Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Original poster
Feb 21, 2012
56,918
55,858
Behind the Lens, UK
It will be interesting to see how long Perez is re-signed for. I would expect Red Bull's plan is to eventually replace him with Liam Lawson (with Lawson replacing Danny at VCARB in 2025), but are they also developing a contingency plan for Max leaving in 2026-2028?

If they believe Max will stay through 2028, I could see them giving Perez another year and then showing him the door for Liam in 2026. If they believe Max might bolt, then do they go two years plus options so they have him available through 2028, if needed, and have Liam slot in for a departing Max?

As for Sainz, I really expect him to go with Stake/Audi now. Audi will pay him far more than Williams could/would and while Williams is improving, I do not see them competing for wins, much less championships. Not that Audi likely will during Carlos' tenure, either, but at this point, better to take the money and run and at least with Audi once your F1 career with them is over, you have options in other categories of motorsport.
Even if Adrian signs for Williams?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glideslope

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,518
11,534
Seattle, WA
Rumours doing the rounds that Alpine might be dropping Ocon before the Canadian GP. I wouldn’t be surprised at all as he’s crashed into every team mate he’s had and it’s never his fault apparently. Monaco looked like the straw that broke the camels back.

Ocon is the better of Alpine's two drivers and he could have options with other teams next year (Haas and maybe Williams if Kimi goes to Mercedes). And with Alpine only having two WDC and CC points, do they really want to park their better driver for a rookie even if said driver is a bell end?

Then again, Bruno Famin has not exactly covered himself in glory with his decisions as of late, so...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glideslope

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,518
11,534
Seattle, WA
Even if Adrian signs for Williams?

If Adrian does, that would really put the cat amongst the pigeons, as David Hobbs would be fond if saying. And that would likely allow Williams to under-bid Audi a not-insignificant bit on the salary offer (though Dorilton Capital could afford to match if they had to).

As poor as the W15 is, the Mercedes M15 E Performance PSU is a solid performer so it arguably could be a safer bet to go with Williams with Adrian and Mercedes PSU rather than Audi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glideslope

The-Real-Deal82

macrumors P6
Jan 17, 2013
17,298
25,442
Wales, United Kingdom
Ocon is the better of Alpine's two drivers and he could have options with other teams next year (Haas and maybe Williams if Kimi goes to Mercedes). And with Alpine only having two WDC and CC points, do they really want to park their better driver for a rookie even if said driver is a bell end?

Then again, Bruno Famin has not exactly covered himself in glory with his decisions as of late, so...

Personally I think Gasly is the better of the two drivers. I did see a rumour Mick Schumacher is in discussions for the seat and he’s not a rookie but I’m not convinced he’s a better option than Ocon.
 

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,518
11,534
Seattle, WA
Personally I think Gasly is the better of the two drivers. I did see a rumour Mick Schumacher is in discussions for the seat and he’s not a rookie but I’m not convinced he’s a better option than Ocon.

Ocon has the better qualifying and race finish record.

As for Schumacher, he is Alpine's WEC HyperCar driver, but I would expect them to give it to Jack Doohan since he is their Test and Reserve Driver. Also, I believe Le Mans testing is the same weekend as the Canadian Grand Prix so Mick would be unavailable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Glideslope

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,518
11,534
Seattle, WA
Pat Symonds has left his role as Formula 1's chief technical officer to join the Andretti Cadillac F1 program as an executive engineering consultant. Seems a major move for him if Andretti has no chance of ever making the grid.


And in regards to them never making the grid, Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei informed Mario Andretti during the Miami Grand Prix that he will "do everything in his power to ensure that Michael never enters F1". Liberty Media sources stated that Maffei did not say this, but instead told Mario that it was for "sound business reasons" they denied their bid to join in the 2025 or 2026 seasons with a customer power plant.

 

JustinePaula

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2012
826
424
This all seems a bit too much like a Pre K fight over who can play with the kindergarten's toy Barbie... Really, F1 is full of really immature toddlers, where are the adults? The FIA/F1 is so juvenile and pathetic, right now in 2024, we have at least 3 teams that may never in the best scenario will win a race or a title, having 2 more cars, really, how will that affect the top runners? Maybe F1/F2/F3 runs on a promotion/relegation system?? But truthfully, Williams is going to win a season before 2121? So let the Andretti team in.. Really right now it is a bunch of pre teens fighting over who wears mom's bra..pathetic..
 

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,432
2,829
This all seems a bit too much like a Pre K fight over who can play with the kindergarten's toy Barbie... Really, F1 is full of really immature toddlers, where are the adults? The FIA/F1 is so juvenile and pathetic, right now in 2024, we have at least 3 teams that may never in the best scenario will win a race or a title, having 2 more cars, really, how will that affect the top runners? Maybe F1/F2/F3 runs on a promotion/relegation system?? But truthfully, Williams is going to win a season before 2121? So let the Andretti team in.. Really right now it is a bunch of pre teens fighting over who wears mom's bra..pathetic..
I’m not sure if this is still tha case, but historically only the top 10 teams in the constructors championship get prize money at the end of the season (there is no prize money for drivers). For smaller teams, this prize money is essential for their survival. So, adding an 11th team means that one team would miss out on tens of millions of much needed dollars and thus run the risk of collapsing.
 

JustinePaula

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2012
826
424
I’m not sure if this is still tha case, but historically only the top 10 teams in the constructors championship get prize money at the end of the season (there is no prize money for drivers). For smaller teams, this prize money is essential for their survival. So, adding an 11th team means that one team would miss out on tens of millions of much needed dollars and thus run the risk of collapsing.
Actually that is not true, some of the teams get a handy little bonus, teams like Ferrari, for being there since the start, so even if Ferrari ran no cars, never pitched at events, they would still get paid, if you want to race in F1, and F1 is about marketing, you are driving 2 very fast billboards, on tracks lined with sponsorships, it makes more sense to have more cars, bringing in more income, and more media.. Less is bad for business.. Teams don't just run on what they get from the FIA, then drivers would be paid £23.10 an hour...Every team has cars in at least a dozen different formula across many countries, like Mclaren has in the US, Japan, etc...

So it really is not about money, never was, but about who gets the bra today, and really it is super juvenile this fight, really pathetic.. Cost caps destroyed F1.. For example, Red Bull should put in a claim for the replacement of the destroyed Perez car, and not carry the $4m or more costs, literally for about the cost of a season's worth of underpants for the team, the car would be insured, and a claim paid by 10am Monday... Really adults need to run the sport.
 

pachyderm

macrumors G4
Jan 12, 2008
10,757
5,423
Smyrna, TN
I’m not sure if this is still tha case, but historically only the top 10 teams in the constructors championship get prize money at the end of the season (there is no prize money for drivers). For smaller teams, this prize money is essential for their survival. So, adding an 11th team means that one team would miss out on tens of millions of much needed dollars and thus run the risk of collapsing.
I thought you had to score at least one point to get prize money, no?
 

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,432
2,829
I thought you had to score at least one point to get prize money, no?
Not that I'm aware of, HAAS and Williams still got prize money in 2021 and 2020 respectively despite not scoring points as far as I can tell.

Actually that is not true, some of the teams get a handy little bonus, teams like Ferrari, for being there since the start, so even if Ferrari ran no cars, never pitched at events, they would still get paid, if you want to race in F1, and F1 is about marketing, you are driving 2 very fast billboards, on tracks lined with sponsorships, it makes more sense to have more cars, bringing in more income, and more media.. Less is bad for business.. Teams don't just run on what they get from the FIA, then drivers would be paid £23.10 an hour...Every team has cars in at least a dozen different formula across many countries, like Mclaren has in the US, Japan, etc...

So it really is not about money, never was, but about who gets the bra today, and really it is super juvenile this fight, really pathetic.. Cost caps destroyed F1.. For example, Red Bull should put in a claim for the replacement of the destroyed Perez car, and not carry the $4m or more costs, literally for about the cost of a season's worth of underpants for the team, the car would be insured, and a claim paid by 10am Monday... Really adults need to run the sport.
It is true. But you are also correct that teams get a bonus the longer they've been in the sport. Ferrari is the only team to have participated as a constructor in every season of F1 since it started in 1950 and thus gets the largest "heritage" bonus, but long running teams like McLaren and Williams also get their part. The prize money is only a part of the teams' budgets, but the backmarkers struggle with attracting high-paying sponsors and are more dependent on the prize money than the front runners are. Williams total revenue in the last few years has been around £100 million (with losses of tens of million per year), and potentially losing out to tens of millions by the addition of another team could push them over the edge financially unless more money was added to the prize pot. Everything in F1 (and any major sport these days) is about money. If Liberty or the FIA guaranteed each of the existing teams more money if an 11th team joined the sport, then the door would be wide open.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm

Apple fanboy

macrumors Ivy Bridge
Original poster
Feb 21, 2012
56,918
55,858
Behind the Lens, UK
I wonder how the heritage bonus works when a team changes its name etc? Like when Lotus appeared on the grid due to basically a name change of an existing team (can’t even remember who now).
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm

CWallace

macrumors G5
Aug 17, 2007
12,518
11,534
Seattle, WA
I’m not sure if this is still tha case, but historically only the top 10 teams in the constructors championship get prize money at the end of the season...So, adding an 11th team means that one team would miss out on tens of millions of much needed dollars and thus run the risk of collapsing.

I do believe that is the case as when there were 11 teams on the grid, only 10 received money (Caterham F1 Team being the one left out). But that could be addressed with the next Concorde Agreement to extend the money across all 12 possible teams.


I wonder how the heritage bonus works when a team changes its name etc? Like when Lotus appeared on the grid due to basically a name change of an existing team (can’t even remember who now).

I believe only Ferrari, McLaren and Williams receive (and have received) the "heritage bonus" as they have operated continuously under the same team name.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,432
2,829
I do believe that is the case as when there were 11 teams on the grid, only 10 received money (Caterham F1 Team being the one left out). But that could be addressed with the next Concorde Agreement to extend the money across all 12 possible teams.
There was a new Concorde agreement signed in 2021, but since we’ve only had 10 teams since then I don’t think that anyone outside of F1 really knows what it says regarding a hypothetical 11th team. Supposedly there was some support in 2010 and a few years after that for the teams that entered F1 at that time. Once that dried up though they went belly up (Caterham being a good example) and we went back to 10 teams again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pachyderm

JustinePaula

macrumors 6502a
Mar 14, 2012
826
424
What the 10 team head cheeses have forgotten is that F1 is not about cars, it is not about drivers, it is about selling things like tobacco products and oils, to other things now, laptops and other tech. F1 is a tool for marketing, the cars, drivers, are there to service mobile billboards, F1 is advertising, not a sport, it is taxed as entertainment.. Max, Lewis, George are nothing more than those sexy hood ornaments you see at car shows, that lounge like lizards on the hoods of expensive mobile coffins from Italy/Germany...

F1 want to sell adverts, on cars, around the track, on tv, so having more teams, increases who watches F1, the by product of this is the actual race, but that is a by product, it was race Sunday, flog the car/tyres/petrol/oil or driving gloves on Monday, but that is still marketing 1st, sport 2nd.. F1 has never been a true sport, every race since 1950 has raced under some sort of sponsorship, it is about adverts..

So why the pre k toddlers running teams and the "sport" really should go to school, learn about what F1 is, what it was, and what it will be, that is nothing more than a factory for adverts to be stuck on the car, around the track.. Every race has some sort of company buying the rights.. Adverts.. We watch a season of stupid adverts.. F1 is about as real as WWF, really a pointless exercise, time for adults to do something...children don't always make great CEO's..
 
  • Wow
Reactions: pachyderm

cyb3rdud3

macrumors 601
Jun 22, 2014
4,056
2,729
UK
What the 10 team head cheeses have forgotten is that F1 is not about cars, it is not about drivers, it is about selling things like tobacco products and oils, to other things now, laptops and other tech. F1 is a tool for marketing, the cars, drivers, are there to service mobile billboards, F1 is advertising, not a sport, it is taxed as entertainment.. Max, Lewis, George are nothing more than those sexy hood ornaments you see at car shows, that lounge like lizards on the hoods of expensive mobile coffins from Italy/Germany...

F1 want to sell adverts, on cars, around the track, on tv, so having more teams, increases who watches F1, the by product of this is the actual race, but that is a by product, it was race Sunday, flog the car/tyres/petrol/oil or driving gloves on Monday, but that is still marketing 1st, sport 2nd.. F1 has never been a true sport, every race since 1950 has raced under some sort of sponsorship, it is about adverts..

So why the pre k toddlers running teams and the "sport" really should go to school, learn about what F1 is, what it was, and what it will be, that is nothing more than a factory for adverts to be stuck on the car, around the track.. Every race has some sort of company buying the rights.. Adverts.. We watch a season of stupid adverts.. F1 is about as real as WWF, really a pointless exercise, time for adults to do something...children don't always make great CEO's..
Every CEO is a child of someone. ;) Just think about the 'interesting' claims you are making a little bit…
 

headlessmike

macrumors 65816
May 16, 2017
1,432
2,829
No contract extension for Ocon with Alpine as many of us expected.


Not sure what his options would be in F1 going forwards as I cannot imagine there is a queue for his services.
His comment at the end of the article makes it sound like he's already set for 2025, wherever that may be.
BBC said:
Ocon said he would announce where he would be driving in 2025 “very soon”.
They speculate Sauber/Audi, HAAS, or Williams. Imagine a Magnusen-Ocon pairing. :eek:
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.