Black arguably would have been worse with these colors. Wish they had been able to color-match the aluminum, but I am guessing they tried and it looked even worse (different shade and texture).
Its literally don on iPhone. With both Black and the back color involved.
So are 3/4 of the iPhones Bezel.I doubt the bezel on the iMac is aluminum. It is probably glass.
So are 3/4 of the iPhones Bezel.
It needs to be called Pro. It has to "look" much different. This might have the power due to M1, but it feels like a family computer.I wonder if they'll tease the 27/30/32 at the end. something about this entire presentation makes me wonder if the larger model will be called iMac Pro.
Ah, the time has come to start the "BUT THEY DONT SHOW HARDWARE AT WWDC OFTEN!!!" debate of every year.So now that we are on iPad Pro...
My belief is even stronger the 32" will be the "iMac Pro" and will now be announced at WWDC with the 14" MacBook Pro and 16" MacBook Pro.
And it's not going to be cheap.
My Apple Card is ready.
Ah, the time has come to start the "BUT THEY DONT SHOW HARDWARE AT WWDC OFTEN!!!" debate of every year.
iMac Pro in Fall. They just released a 27 incher, there is nothing going on software wise yet for ARM. Would not get my hopes up, happy to have bought the Intel version.
Make it an iPad Pro with Magic Keyboard and you get touch input on top of everything.I really like the new iMac. Only gripe is that it is going to be $1499 minimum to 16GB of RAM.
Also, as badly as I want one, it would be hard to buy it over just getting an M1 MacBook Air. Cheaper, same performance for almost all real world tasks, and much more flexibility.
There literally is no reason not to allow MacOS on this iPad Pro but "we want you to buy a laptop as well LOL"
This is one of the reasons Jason Snell said they would not call the iPad Pro's SoC the M1, but instead the A14X - "If they do, people will say 'let it run macOS, cowards'."