Design errors? Each team employs a lot of folks, many of them with a lot of degrees, more than a pharmacy has thermometers, so it would stand to reason, they understand the issues, you have a bloke we will call him Dave Moldy, he has the task of designing the car, well 2 cars, for 2 drivers, each driver has a battalion of PHD educated folk behind them, and Dave cannot get two cars on the grid that can compete???
Do they not understand, or is it a failure to communicate? Maybe the issue it the meat in the virtual seat, maybe that muppet is screwing up the data? You are relying on some bloke, the wrong size, the wrong ability to "tune" the cars?
This is a problem of 2 car teams, who do you "support" ? With only so many hours and test sessions, time divided is hurting more than it heals? Maybe 1 car/driver teams would be better?
Granted, F1 is a team-sport, the driver is only a percentage of the package, if there is bias in the team, and reduced support of driver 2 in the team, Sergio v Max, or George over Lewis, or in 2025, Lewis/Charles v Charles/Lewis..
The problem is magnified the tighter the regulations, and the closer we get to the "delta" region of aerodynamics, your ability to fix faults is so marginal, where as in the 1980's you had meters of scope, now in the 202o's, that scope is millimeter accurate, go 1 mm to far, and the driver is useless, 1 less and he looks brilliant..
Add to that the tyres, over which you have no control, you have certain grades for certain tracks, and data from a previous season.. That pushes your margins of error from accurate into a ever reducing gap.. It becomes even harder to find that sweet spot, then track surface, heat/weather...All affecting the car, and pushing the design closer and closer to failure..And by failure I mean making the driver look like he should be driving the catering team coach...
Teams look for ways to play on the very margins of the rules, which is 100% what they should be doing, playing well within the rules, is lost titles, for example the Merc steering wheel in out function to change some aspect of the handling/tyres..
Maybe introduce that as a standard, across all teams that want it.. Maybe some drivers prefer to not use it.. All I see are cars not overtaking, seasons being ruined by the inability to overtake, gimmicks like DRS, which never seem to be reliable.. maybe a rethink on how that works, but to artificially aid a car, seems like a very obvious cheat-code..
For me the thing I fear the most, "track limits" and the whinging and moaning.. Will we hear team radio? Who has the corner, who has the rights, it is getting harder to enjoy when it is suspicious and the walk to the office and the result of that takes hours...
Team orders, and the swapping of places, to give so and so a win, for both the WDC and CDC.. That should be banned.. or teams lose 3x the points gained as a result.. If Charles is ahead of Lewis, and Lewis cannot overtake then no team orders, if Lewis loses a title, he proved he was not great over the whole season...
But no 2 laps and a winner BS, if you cannot run the race to 75% within 3 or 4 hours, over a 2 hour race time, then the event is cancelled, NO POINTS!!!!