Love it, welcome to the 21st century.The GPDA tells the FIA to go bleep themselves.
Love it, welcome to the 21st century.The GPDA tells the FIA to go bleep themselves.
The problem is not the cost cap itself, but how it is applied.. Toto Wollff said that as a result of accidents, there might be events they cannot attend as they have over spent... So my solution was that before the start of the season, every car has a "book" of parts and what each part costs to install on the vehicle.. To comply with the cost cap..
So in the case of a rebuild, an excel worksheet is produced with every nut, but, inch of carbon fibre, every doughnut and cup of coffee listed.. This should be submitted to the FIA insurance, and the FIA insurance pays back the costs...
To make the teams pay for parts, then pay again after a crash, and this comes out of the cost cap is totally wrong...
It should come out of FIA insurance... To promote racing, and to prevent the absence of teams from events due to over runs on the budget...Cars/teams withdrawn from events as a result of lack of funds..Do we want 6 car grids?
It is like this, you have a something, say a car, it is insured... That insurance has to be insured, by a re-insurer, Llyods, and a few others, to insure F1 would cost pennies per race, the chance of a payout is low, so if they insure 20 cars, and 1 is damaged, they are out the cost of 1 car.. profit off the 19 that were not damaged..
My point is that the cost cap covers too much, it should only cover development and maintenance, accident damage during any on course event should be covered by 3rd party insurance, of which each team pays per car, and the FIA/Liberty/F1 pays as well..
The reason teams are hurting makes sense, it is no different to owning a car, and some drunk totals your car, and you have to pay all the expenses of towing 2 cars, two totaled cars, lawyers fees, and your insurance as well.. Why should Liberty benefit from the race, and have no expenses? Without cars, there is no race.. So to punish the teams, really explain how that is fair?
No, as I explained, the cost cap should cover development, and regular service/upgrades, accidents should be a 3rd party cover, one of the reasons for having a cost cap is to give a $ value to each car, and each component on each car, so that teams are forced to stay within the budget..Then the cost cap needs to be lowered even more since the teams do not need to hold a contingency reserve for repairs.
Chatter is that Qatar is going to buy a minority stake (25% or less) of the Audi F1 team leading into the Qatar Grand Prix.
Qatar poised for buy-in of Audiâs F1 team
www.motorsport.com
Embarrassing, totally the wrong direction and one the sport should be heading away from.
You could allow teams unlimited budgets and scope on aerodynamics and we’d still end up with the same product. Single teams rise to the top and dominate. The sport has to be managed for the longevity of the grid, avoiding teams going bankrupt mid season like we used to see in the early 90’s and to make sure it fits as a development category for the automotive sector.We are heading towards F2+, where all teams use the same power, the same brakes, tyres, fuel, and because physics is taught all over the world, the same aerodynamics, F1 will cease to exist as a viable formula.. With 2 or 3 engine suppliers, why not 2 or 3 tyre brands? F1 is on a slippery slope to become a 1 supplier formula.. F2+ F2 but with an extra 2% spice..
It's usually down to smaller teams overspending to close performance gaps towards much richer teams who can commission qualifying tyres, fuel companies to develop bespoke mixes and charter jets to fly unlimited parts to race weekends etc. Hence why teams like Footwork Arrows, Lola, Larrousse, Dallara, Layton House and Ligier wound up in so much debt in the 90's and had to sell out.Avoid the teams going bankrupt mid season? I wonder why that might very likely happen? If 1 or more teams end up in bankruptcy, who's fault is that? 2nd the cost cap automatically has the desired effect of reducing F1 to what is a better F2 but is not F1.. What we have now is F.95.. It is almost F1, but not...
Cost caps don't reduce evolution, they challenge designers and engineers to innovate within a tighter set of constraints. It is actually more impressive when a concept is realised this way, rather than throwing hundreds of millions at projects and employing hundreds of engineers.The cost cap reduces evolution, it prevents investment, it prevents innovation, if it is combined with having to pay costs 3 times.... F1 is no longer F1, it is all but in name only, in reality it is a super F2 brand now...
Always has confounded me that the smaller teams couldn't find a way to work together on stuff like that.It's usually down to smaller teams overspending to close performance gaps towards much richer teams who can commission qualifying tyres, fuel companies to develop bespoke mixes and charter jets to fly unlimited parts to race weekends etc. Hence why teams like Footwork Arrows, Lola, Larrousse, Dallara, Layton House and Ligier wound up in so much debt in the 90's and had to sell out.
Cost caps don't reduce evolution, they challenge designers and engineers to innovate within a tighter set of constraints. It is actually more impressive when a concept is realized this way, rather than throwing hundreds of millions at projects and employing hundreds of engineers.
Probably because they were all scrapping over the last of the constructors money should any of them score points. It became pointless for these teams to participate in the end and sponsorship ceased due to very little TV time. When McLaren started producing ECU's and engines were frozen to stop customer engines being older tech, we started seeing the grid close up a bit and the racing improved. So many fans have this romantic view of 30+ years ago with the Mansell's and Senna's dominating, but in reality backmarkers were often 10 seconds a lap slower on tiny budgets and faloing to the trackside through unreliability. F1 is in a better state now in terms of performance and competiton but as with anything, the best people generally design the best cars, big budget or not.Always has confounded me that the smaller teams couldn't find a way to work together on stuff like that.
Aston Martin has announced that Dan Fallows will step down as Technical Director of the F1 team, though he will stay with the group.
Team announcement
Aston Martin Aramco Formula One Team and Technical Director Dan Fallows announce that from November 2024, Dan will no longer serve as Technical Director of the Formula One Team.www.astonmartinf1.com
I'm up to the Austrian GP now, what....the.....hell.....was......that? In my eyes Lando was in the clear, Max drove like a right ******** and pushed Lando off and Lando gets a penalty?? And then Max blocks Lando whilst he has a puncture!! Sorry Max needs some serious points in his licence for that one.
I can see as I watch more it's dirty games on to dictate the winner... but in Austria Max was a VERY dirty driver.