I see little point in arguing with these non-issue claimers than to disprove their baseless claims for the rest of the readers of this thread who care about this issue and will see this post. These non-issue claimers have a few things in common: 1) I can guarantee that they haven’t kept up with half, let alone the majority of the posts in this thread. 2) They will ignore the posts with evidence that disprove their claims and will continue to push their narrative. 3) Apple will personally be sending them a pair of Airpods Max for Christmas, free of charge for their valiant defence of Apple products.
I’ve made a number of posts about these IPhone display issues in this thread, and it’s getting boring repeating myself, as I know it is for some of you. But what can we do when the important posts get lost behind page numbers of threads, to be read once for a day or 2 then never again. What effect does this have? Well it causes these self proclaimed Apple Geniuses to be geniuses and appear oblivious to an almost 200 page thread of people discussing display issues. Yes, there are display issues if somehow you hadn’t noticed yet. Whether people notice/care about them is another question, which has been stated many times here. There are different groups of people who align with different opinions on this issue. Some people will just not notice it. Maybe they’re coming from an old iPhone or old Android and automatically assume new = better. Some sorry souls who do notice it might even see this as innovation and run with it, claiming that less blue light is better for our eyes, as if a feature called night shift with a colour temperature slider wasn’t invented for that exact purpose in mind. These might be the same people who claim that the yellow tint is intended because they have it in their minds that Apple can do no wrong. Yes, these people exist. Their eye catching keynotes and polished commercials could sway the masses to believe this. I’d also blame the reviewers who love to push the narrative that iPhones are the phones that “just work”. Yes, these phones are generally easy and great to use, but now we’ve got people thinking they’re flawless. Then we have a group of people who will notice the issue, but won’t care enough to flag it as an issue. They would rather just get used to it or use a workaround like colour tinting and be content with the decrease in brightness they would achieve as a side effect of doing this. This might be an acceptable compromise for some, but for those who paid a premium for a feature that is exclusive to the Pro lineup of iPhones, are well within their right to feel annoyed when they lose it because of an incorrectly calibrated display that bothers them. Then we have people who notice the issue, who aren’t necessarily power users but would like their display to look right, which I feel most people in this thread comprise of. Then there would be power users who give us their colorimeter/spectrophotometer readings for d65 white point and RGB greyscale. Yes these posts exist, and if you’d taken the time to actually read through the thread, you would have seen the variances in the RGB greyscale for affected displays, exhibiting muted blues and raised greens with varying reds which creates this tint for users.
Users having to exchange their phone 3, 4, 5+ times isn’t normal. But you have to question why it has got to that stage. Don’t give me no “it was intended that way”, as there have been many posts from users here explaining that their exchanged phone has been a clear improvement over their original, which just reiterates the fact that there are better displays out there. Before you say these posts could be subjective, I’ll let you know that some of them have done their own Displaycal readings, showing us raw comparative data on how their display is better, but of course you wouldn’t have seen those posts. The conclusion that “it was intended that way” cannot possibly follow when there are people with both yellow tinted iPhones and non-yellow tinted iPhones, it just doesn’t make sense. They could either be intended with a yellow tint or without, not both. Apple intended user X to have a yellow tint to their display, whilst they also intended user Y to have a white display, because logic. These screens aren’t intended to be less white, that reasoning is bonkers, why would Apple intend for a screen to be less colour accurate? I’m intrigued to know what else these non-issue claimers consider as non-issues. Perhaps the raised and flickering blacks are also intended? Yes, I love me some flickering greens in dark scenes when viewing content.
It’s a display lottery. It always has been, and it likely always will be for the foreseeable future, until factory display calibration can reach an unheard of level of precision. A similar thing has recently happened with Sony’s PlayStation 5s. Some consoles are receiving louder internal fans than others, which is due to different part manufacturers. Same thing with PS4 Pros. These lotteries are everywhere in the tech industry, it’s just whether people care enough about them to flag them as issues and make a change, that’s all it is. I’ve made this point before, that the pandemic more than likely has affected products and their launches negatively. The proof is in the pudding, the annual September iPhone event was pushed to October this year, and the product lineups launched staggered with 12s and Pros first and pro Max and minis later. Knowing this, it’s not hard to believe that QC took a hit this year, it’s been a tough year. I would align with this reasoning rather than believing Apple intended to give us yellow tinted displays which is absurd. Regardless, it’s each individual’s choice whether they want to accept their displays or not. I will support those who are trying to receive a display they are happy with, because these are premium products, and it raises awareness around these issues. If everyone adopted an attitude of accepting subpar products, how is progress ever going to be made? Criticism and competition drives better products.