Just release it already apple wtf
it is still like a month away ugh
it is still like a month away ugh
Last edited:
You seem to always pick the negative one which confuses me.
Sorry to burst the hype train. I am looking forward to the "new iMac' (whatever may or may not happen) as much as the next guy, but this was a mock-up in a 9to5mac 23inch monitor poll in April. (With one enlarged a bit)
View attachment 919446
*Sad face
I love this concept !!! Really it should be what Apple should do. But I doubt it's going to be this ahah !It is a concept, but one is not enlarged. The concept showed it in 2 sizes to match the current iMac range. More images (including the one with 2 iMacs) and a video here for a really nice design: https://www.yankodesign.com/2020/03...-be-the-design-template-for-the-new-imac-pro/
I think the Twitter post just used the image to attract attention, not to say this is how it will look, but it would be nice if it did (apart from the stand being too high, even with the range of adjustment available).
Sorry to burst the hype train. I am looking forward to the "new iMac' (whatever may or may not happen) as much as the next guy, but this was a mock-up in a 9to5mac 23inch monitor poll in April. (With one enlarged a bit)
View attachment 919446
*Sad face
Send it to Tcook mailI just did a mock up for fun with space grey.
One of my flatmates once said, your Phone is like a toaster, it already dos anything you will ever need it to do, you never NEED a new one.
Current GPUs are mobile GPUs. And everything in the past have been mobile GPU with far lower TDP than the desktop variant. It's usually custom made SKUs (680MX, Radeon M290X, Radeon Pro 580X) with slightly higher TDP than the true mobile counterpart, but still lower than a full desktop 580 for example.
The only one getting full power GPUs is the iMac Pro.
It'll be worth the wait..... 32 inch beauty please!Just release it already apple wtf
it is still like a month away ugh
I’ll try to clarify the situation.Thanks for pointing that out! I had to check that again since I have read on several sites and in reviews during the past years that iMac 2017 and 2019 use desktop GPUs. The M has always been an indicator of mobile GPUs but when I check Techpowerup it says "a professional mobile graphics chip" about all current GPUs in iMac, like Radeon Pro 580x, Vega 48, 56, 64. So where do you find the info about iMac Pro having desktop GPU? According to Techpowerup RX Vega 56 and 64 are desktop cards but iMac Pro uses Pro Vega not RX.
Still I would think that the mobile GPUs in iMac can be clocked faster because of the larger chassi and better thermal cooling compared to MBP.
Dude if all you need is a specs bump why you here? Just up-spec an iMac and move on with your life and the design you're happy with. Life's too short! Don't harsh on the folks that want something more.In your perception. I would be perfectly fine with "just a specs bump" as my only desire in getting a new iMac (wich i need, as my 2012 model crashes Premiere so fast with my A7M3 Footage) and not paying 4k on release that is more than a year old. To me "just a specs bump" is nothing negative. Contrary, it might actually be a positive in price and functionality as i personally much prefer my 2015 MBP with different ports to the redesign it shipped with 2017 and that just recently got a persistent hardware bug of the "newer and thinner" fixed. (keyboard, ESC key) I also preferred the first SE much to the new SE just based on the fact that it is smaller and i don't desire a bigger phone. I like a small phone with the power that allows me to run current Apps and a Camera that takes ok pictures.
Like, i don't need a newly designed iMac that has only ports that nobody uses until this "very first newly designed iMac" actually is dated again like it seems to be the case with the MBP (i write this literally minutes after having been handed a very common, classic, fat usb stick to print something).
I don't need to buy a extra wireless charger to finally have a iPhone that had no holes in it anymore so i can listen to music on BT headphones. Maybe if they get to the point were it actually charges over wifi it and BT headphones are awesome and don't cost 150-200€... maybe i am down than. But now i don't need it. What I need stuff that works.
So i am not negative at all whenever i discover another strong hint that there won't be a redesign. I am actually quite exited since i am reasonably scared that a redesign actually might lead to major drawbacks at a higher price. Also i need that machine and since i will need to go BTO i will still have to wait an extra 3-4 weeks till it arrives... so the prospect of it dropping next Wednesday also is exiting to me. That excitement is probably the only reason i was able to come up with that date based on the info we have as no one else wants to see it.
Dude if all you need is a specs bump why you here? Just up-spec an iMac and move on with your life and the design you're happy with. Life's too short! Don't harsh on the folks that want something more.
Dude if all you need is a specs bump why you here? Just up-spec an iMac and move on with your life and the design you're happy with. Life's too short! Don't harsh on the folks that want something more.
Nobody is harsh.
I have explained it to you before.
See? Its not just me. So yeah, be optimistic and positive otherwise whats the point? :-D
Pixel to pixel distance is 27 um larger on the 23,7 inch 4K display compared to the 5K 27 inch. However it translates to 25 %longer distance. Will that be visible ? Biggest problem I have with my old thunderbolt displays compared with my MBP retina display is the the resolution. Text is much clearer on the MBP. No gaming here. I may like a 23,7 inch because it takes up less space. However, I think the 27 inch bezel shrinks will make it less bulky.I know but I don't mind since I'm using a 21.5" from 2011 with 1920x1080 resolution. I rather take better gaming than higher DPI.
In any really good fake news, there is a grain of truth. What is true and false? Mockups - no truth whatsoever while the release date and specs are very plausible but with no surprises. A leaked image must look like crap to be believable. The interesting part is the 23 inch and the discontinuation of the 21.5 inch.Current GPUs are mobile GPUs. And everything in the past have been mobile GPU with far lower TDP than the desktop variant. It's usually custom made SKUs (680MX, Radeon M290X, Radeon Pro 580X) with slightly higher TDP than the true mobile counterpart, but still lower than a full desktop 580 for example.
The only one getting full power GPUs is the iMac Pro.
[automerge]1590685397[/automerge]
Yep. This rumour is totally fake.
Me too, but just so I can dual screen with two 32in monitors!I'd really like a 32" as that allows us dual screen types to go to just the one screen, but hey, if its an around about 27" 5K or 6K then I won't complain. The only, um, issue with higher pixel counts is the GPU; and that is a big question mark on any upcoming iMac. Whatever the screen is I'll definitely up-spec it to the very best card available.
Knowing me and my buying pattern and work/hobbies.100900 10/20 core (or 8/16), 32 Gb RAM, GPU mid range (no gamer). 2-4 Tb SSD. It should last me for 10 years. Probably a 27 inch. Noise levels is importantWhat kind of specs are you going to take? I'm thinking of something like 10600K 6 core / 12 threads and top GPU, like 5700 PRO. SSD would be 512gb-1tb depending on the prices and I'm hoping that the RAM can be changed at home. If not, I'm ordering with 32gb no matter the cost.
I'm hoping that this setup would not cost over 3000 euros. This can be, if the SSD prices go down from current configurations and the RAM is not too expensive. I would use the machine for video editing, music production (basic, at home) and some gaming.