Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

laptech

macrumors 601
Apr 26, 2013
4,136
4,459
Earth
What percentage of the overall user community cares about the kinds of innovations talked about in these forums? I'd say the majority of iPad users I know could care less and they will continue to purchase.
You need to look at how polls and research studies are done because both only use a very small fraction of the population but yet the results are used to predict how the public as a whole would have acted. Therefore, in this forum, looking at the number of threads and comments about the ipad, there are more members complaining about the ipad than there is supporting it, therefore the probability is that there will be a large portion of the public who care about lack of innovation than there is who do not.
 

sparksd

macrumors G4
Jun 7, 2015
10,013
34,360
Seattle WA
You need to look at how polls and research studies are done because both only use a very small fraction of the population but yet the results are used to predict how the public as a whole would have acted. Therefore, in this forum, looking at the number of threads and comments about the ipad, there are more members complaining about the ipad than there is supporting it, therefore the probability is that there will be a large portion of the public who care about lack of innovation than there is who do not.

Don't be condescending - I know how polls are done. I don't buy it. Polls are a random selection of the population whereas forum members tend be enthusiasts and are not representative of the entire population of owners.
 
Last edited:

ejin222

macrumors 6502a
Oct 12, 2011
564
432
I don't the lack of pro apps is compliancy - I mean the amount of engineering and work to put the M1 and mini-led into the IPP shows they're really working hard to improve the iPad.

I think too many people are getting worked up because Apple didn't announce the pro apps this week. I love the idea that they split off iPadOS off on its own, and now we're starting to see the fruits of the split, i.e., better multi-tasking. Pro apps will come, just not today.
I agree with your assessment. I think people want the iPad Pro to be a touch screen Mac so badly that they haven't accepted it to be what it is: the best tablet, period. If you are able to accept the iPP for what it is, then, like myself, you see iPadOS 15 as upgrades that make you appreciate your device that much more. It seems that far too many people are trying to make the iPad fit their own lifestyle usage, and that's where so many disappointments are occurring. I don't take a motorcycle when I need a pickup truck.

At first, iPadOS was a subpar attempt on Apple to differentiate it from iOS, but I now truly see iPadOS as its own thing and love what they're doing. I've stopped blaming Apple a long time ago for the iPad and now it's just up to the third party developers to get on track with what the iPad can do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheRoadRunner

jsmith1

macrumors 6502a
Jun 6, 2010
683
594
Expensive sidepiece that is way overpriced and overpowered for the majority use it for...Apple is the winner here by far....best part is the justification posts.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
Expensive sidepiece that is way overpriced and overpowered for the majority use it for...Apple is the winner here by far....best part is the justification posts.
Here's the thing, everyone is different, and I can only speak to my posts. I found value and use for the iPad, so in a very real sense the winner is me. Yes, Apple makes a profit, but what company doesn't strive to make profits.

The joy of being a free market is, you are free to choose to buy a product or not. Don't think that the iPad is worth it, great, don't buy it. But just because you fail to see the value means its a worthless product that apple has successfully fooled people into thinking they need it. I use mine every day, and my kids do as well
 

Ludatyk

macrumors 603
May 27, 2012
5,967
5,139
Texas
I agree with your assessment. I think people want the iPad Pro to be a touch screen Mac so badly that they haven't accepted it to be what it is: the best tablet, period. If you are able to accept the iPP for what it is, then, like myself, you see iPadOS 15 as upgrades that make you appreciate your device that much more. It seems that far too many people are trying to make the iPad fit their own lifestyle usage, and that's where so many disappointments are occurring. I don't take a motorcycle when I need a pickup truck.
As Apple users.. we are looking at the iPad in the lens of a Mac, which is unfair to the iPad. The Mac has had years upon years of refinement and revisions. With Me, I try to remove the Mac from the equation.. just judge the iPad on it’s on merit.

After sitting with iPadOS 15 a few days, I’m enjoying it. The new multitasking improvements, new keyboard shortcut layout, App Library (as much as I was indifferent to it on the iPhone), widgets (still undecided on final layout) and the new look Safari.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ejin222

DMG35

Contributor
May 27, 2021
2,527
8,170
Apple can be complacent with regards to anything they do because they know their customer base is extremely loyal. They know their loyal customer base will keep on buying Apple products regardless of what faults or delays or lack of occurs. Apple seems to be the only consumer company in the world who can get away with it.

When a consumer is unhappy with a companies product say due to lack of updates or innovation, the usual course of action is not purchase that companies product in the hope sales drop and they are forced to action. This has happened time and time again with clothing companies, footwear companies, car companies, toy companies and they take immediate action when they see customers are not purchasing their products because the consumer is not happy with the way things are being done. This never seems to happen with Apple. Even now people are complaining about lack of innovation in the ipad and the OS but yet people are still buying the ipad. If people keep buying the ipad knowing there is a lack of innovation involved, why should Apple find a need to innovate something that people are still happy to purchase.

If people stopped buying ipads, sales would take a hit and that means less money being taken and a reduction in money would cause Apple to react but that is never going to happen and Apple know it because they know their customer base will still by their products, lack of inovations, faults and all.

It does seem that way but that won't and never lasts. Look at Research in Motion (BlackBerry). They had one of the most die hard loyal fanbases in the history of technology and the got passed by with better products from other companies because they chose to be reactionary and stopped innovating. They got stuck in the past and refused to move forward until it was too late and now that company is merely a security company trying to hang on.

No company is infallible as history has shown us time and again. Apple does seemingly seem invincible, but a lot of other companies have thought that throughout history and they ended up going out of business. Apple has to keep making great products or there will come a point when someone else will make something that make people second guess their next Apple purchase.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Stridr69 and ericwn

Scarboose

macrumors regular
Sep 15, 2018
126
178
My two cents on this post - what if Apple had put the A15X chip in this iPad? It would still cost exactly the same (Extra $100 compared to last two gens for the screen). You're getting an extremely powerful chip for the same price as the previous two generations that is definitely better. Are you able to push an iPad like you are a Mac? No! However, that's not what the iPad was designed to do. I'm slightly disappointed too, but I still think its an amazing device for the price you pay!
 
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,920
13,271
My two cents on this post - what if Apple had put the A15X chip in this iPad? It would still cost exactly the same (Extra $100 compared to last two gens for the screen). You're getting an extremely powerful chip for the same price as the previous two generations that is definitely better. Are you able to push an iPad like you are a Mac? No! However, that's not what the iPad was designed to do. I'm slightly disappointed too, but I still think its an amazing device for the price you pay!

A hypothetical A15X would be more powerful than the M1. If Apple switches to a yearly schedule with these chips, then that would probably be equivalent to the M2. :p
 

laptech

macrumors 601
Apr 26, 2013
4,136
4,459
Earth
It does seem that way but that won't and never lasts. Look at Research in Motion (BlackBerry). They had one of the most die hard loyal fanbases in the history of technology and the got passed by with better products from other companies because they chose to be reactionary and stopped innovating. They got stuck in the past and refused to move forward until it was too late and now that company is merely a security company trying to hang on.

No company is infallible as history has shown us time and again. Apple does seemingly seem invincible, but a lot of other companies have thought that throughout history and they ended up going out of business. Apple has to keep making great products or there will come a point when someone else will make something that make people second guess their next Apple purchase.
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.

As i said before, if the above happens to any other company, production ceases or ends up out of business because customers do not purchase the products but with Apple, even when they are not innovating, people still purchase their products. It's something that has baffled experts for years. Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!
 

sparksd

macrumors G4
Jun 7, 2015
10,013
34,360
Seattle WA
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.

As i said before, if the above happens to any other company, production ceases or ends up out of business because customers do not purchase the products but with Apple, even when they are not innovating, people still purchase their products. It's something that has baffled experts for years. Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!

Because people still like their products and at least on the tablet side, the competition is poor (I speak from experience as an owner of 6 Android tablets from multiple vendors). On the phone side where there is more competition, Apple still lags Android on overall world sales.
 

Scarboose

macrumors regular
Sep 15, 2018
126
178
A hypothetical A15X would be more powerful than the M1. If Apple switches to a yearly schedule with these chips, then that would probably be equivalent to the M2. :p
Probably! Either way, the first year that Apple actually tells us how much RAM you’re getting… everyone is immediately disappointed
 

ejin222

macrumors 6502a
Oct 12, 2011
564
432
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.

As i said before, if the above happens to any other company, production ceases or ends up out of business because customers do not purchase the products but with Apple, even when they are not innovating, people still purchase their products. It's something that has baffled experts for years. Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!
I'm not sure where you draw the line between innovating and not, but I think the bigger picture with Apple isn't solely upon one product, but the ecosystem of products that only they have successfully integrated at this level of success. I used to be a Blackberry user myself. And yes, when something better came along for my one product (smartphone), I switched. But with Apple, my iPad usage is connected with my iPhone, Mac Mini, MBP, AirPods, etc...

Look at what they showed for iPadOS. It may not have been the Mac crossover that people wanted, but look how well they showed the connectivity between devices. To copy one file on an iPad and to bring it over through a MBP to an iMac? I mean, maybe a singular BlackBerry product is not the greatest comparison between what Apple is doing with its ecosystem?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Broadus

Ludatyk

macrumors 603
May 27, 2012
5,967
5,139
Texas
Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!
How exactly is Apple not innovating?

I get the argument of there's still static apps unable to move freely on the iPhone/iPad since the introduction of the devices. But is that a reason to not buy a product because I want my apps in certain areas? Tbh, not trying to defend Apple here... but look at that Universal Control feature as @ejin222 mention... as much as I'm not interested in that feature. Name me one company that can do something like that.
 

spiderman0616

Suspended
Aug 1, 2010
5,670
7,499
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.

As i said before, if the above happens to any other company, production ceases or ends up out of business because customers do not purchase the products but with Apple, even when they are not innovating, people still purchase their products. It's something that has baffled experts for years. Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!
You are very clearly misunderstanding not only how Apple operates, but also how normal, non-techie gadget users view Apple. If the iPad suddenly started to suck, nobody would buy it. Blackberry went down because their products sucked. Apple's products don't suck. And specifically for iPad, I'd be willing to bet that less than 5% of iPad users even know there was a keynote this week. Most just use the iPad, update whenever, and if they notice a new feature is there and find it useful, then great. If not, they're none the wiser and life goes on. They'll buy a new iPad at some point when they break their current one or the battery starts to die permanently.

This idea that Apple users are just a bunch of dumb sheep that eagerly lap up whatever Apple puts out because they've been somehow brainwashed by a dude that died 10 years ago--it's just silly and was never accurate. People will vote with their dollars if a product is not hitting the mark. Exhibit A: the original HomePod. The iPad is not the original HomePod. It's a well established product that people love. The iPad Pro is a niche fork of that product category that most Apple users don't even own. If you classify that as "lack of innovation" then it seems like you just need to ignore the iPad and use something else. The only other option is to ride it out and see what comes next. This isn't a complicated thing.
 

FrozenDarkness

macrumors 68000
Mar 21, 2009
1,832
1,124
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.

As i said before, if the above happens to any other company, production ceases or ends up out of business because customers do not purchase the products but with Apple, even when they are not innovating, people still purchase their products. It's something that has baffled experts for years. Why do people stop buying products when a company fails to innovate but when Apple does exactly the same thing, people still purchase the product!!!
Blackberry failed not becuase they stopped innovating, they failed because someone out-innovated them and invented a new product category.

Nobody has invented this product yet.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,920
13,271
You are very clearly misunderstanding not only how Apple operates, but also how normal, non-techie gadget users view Apple. If the iPad suddenly started to suck, nobody would buy it. Blackberry went down because their products sucked. Apple's products don't suck. And specifically for iPad, I'd be willing to bet that less than 5% of iPad users even know there was a keynote this week. Most just use the iPad, update whenever, and if they notice a new feature is there and find it useful, then great. If not, they're none the wiser and life goes on. They'll buy a new iPad at some point when they break their current one or the battery starts to die permanently.

Yep. For most, the choice is just budget, size, style, capacity and color. Then just use until it becomes too slow, storage fills up, battery goes bad, device breaks or develops some other issue. Rinse and repeat.

For the most part, the iPad's main alternatives are either cheapie Fire tablets on the low-end or Surface and other Windows 2-in-1s. There are Android tablets but they're not on most people's radar. iPad has pretty much become synonymous with tablet.

Really, it's kind of the same thing with non-techies and PCs. They just buy whatever Windows laptop/desktop is on sale that meets their requirements. Sure, those who can afford it may switch to Mac. However, most are more likely to remain on Windows than switch to Linux.
 

Unregistered 4U

macrumors G4
Jul 22, 2002
10,612
8,636
It is hard to argue though that Apple isn't being challenged in the tablet space. I think they still make an incredible product but having a little competition in that space would only make it better.
When you think about the fact that Apple sells more iPads than HP sells laptops… than Dell sells laptops… the competition isn’t tablets, it’s all mobile computers and Apple is excelling with mobile computer customers in a pretty big way.
 

Unregistered 4U

macrumors G4
Jul 22, 2002
10,612
8,636
If people stopped buying ipads, sales would take a hit and that means less money being taken and a reduction in money would cause Apple to react but that is never going to happen and Apple know it because they know their customer base will still by their products, lack of inovations, faults and all.
What percentage of the overall user community cares about the kinds of innovations talked about in these forums? I'd say the majority of iPad users I know could care less and they will continue to purchase.
Only half the iPads sold per year are to repeat customers. They will likely continue to sell huge numbers to folks that have never used an iPad before because that experience is what very many people TODAY prefer.
 

Unregistered 4U

macrumors G4
Jul 22, 2002
10,612
8,636
No company is infallible as history has shown us time and again. Apple does seemingly seem invincible, but a lot of other companies have thought that throughout history and they ended up going out of business. Apple has to keep making great products or there will come a point when someone else will make something that make people second guess their next Apple purchase.
Your example shows just how emphatically loyal and possibly guilable Apple's customers are. Research in Motion (BlackBerry) customers saw a lack of innovation going on and they hit the company where it hurts, not buying their products. The company failed to innovate, sales dropped, the product ceased. In the real world that is how it happens but Apple seem to be imune to this real world issue because even when people on forums like this complain of the lack of innovation going on with certain Apple products, people still purchase those products.
The point is rather that Apple continually resets and focuses on the “today” customers, the customers that have the longest purchase future ahead of them. I’d say that the fact that you see posts about “Apple having lost their way”, or “This isn’t the same Apple I grew up with” is PROOF of that. Apple hasn’t lost their way, they’ve found a NEW way and those folks are very likely not part of it.
 

Euroamerican

macrumors 6502
May 27, 2010
469
347
Boise
Newton MessagePad.. Now that was a bit of disappointment. I gave up, eventually, on them ever getting a good synching solution with Windows productivity apps. But, I'm completely over it now!
 

spiderman0616

Suspended
Aug 1, 2010
5,670
7,499
The point is rather that Apple continually resets and focuses on the “today” customers, the customers that have the longest purchase future ahead of them. I’d say that the fact that you see posts about “Apple having lost their way”, or “This isn’t the same Apple I grew up with” is PROOF of that. Apple hasn’t lost their way, they’ve found a NEW way and those folks are very likely not part of it.
Right--if Apple were still the Apple I personally grew up with, they'd be out of business by now. It's 2021. The competition is fierce and fast-moving. The firms that don't adapt will simply die.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,920
13,271
The point is rather that Apple continually resets and focuses on the “today” customers, the customers that have the longest purchase future ahead of them. I’d say that the fact that you see posts about “Apple having lost their way”, or “This isn’t the same Apple I grew up with” is PROOF of that. Apple hasn’t lost their way, they’ve found a NEW way and those folks are very likely not part of it.

Ain't that the truth. When I asked my nieces (one starting college, one starting high school) what they wanted, they both said iPad.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.