hypothetically, if the delay with 27" is really due to the panels then that means that if the new ones are ready then there will be no bigger screen than 27" so maybe not even redesign (although that is not implied).
I sincerely hope that the delay is not panel shortage but the fact that the 27 will get redesigned and bumped to 29-32 or so and the 21 is ok because it will be budget option. (no redesign there).
24 will be introduced so now we will have 21" budget, 24 & ±30 as mid and high option. All classes and customers happy and all good. That would be amazing
Air, mid, high
Makes sense to me.
I'd like to see Apple return to the UK's historical iMac price points of the 'Bondi' iMac era. Where you could get an iMac from £595 (£565?), £799 and £999. Far better value than the mini, historically. You get a screen, k/b, mouse, great design, cpu power and graphics for less than £1k. They weren't the cheapest, but they were really going for it, market and mindshare....and fighting for their survival. Tellingly.
21 inch. £599 inc VAT.
24 inch. £799 inc VAT.
30 inch. £1500 inc VAT.
(Entry model starting prices.)
Redesign? To design or not to design. In the last several years, Apple has come under increasing pressure from PC computer makers in terms of M$ and HP and even Dell (yes, I know...) who are showing that progressive design (Surface 2 is gorgeous), bang for buck (HP AiO...they did a good job on that...with great value specs and performance and not sacrificing spec for thinness...) and Dell (teh very slender bezels...and monitors that can rotate to portrait...)
The Mac Pro display offered a tantalising olive branch of promise of 'what could be' coming for the iMac Pro/iMac. The iMac used to be the flagship of innovative design AND value. Now? It's not really either. Just a staid evolutionary example of tired design with mediocre specs at a pricey point.
The iMac is all about the screen. So 32 inches of dream worthy 6k resolution that could rotate to portrait would have me at 'Hello.' With that space and thickness you can get 'iMac Pro' serious about specs...with superior cooling.
If good value £2k and 'I have to saw someone's arm off for it' £3k uber value HP AiO style specs land? It will be a return to greatness.
A specced bump 27 incher isn't going to cut it.
Both the Mac Pro and Mac Pro display show that Apple isn't beaten yet...on desktops.
It's time to kick Az.
Azrael.
[automerge]1589214982[/automerge]
I'm more interested in vertical height, which is my greater constraint. I suspect most people have to scroll vertically more often than horizontally (websites, word processing, coding, etc.), so there would be a benefit for many. I'd love the 3:2 ratio of the Microsoft Surface Studio 2, but 16:10 has more chance as this has been used on many Apple screens, and is still used on all their laptops. 30" 16:10 5120x3200 comes to mind as a retina version of the biggest Cinema Display (I may already have mentioned it in this thread, I certainly have on Mac Rumors). 16:10 was on my 24" iMac, part of why I loved it so much.
True. Vertical height is important. I loved my iMac 24 incher.
That said, give me that 32 inch 6k iMac display...and the ability to turn it to portrait.
Azrael.
[automerge]1589215090[/automerge]
Me too, me too. The iPhone 12 info from Prosser helped a bit. Knowing the base models are 128GB cheered me up slightly, haha. I'm sad, let me be!
128 gig? More SSD than the Fusion drive iMac?
*refreshes.
Azrael.
PS. I take it you've all seen this iMac concept model?
Apple has launched a new iMac with a new design, larger 4.5K display, M1 chip and a choice of seven colours. Here's what you need to know.
www.macworld.co.uk