I don’t like iCloud Photos anyway, from the start. I got a NAS drive and set it up to automatically store all my photos from my iPhone, tablet and Mac. I also keep all my music there and can access it from any device. iCloud photos put all my photos on every device in the photo app and if I delete the photos I don’t want on my phone they get deleted everywhere. It is a hot mess, that I just decided early on to not even use it and used my own NAS drive. It is less hassle.
What did you get and how does the photo sync and music access work, like when you’re remote? Companion app for music playback and photo upload?
It's not about being google, Android isn't anywhere near as polished as iOS, as long as google keeps giving out android to anyone who wants it, it'll continue to be a fragmented mess.
Oh yeah, Apple is *so* polished. They’ll create software to scan for this criminal activity, but their swype keyboard to this day still doesn’t understand context of a sentence being typed so that the word ‘and’ can be swyped. That’s not something I ever had issues with on Android.
Personally we as a country have lost the plot when it comes to privacy, the FBI got clearance for spying on the American people after Waco, after 911 spying on people became normal, to where no one batted an eye when it was found out that the NSA was spying on everyone, the government got the ability to hold any civilian for any length of time by simply saying they're a possible terrorist with no proof needed.
To be fair, I think England is spying on their people pretty hard, too.
So because 1 in 1-trillion will suffer from Apple seeing 30 of their "innocent photos", then we shouldn't care about the thousands of CSAM files being shared by sickos?
I respect you for moving away from a platform you don't like, but I don't think anyone is going to "suffer" with odds like that.
Those odds are nonsense. There are people on Reddit who have already interacted with this feature from a programming perspective and have fooled it into falsely alerting to completely innocuous images.
Pretty good compromise in my opinion. If it catches the sickos with this stuff, it's okay with. me. I'll take my 1 in a trillion chances of potentially having 30 innocent images looked at by Apple.
That’s just it - there is nothing about catching the people who view this stuff that stops the people who make it. That’s like saying going after heroin users will stop cartels in Asia that are producing heroin. They‘re not related activities other than they‘re both about heroin (or child porn).
Apple could easily avoid such worries by blindly trusting photos coming from the iPhone's own camera, letting them into iCloud without the CSAM check. Apple allegedly only wants to find copies of the known CSAM pictures from NCMEC, and photos that were just created via the camera cannot be such pictures. Not only would this alleviate many privacy concerns - picture you take yourself will never be checked - it would also reduce the load on the iPhone and minimize false positives. I wonder why Apple does not do that. Almost as if they are interested in more than just the database pictures after all.
Problem is, sickos would outsmart that by simply taking photos of print outs (or the images being viewed on another display) of known CSAM images. Voila - instant end run around the tactic.
The scanning and matching is done locally on the device, but Apple has already stated that for this to work, one must use icloud photos. Apple won't be able to access locally stored photos at this time, at least as per the report that is public. Once a photo is flagged, Apple's human review team will be able to access a copy that is on their icloud server for review.
And that’s as simple as…
If iCloud.enabled == False && GovernmentSaysScanStuffAnyway == True
BeginScanningAnyway
IOW the issue is them having the accepted ability to poke around the user’s device, regardless of how they say they’ll use it or how it will be limited. Do you think that terrorist suspect whose phone the government wanted into, but Apple couldn’t get the government access to, would go down the same way with this new device-side scanning in place? I doubt it. Apple would simply say “government says so and we told you we’d cooperate with local government…” and away they’d scan.