Not a full season but in 2009 the superior Brawn was second best car for the second half of the season. Button held his nerve to maintain points to win the championship whilst Rubens lost his head at times complaining and making mistakes.
Not sure I agree on some of the observations of Mansell and Hill to be honest. Nigel was a very strong racer and I don’t believe for a second that if he’d had Senna as a teammate he’d definitely be beaten. Senna wasn’t perfect although his legend has made him out to be. He had his flaws and was easily rattled when he had a teammate near his level. He didn’t always come out on top with his often temperamental personality. One of the greatest for sure and Mansell is too in his own right. I do think Senna was the best if his generation however.
Damon came into the sport very late at 32 years old and didn’t just perform well due to his car. Sure he wasn’t going to win a championship in a Brabham and had one of the best cars during his time with Williams, but people forget he was very capable on his day and could make Michael look average at times. Not suggesting he was the better driver, but I hate how he’s often referred to as being lucky and untalented.
It could be argued 2008 was won by the second best car when you look at the stats. Ferrari had 8 pole positions to McLaren’s 7 and recorded a staggering 13 fastest laps to McLaren’s 3, with Kovalainen getting 2 of them. Ferrari won the constructors title that year by 21 points in the old system. I think the tables turned after McLaren having the better car the year before in 2007.