Design is extremely important to Apple. So much so that they wrote a book about it ( Apple Store link to Designed by Apple in California ), and the first product mentioned in the store description is the iMac.
The iMac is iconic to Apple. It is also probably the product most open to inventive design as it is not restricted in form factor by the need for transportability, and that has been used to great effect in the past. The iMac G4 is probably my favourite piece of design ever. To have the iMac stagnate for so long does not look good, it makes Apple appear ordinary.
If Apple uses the LG 23.7" Ultrafine 4K display for iMac 23" we can get great performance in games. Its resolution is 3840 x 2160 which means you can run games in native 1080p without loosing sharpness. With the current iMac 21" you have to run games in 1152p since its resolution is 4096 x 2304 and with the 27" you have to run games in 1440p. A 23" with Radeon 5500 may be great, not having to buy a 27" for good gaming performance.
Don’t trust this person, but.. still no larger size. It’s a no from me, I’m out. Excluding that though, it could be a good upgrade, IF TRUE. All comes down to the cooling.
We have no idea. I wouldn’t trust them at all tbh. They have no track record.How credible is this leaker?
That would mean lower DPI compared to the current 21.5 inch model. It would fit the 23 inch being a cheaper model. Then it has to be the 27 inch for me.If Apple uses the LG 23.7" Ultrafine 4K display for iMac 23" we can get great performance in games. Its resolution is 3840 x 2160 which means you can run games in native 1080p without loosing sharpness. With the current iMac 21" you have to run games in 1152p since its resolution is 4096 x 2304 and with the 27" you have to run games in 1440p. A 23" with Radeon 5500 may be great, not having to buy a 27" for good gaming performance.
We are so similar its not even funny. I didn't get 2019 iMac because it was a good update.
I also didn't get the iPad because it was weak and the bending issue is preventing me also. Its just too 'fragile' for my liking.
I didn't get £2000 iPhone though as it was just too much and I don't really like the iPhone 11 Pro so I got the new SE.
Hoping the coming iMac will be worth the wait so I can use the extra money I didn't spend on a phone to put into beefier iMac
I bought mine refurbished from Apple last summer, i9+V48+1tbSSD. When I use it to game it can spin the fans quite a bit and much of this is from CPU spikes. As in it is quick to spin the fans but loathe to bring them back down rapidly
I never had any bending issue personally. I had an iPhone 5 (which lasted 5 years, I tend to keep my things pretty long, 6+years for my actual MacBook Pro 15), iPhone 8 Plus (best iPhone I ever had, indestructible, high quality, beautiful looking) and changed it for iPhone XR because it was on discount at Black Friday with my local provider (was more advantageous to sell my 8 Plus 400 CAD and get the discounted XR, which is very nice too, and red ?).
That would mean lower DPI compared to the current 21.5 inch model. It would fit the 23 inch being a cheaper model. Then it has to be the 27 inch for me.
[automerge]1590680189[/automerge]Peas in a Mac Pod.
I had the iPhone 4 (Timeless design....and gave it to my Mum and still using it...), the iPhone 5...(decent phone...) and finally the 6S Max... I then thought, what am I doing? I'm handing thousands over to Apple for incremental improvements. ie. Got to to have the lastest 'syndrome.' So I gave myself a good talking to. Lol. I certainly would not give Apple £1k for 'a phone.' I guess I'm in the 'new SE' class of buyer. Which is (I feel) the Apple I remember in terms of value. It doesn't have to be a £99 or £199 iPhone. But anything around £399 would be my limit these days. I'd rather put the rest into a new iMac. ie. As per your closing comment. So I could spec out better gpu or ram or ssd on the iMac (when it drops...)
Yes. After the 'bend gate' on the iPhone, you'd think Apple would have learned their lesson with the 'bendy' iPad. Didn't they stress test it in the lab? How did it get past quality control? Other than that? It's superb piece of kit, tablet wise but they didn't drape themselves in glory with the recent 'update.' I was expecting them to really pile on the pressure to the competition with the A14X. But as we've seen with Intel, AMD, Nvidia, Apple and others...corporations that don't have enough pressure or competition...
...give out the updates Apple has this year.
At least they really boosted the SE (and the iPhones) value proposition. I'd like to see them extend that rational to the Mac line and the new iMac. A machine I remember being about value, performance...'for the rest of us.'
Azrael.
I know but I don't mind since I'm using a 21.5" from 2011 with 1920x1080 resolution. I rather take better gaming than higher DPI.
Anyone from these forums buying iMac now for full price is totally insane. Unless you get a good deal then you shouldn't buy anything till WWDC. ;-)
Whaaatt??? Is it true?? Would love if they had space grey option though.
Pretty much. Announcement at WWDC with shipping next week (July) so its all aligned.
I don't think they will do stand redesign but the reduced chin and bezels are awesome. I think in Space grey it will look amazing
That would be a very good machine, hopefully we get them at these starting prices:
I think these are reasonable prices but we all know it will cost more. Probably I will go for a 23-inch max CPU & GPU specs with 16 of RAM and 512 SSD with a second 23-24" monitor.
- 23-inch: $1,199
- 27-inch: $1,699
It might just be a guy from this forum trying to trolling us ?
I don´t see that at all. Theres the 13 inch rocking a 10th gen. If apple wants it, apple gets it. It's more of a question if apple already wanted it when it was preparing the iMac for March. I am hoping we at least see 10th gen as a BTO upsell.
You are probably right. If "low" = "nothing", the supply is low overall. I was more interested in "not released until 28/5" than actual stock. I hope Apple have good access to these.
It was a very poor update in terms of CPU and GPU power. One of the meh-rist iPad updates ever.
But where's the meat and potatoes?
It's a sign *(that Apple needs more competition...) A12 series production is now good enough that they can use all the cores *(Azrael insert: 'Stifles laugh. Tries to behave...) Plus the A12 series already crushes every other ARM CPU *(Azrael insert, so we sit on our laurels...and...) on the market and looks like it can run with a number of non-ARM CPUs, as well, so honestly, how much more do you need? *(Azrael insert. MOAR! More than a two year old CPU. UNLIMITED POW-URRR!)
That will be the 2021 iPad Pro with MiniLED and an A13X to appease the Benchmark Junkies.
I had iPhone 4 then got iPhone 6 and now SE 2020. I did try the 11 Pro but it was awfully overpriced for the value you get. On everyday usage you don't really notice much difference except the huge screen which I don't really like because its OLED. And don't get me started on the bloody notch
Yeah, Apple wants us to believe that we need the latest and greatest but because smartphones have plateaued there is no longer the greatest. Its just latest these days and Apple certainly shows the lack of care in their products. The updated iPad Pro few weeks ago was a prime example of that behaviour.
So, big hopes for iMac upgrade (someone promised substantial - which to me means that Apple will come and say: "Ok guys, we will give you 1 year old GPU instead of 2 year old one )
They might also say : "one more thing - ok, SSD 128gb as standard" *(Azrael insert. It used to be on the Fusion Drive... )
Its a joke, really but its what it is. *(Azrael insert. Indeed.)
The best we can do is to vote with the wallet and submit feedback. In the end, it will bite Apple eventually. No company can stay on the top for too long and Apple will be no exception. One day they will get the kick in the butt they really need and on that day we might get them working hard again.
iMac at WWDC = better be massive thing if they are saving it for WWDC and they also hinted it at the invitation. Otherwise, why not just do it now if its as crappy as the Mac mini
I really miss those days 10 or so years ago. *(Azrael insert. Fond times...*remembers Steve.) Things were exciting and more innovative than now.
The success of iPhone kinda ruined it all for us as the attention is now on that. Mac pro could tell stories *(Azrael Insert. 'Where's my 8 core, i9, Radeon 5700XT (POWER) Mac Pro at the £2k-£2.5k price point...?)
[automerge]1590680189[/automerge]
P.S.: I really hope iMac will get option for 5700XT as that looks like a solid GPU (in Apple's world) *(Azrael insert: YES!)
That is outright seduction. *Throws his wallet on the Apple altar as a blood sacrificial offering...
*Places order right now.
What? It's just a rumour?
Bah.
You see, folks? With Apple...it's all about the dance...
Azrael.
All this was relevant, but, unfortunately, most likely in the past. Why? Because for 8 years the design has not changed. Not only external, but also internal. That is, if you take the normal life span, then about 4 years, in my opinion, Apple does not care.Design is extremely important to Apple.
The iMac is iconic to Apple. It is also probably the product most open to inventive design as it is not restricted in form factor by the need for transportability, and that has been used to great effect in the past.
By analogy with Vega 20, the iMac 21.5 / 23 probably will have the same GPU as the MBP 16". 5500 is a great card, but still far from playable for actual games in high settings. It depends on games, but I wouldn’t be so happy prematurely, because judging by according to tests, even the old Starcraft 2 on the MBP 16" in 1080p does not work at maximum settings comfortly. And judging by the reviews, some games look acceptable on a 4K display in 1080p resolution, and some are not. I don’t know what it depends on, but there is one.If Apple uses the LG 23.7" Ultrafine 4K display for iMac 23" we can get great performance in games. Its resolution is 3840 x 2160 which means you can run games in native 1080p without loosing sharpness. With the current iMac 21" you have to run games in 1152p since its resolution is 4096 x 2304 and with the 27" you have to run games in 1440p. A 23" with Radeon 5500 may be great, not having to buy a 27" for good gaming performance.
Where did the rumor go that display 27 should increase?Don’t trust this person, but.. still no larger size. It’s a no from me, I’m out. Excluding that though, it could be a good upgrade, IF TRUE. All comes down to the cooling.
But when you run games in 4K / 5K on powerful hardware and they work great - it’s immediately breathtaking and you don’t really want to go back for a quarter of the resolution.I think you're right.
The dpi difference will be negligible to the trade off in superior gaming experience you will receive.
It's still a '4k' screen give or take. Plenty of res' for productivity work. Better than my late 2012 27 inch iMac at any rate.
Azrael.
you got prosser, the guy with unprecedented access to Apple, telling us the iMac has been ready to ship, you got that other guy that is reliable tweeting iMac and mac mini „soon“ around that timeframe, you got a the verge Writer suggesting that something is happening soon... but the unknown guy with a thousand followers posting a mock-up image that he used many times before giving you playboy like fan fiction specs and looks telling that the release will happen not in June but in July...
like, lets be real here. What would this mean? Did Apple complete disassemble the March release to build a wet dream? I don’t know how trust worthy this Twitter account is. Scrolling through it a bit I have seen no „first reported here“ news that turned out to be true.
By analogy with Vega 20, the aimak 21.5 / 23 probably will have the same GPU as the MBP 16". 5500 is a great card, but still far from playable for actual games in high settings. It depends on games, but I wouldn’t be so happy prematurely, because judging by according to tests, even the old Starcraft 2 on the MBP 16" in 1080p does not work at maximum settings comfortly. And judging by the reviews, some games look acceptable on a 4K display in 1080p resolution, and some are not. I don’t know what it depends on, but there is one.
Yes, but let's not forget that MBP has 5300M/5500M, the mobile GPU. iMacs have had desktop GPUs the past years with better performance.
Sorry to burst the hype train. I am looking forward to the "new iMac' (whatever may or may not happen) as much as the next guy, but this was a mock-up in a 9to5mac 23inch monitor poll in April. (With one enlarged a bit)
View attachment 919446
*Sad face
I had iPhone 4 then got iPhone 6 and now SE 2020. I did try the 11 Pro but it was awfully overpriced for the value you get. On everyday usage you don't really notice much difference except the huge screen which I don't really like because its OLED. And don't get me started on the bloody notch
Yeah, Apple wants us to believe that we need the latest and greatest but because smartphones have plateaued there is no longer the greatest. Its just latest these days and Apple certainly shows the lack of care in their products. The updated iPad Pro few weeks ago was a prime example of that behaviour.
Sorry to burst the hype train. I am looking forward to the "new iMac' (whatever may or may not happen) as much as the next guy, but this was a mock-up in a 9to5mac 23inch monitor poll in April. (With one enlarged a bit)
View attachment 919446
*Sad face