Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

When do you expect an iMac redesign?

  • 4rd quarter 2019

    Votes: 34 4.1%
  • 1st quarter 2020

    Votes: 23 2.8%
  • 2nd quarter 2020

    Votes: 119 14.5%
  • 3rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 131 15.9%
  • 4rd quarter 2020

    Votes: 172 20.9%
  • 2021 or later

    Votes: 343 41.7%

  • Total voters
    822
  • Poll closed .

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835
The update did indeed fix my white line issue! The 'corner' glitch remains, but I barely ever notice that. Also I ran Novabench after update and my GPU score was 997, way higher than my pre-update 558 score.

Anthony13,

I'm glad it was fixed for you. And a nice performance boost too.

Azrael.
[automerge]1601292424[/automerge]

It's on its way?

Azrael.
 

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835

Quite the premium for 'a little more.'

Azrael.
 

pldelisle

macrumors 68020
May 4, 2020
2,248
1,506
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I thought we were getting A14zzz chips for the new Mac with the iPad Pro body? Are you telling me we have to wait another two years on this thread?
???
I'd say 1 year. Q3 or Q4 2021, with AS Mac Pro closing the transition with announcement June 2022 and release Q3-Q4 2022.

But we might see a 24 inch iMac with AS based on 5nm TSMC chip and A14 architecture later this fall or 1H 2021. A slightly higher clocked, more power hungry version of the next iPad Pro chip.
 

i'm the mac daddy

macrumors member
Jul 19, 2019
45
75
Massachusetts
???
I'd say 1 year. Q3 or Q4 2021, with AS Mac Pro closing the transition with announcement June 2022 and release Q3-Q4 2022.

But we might see a 24 inch iMac with AS based on 5nm TSMC chip and A14 architecture later this fall or 1H 2021. A slightly higher clocked, more power hungry version of the next iPad Pro chip.
I'd really like to see a 30" iMac with AS and 32-64 cores based on the iPad Pro look and have Apple Pencil, Touchscreen, and the ability to adjust it from almost flat to 120 degrees. I hope we're not waiting two more years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Azrael9

pldelisle

macrumors 68020
May 4, 2020
2,248
1,506
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
I'd really like to see a 30" iMac with AS and 32-64 cores based on the iPad Pro look and have Apple Pencil, Touchscreen, and the ability to adjust it from almost flat to 120 degrees. I hope we're not waiting two more years.
32 cores ? lol. Keep dreaming. If we get 16 in the next 3-4 years it will already be good enough.
 

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835
I thought we were getting A14zzz chips for the new Mac with the iPad Pro body? Are you telling me we have to wait another two years on this thread?

I'm not telling you anything. :p

Tim Cook and Apple have issued their own statement of up to two years for that transition. (Now heading towards 1 and a half years....)

The 1st AS Mac by the 'end of the year.'

...and based on yes, 'AS' (Apple Silicon.)

Whatever that means. They didn't give any specific chip title. Just a general banner 'Apple Silicon.'

The specs of which could be anything.

Only the iPhone and iPad offer clues. Along with the Bloomberg 'leaks' indicating the amount of cores we can expect...and the performance (circa 50-100% better as in 'up to...') we may anticipate.

It can't be any worse than it is now.

Hot. Unoptimised. Deprecated. Inefficient.

And expensive considering the above.

Azrael.
[automerge]1601475765[/automerge]
I'd really like to see a 30" iMac with AS and 32-64 cores based on the iPad Pro look and have Apple Pencil, Touchscreen, and the ability to adjust it from almost flat to 120 degrees. I hope we're not waiting two more years.

Well. Ofc we want that. :p

Azrael.
 

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835
???
I'd say 1 year. Q3 or Q4 2021, with AS Mac Pro closing the transition with announcement June 2022 and release Q3-Q4 2022.

But we might see a 24 inch iMac with AS based on 5nm TSMC chip and A14 architecture later this fall or 1H 2021. A slightly higher clocked, more power hungry version of the next iPad Pro chip.

Yes.

I just hope the iMac AS isn't the thermal prima donna the current Intel iMac is.

Azrael.
 

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835
Would highly doubt. ARM is way more efficient than x86. They don't have to be more performant from Intel that much, only more efficient. And they already are with TSMC 5 nm nodes.

If I could have similar performance without the 'touchy' Intel CPU and thermal issues, I'd swap right now.

Poor Intel CPU thermals, deprecated Open GL performance on last year's mid range gpu...it all seems rather unoptimised.

And Apple decided to not bother that much with a cooling solution for these performance 'monsters.'

Metal. AS. Native apps. New horizons.

It should get much better. More efficient. More optimised. A synergy of hardware and software.

But it underlines the sorry state of things as they are.

Still, Intel aren't the only ones with thermal issues. Check out the new Nvidia 3080. Thermal volcano and that's on .8nm.

Azrael.
 

pldelisle

macrumors 68020
May 4, 2020
2,248
1,506
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Metal is already very deployed across the OS. Just not the apps. But devs won't have choice soon to comply.

Thermal volcano and that's on .8nm.

It runs hot because they wanted it to run hot. Haven't you seen the number of CUDA cores and tensor cores on this thing ? Ampere is phenomenal, nothing less. They made a big chip, bigger than anything we have ever seen and more powerful and anything previously existing, even in HPC world. This chip redefines the definition of a GPU. It's not a GPU anymore, it's a fully fledged accelerator running its own highly optimized software API. This is the definition of pure symbiose between software and hardware for high performance computing.

Yes, maybe AMD might be more efficient, run cooler, but will never be able to surpass Ampere 3080 and 3090 in term of performance and features.
 

Azrael9

macrumors 68020
Apr 4, 2020
2,287
1,835
Metal is already very deployed across the OS. Just not the apps. But devs won't have choice soon to comply.



It runs hot because they wanted it to run hot. Haven't you seen the number of CUDA cores and tensor cores on this thing ? Ampere is phenomenal, nothing less. They made a big chip, bigger than anything we have ever seen and more powerful and anything previously existing, even in HPC world. This chip redefines the definition of a GPU. It's not a GPU anymore, it's a fully fledged accelerator running its own highly optimized software API. This is the definition of pure symbiose between software and hardware for high performance computing.

Yes, maybe AMD might be more efficient, run cooler, but will never be able to surpass Ampere 3080 and 3090 in term of performance and features.

It will be 'phenomenal' when then can do that on less Watts. And not until.

There's no doubting Ampere's power. But it runs hot, it's inefficient and I think that's poor for .8nm.

The same computing press initially gushing over Ampere were the same ones putting the boot into AMD's Radeon when it was running in the late 200s watts. Fair's fair.

I like the Ray Tracing. And the broadcast tech'.

But they 'just had to win' at? 'Any cost.'

Because they knew RDNA2 was coming. And that if they didn't put it on the 'edge' thermally (like Intel's CPUs...) they were going to lose, perhaps.

Let's hope for? Some semblance of competition. And some pricing rational counter balance.


It's back to the old leaf blower days.

Azrael.
 

pldelisle

macrumors 68020
May 4, 2020
2,248
1,506
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Nvidia were never recognized for their efficiency and performance per watt. But, they were always recognized for their "get the work done as fast as possible". That's exactly what Ampere is.

I personally don't worry about thermals for Ampere. Such a GPU is supposed to run hot. It's made to run hot and extensively. My RTX 2080 have been running for months at TJunction (87 degrees) continuously despite incredible air flow (8 Noctua case fan running full blown) and still run perfectly fine. Temperature for such GPUs isn't a problem.

AMD just need to release a more efficient RDNA2 chip. I don't think they can beat a 3090, but 3080 is definitively reachable at maybe lower power consumption. As always, the goal of AMD isn't to release an Nvidia-killer GPU. The goal is always to release a more efficient and lower priced one.
 

fireguy286

macrumors 6502a
Sep 15, 2014
659
737
NY'er in Philly
The tea leaves of the next chapter of Apple are taking shape. The notion of T2 or later are becoming the line in the sand. (been mused for some time, but interesting see it to fruition)

 

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,528
11,545
Seattle, WA
The tea leaves of the next chapter of Apple are taking shape. The notion of T2 or later are becoming the line in the sand. (been mused for some time, but interesting see it to fruition)

Requiring a T2 does improve playback performance since the SoC handles both video decoding and DRM decoding compared to doing it in software like Windows.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pldelisle

fireguy286

macrumors 6502a
Sep 15, 2014
659
737
NY'er in Philly
Requiring a T2 does improve playback performance since the SoC handles both video decoding and DRM decoding compared to doing it in software like Windows.

This is debatable at best and not entirely accurate for Windows either. There's good discussion on the actual article for that topic.
 

pldelisle

macrumors 68020
May 4, 2020
2,248
1,506
Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Well... hope Apple has some stocks of 5700.....
 

Homy

macrumors 68030
Jan 14, 2006
2,511
2,463
Sweden

Well... hope Apple has some stocks of 5700.....
It says that not even custom GPUs are going to be produced. It can only mean that Apple is going to upgrade iMac with Radeon 6000 or introduce the first AS iMac soon. Feel bad for those who have bought 5700 XT seeing it being replaced so soon.
 

filmak

macrumors 65816
Jun 21, 2012
1,418
777
between earth and heaven
It says that not even custom GPUs are going to be produced. It can only mean that Apple is going to upgrade iMac with Radeon 6000 or introduce the first AS iMac soon. Feel bad for those who have bought 5700 XT seeing it being replaced so soon.
Apple may have already the estimated needed parts in stock?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.