually make their own memory chips and have excellent QA, and these are the brands that Apple itself uses. Out of these three though, the easiest one to get at retail is Crucial. If not one of these, then you're on to companies like Kingston, etc.
 
We'll have to wait for the first impressions, but my guess is the 10-core will be loud as hell under load.
Thank you, this is what I'm afraid of.

Anyway, the nano texture option seems to be too demanding, it needs a $€£ 9 "special" Apple Cloth® to clean it and no water! This very special cloth will be provided after negotiations, it seems... :)

 
Lots of no name brand third parties also use Micron. It's the QA that matters, not just the chips. In my experience good brands are like Crucial (Micron), Hynix, Samsung. These are the brands that actually make their own memory chips and have excellent QA, and these are the brands that Apple itself uses. Out of these three though, the easiest one to get at retail is Crucial. If not one of these, then you're on to companies like Kingston, etc.
Yep. Exactly :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9
Isn't OWC very good too? Do you know if its Micron also, please?

We'll have to wait for the first impressions, but my guess is the 10-core will be loud as hell under load.


Lots of no name brand third parties also use Micron. It's the QA that matters, not just the chips. In my experience good brands are like Crucial (Micron), Hynix, Samsung. These are the brands that actually make their own memory chips and have excellent QA, and these are the brands that Apple itself uses. Out of these three though, the easiest one to get at retail is Crucial. If not one of these, then you're on to companies like Kingston, etc.
 
Okay, did some tests to check the performance. Keep in mind I bought the mid 27 and I haven't upgraded the RAM yet since I'm waiting for that to come in the mail.

View attachment 941202

View attachment 941203View attachment 941205

View attachment 941207

View attachment 941208

Rbfinch2. Congrats on your rig and arrival! You're giving Max a run for getting it in and benched!!!!

Highly respectable. You're performing as well as the 8 core Ryzen 7 on Cinebench(!), there...which caught a few plaudits.

Some very decent benches there. Ty very much for sharing!

...and catch those SSD speeds.....!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Your boot times...do you get neck whiplash?

Azrael.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sir grotius
Isn't OWC very good too? Do you know if its Micron also, please?
Can't tell :( On some pictures you can see the Micron logo, on others Hynix ... Hard to say. These companies just like Kingston or Corsair doesn't have one vendor. They use batches of DRAM chips according the the price they can get when they need it. So if one week Hynix is less expansive than Micron, the RAM sticks will have Hynix DRAM chips.

And they are always priced higher than Crucial.

But OWC is generally good. It's a geek thing to focus on Crucial and Micron (and I'm a bit geek). I like this brand, the QA they got, the reliability of their chips and it's a US-based company. This is why I prefer Crucial (Micron) over other brands. Kingston is another US-based company that I really like. High quality products, very well tested. In all the PCs I assembled in the past before going to software engineering (I used to be a IT tech before), I never never had a single defective Crucial or Kingston memory stick.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Freida and Azrael9
Isn't OWC very good too? Do you know if its Micron also, please?

OCW seem to have a good rep for Mac upgrades. Memory et al.

Think I'll be going Crucial. I'll have to get my order in otherwise pledisle will be smacking my bottom for having more gpu ram than system ram. *Teases.*

Azrael.
 
We'll have to wait for the first impressions, but my guess is the 10-core will be loud as hell under load.

My experiences of iMacs are they get hot under load. The 24 inch, I could have cooked an egg on it. The 27 inch blowed when ever you did more than one thing.

I'm in an attic studio room. So heat rises (especially on these British 'muggy' days...) and iMac can get 'warm' to the touch even if it doesn't do anything(!)

10 core. when I get mine. I'll do 3 passes of Cinebench and see if the fans kick up hairdryer mode.

Azrael.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.