If I had known I would never have upgraded to this crap, shame on Apple! How you do it! Complaint stuff! they are making us lose resources and money!I bypassed the problem by going back to Catalina from Big Sur using Time Machine.
Are you sent feedback to apple about this problem?If I had known I would never have upgraded to this crap, shame on Apple! How you do it! Complaint stuff! they are making us lose resources and money!
everyday! it seems that Apple knows about it and doesn't care! Absurd, such a serious bug! MacRumors please write something about it!Are you sent feedback to apple about this problem?
Could you please specify which BenQ monitor you're using?External 4K Benq 32 inch monitor is working fine after installing Big Sur 11.2 and restarting.
Let's hope that it will keep this good behaviour after waking up from a sleep (so that I don't have to close the monitor from the on/off switch as I do after Big Sur 11.1 update).
My machine is a MacBook Pro 16.
In general i agree with that its a nogo apple don't care about that but:Many people write to use an HDMI adapter because thanks to this you can get 4K@60Hz. I agree with that, but I don't have such an adapter. I have paid a lot of money for an adapter that only supports 4K@30Hz, so I have to spend another money because of the problem Apple has created? Thanks to USB-C, I can comfortably use my MacBook Pro 16” as a clamshell. After powering on the monitor, the computer started automatically. With HDMI it doesn't work. I have to take the MB out of the stand and open it to turn on. Apple has broken the ability to comfortably use the monitor connection via USB-C, and the worst of all is that no way of reporting a problem works.
There are possible/probable/confirmed limitations concerning colour gamuts and HDMI is not preferred for any colour critical work past sRGB. Although I understand where you're coming from, please avoid overgeneralisation such as this, as this issue is affecting many users who depend on colour accuracy in their workflow.With the adapter its even possible to use a single port solution and there is no limitation of hdmi compared to DP(usb-c) or tb connections.
This is not true.There are possible/probable/confirmed limitations concerning colour gamuts and HDMI is not preferred for any colour critical work past sRGB. Although I understand where you're coming from, please avoid overgeneralisation such as this, as this issue is affecting many users who depend on colour accuracy in their workflow.
I confirm, via hdmi -> usb c sucks, only 8 bit, dull colors.There are possible/probable/confirmed limitations concerning colour gamuts and HDMI is not preferred for any colour critical work past sRGB. Although I understand where you're coming from, please avoid overgeneralisation such as this, as this issue is affecting many users who depend on colour accuracy in their workflow.
What should proof this? The limitation is your hdmi adapter or maybe even the monitor which has a problem with the hdmi implementation.I confirm, via hdmi -> usb c sucks, only 8 bit, dull colors.
My monitor benq PD2720U is hdmi 2.0 (not 2.1) waiting for the fix from Apple I bought a premium 4k 60hz cable, but as you can see in the screen the colors suck and I only get 8 bits.What should proof this? The limitation is your hdmi adapter or maybe even the monitor which has a problem with the hdmi implementation.
There are good reasons to judge what apple is doing here and its definetely one of the worst support a company can offer but please don't spread misinformations.
HDMI 2.1 has 48Gbps Bandwidth vs DP 1.2 17.82 and DP 1.4 with 32.4Gbps with a maximum data rate of 25.92Gbps.
So HDMI can even transport 4K 120hz 12Bit signals without any problem what display port cannot. With LG Ultrafine monitor they are using even 2 Display ports lanes just to get the 5k Signal....
I get this information from my MBP13 2015 which outputs truncated HDMI signal for example, and I use that machine sometimes.This is not true.
You can have a Full RGB signal 4-4-4 without any limitations. I don't know how where you get this information from... there was a time that you had to manual set the rgb to full range on windows pc's.
I don't really understand your argument and attempts to somewhat justify this situation with botched outputs. Again, the whole point of TB3 displays is to use one single cable for everything including an optional hub on the display itself for example. This cannot be achieved with adapters that add clutter. Monitors mentioned above support required resolutions and refresh rates, and were working fine before.