They are generous with some base specs. My Apple Watch has 32GB storage and it's almost certainly going to be 75% empty for its entire life!Nowadays, with modern prices even 16GB RAM and 512GB storage should not be a thing anymore. 32GB and 1TB should be the base.
On smartphones, 256GB should be the base storage and 120Hz screen should be the default.
Apples margins are insane! There is no reason to think they can’t cut the price 20% and still make more than any other OEM. It’s sickening.
Further penetration into the PC market is only hampered by their own arrogance and greed.
what modern pricesNowadays, with modern prices even 16GB RAM and 512GB storage should not be a thing anymore. 32GB and 1TB should be the base.
That's why I've built a pc to offload memory intensive tasks for the price of upgrading a macbook to my needs, and essentially relegated my macbook to a thick client. And Apple not only loses the margin on upgrades, but I also won't upgrade my macbook until the battery degradation makes it unusable. Switching away from icloud drive and costing them services revenue is just the cherry on the cake. But the margins stay high, so Tim is happy.Not good enough. Lunar Lake is only $60 to upgrade from 16GB to 32GB RAM and includes 1TB SSD. Intel is going to eat Apple's lunch.
What I meant was that they tested it againt M3, M3 won the perf while having 8GB RAM vs Lunar lake Asus Zenbook having 32. But the battery life was pretty same on both.At single-core, Lunar Lake is closest to the M2, not M3. At multi-core, yeah, it gets closer to the M3. But that comes with the asterisk of higher power draw.
Enjoy your faster single core speed when you start swapping. Even back then when my only apple product was an ipod shuffle, the most annoying thing about Apple and some of their users was their fetishism of CPU benchmarks. And since then raw processing power just became even less important.We'll see about battery life. As for performance, the 256V is roughly at the level of an M2 Pro, (faster on multi-core, but slower on single-core); the M4 will handily beat it.
Enjoy your faster single core speed when you start swapping.
Even back then when my only apple product was an ipod shuffle, the most annoying thing about Apple and some of their users was their fetishism of CPU benchmarks.
lol that’s not remotely what Apple users are known for. That’s the Intel/AMD/Gamer crowd you’re talking about. 😂Enjoy your faster single core speed when you start swapping. Even back then when my only apple product was an ipod shuffle, the most annoying thing about Apple and some of their users was their fetishism of CPU benchmarks. And since then raw processing power just became even less important.
As a shareholder, I care about earnings per share, not margins. There's an optimal margin somewhere, which would generate the highest EPS. And hardware sales are not isolated, higher volume will lead to higher services revenues, which are important, even according to Tim.Apple sells less but makes more money per unit.
Exactly my point.I have 32 GiB RAM. It doesn't usually swap that much, though I wouldn't mind even more RAM. (But not enough to upgrade to the Max.)
Wrong, it is a thread about a macbook pro equipped with m4. A laptop is much more than the cpu. If it weren't you couldn't justify the higher price of the mac compared to an intel on performance alone.I mean, this is literally a thread about the M4. Of course CPU benchmarks will be discussed.
Sure, if you want the base price to be more expensive than everNowadays, with modern prices even 16GB RAM and 512GB storage should not be a thing anymore. 32GB and 1TB should be the base.
On smartphones, 256GB should be the base storage and 120Hz screen should be the default.
And hardware sales are not isolated, higher volume will lead to higher services revenues, which are important, even according to Tim.
Exactly my point.
Wrong, it is a thread about a macbook pro equipped with m4. A laptop is much more than the cpu.
If it weren't you couldn't justify the higher price of the mac compared to an intel on performance alone.
A pure chipmaker of course will talk about benchmarks, d'uh. And the majority of gamers use desktops, so irrelevant here. And Apple even did it in the Intel chip era, with Apple Silicon at least it's more understandable.lol that’s not remotely what Apple users are known for. That’s the Intel/AMD/Gamer crowd you’re talking about. 😂
Win-win!Yeah, but it doesn't run macOS.
Not in a decade I can assure you. Intel’s era is long gone when they grew complacent.Not good enough. Lunar Lake is only $60 to upgrade from 16GB to 32GB RAM and includes 1TB SSD. Intel is going to eat Apple's lunch.
View attachment 2434005
View attachment 2434006
These are indeed compelling arguments.Nowadays, with modern prices even 16GB RAM and 512GB storage should not be a thing anymore. 32GB and 1TB should be the base.
On smartphones, 256GB should be the base storage and 120Hz screen should be the default.
Has any Apple laptop ever had that?I'm hoping there is the option for more than an 8tb internal SSD. Crazy expensive no doubt.
YouTube does not pay to Russian authors, he has zero income from YouTube (except direct income from native ad integration if this video have such, because I did not watch the video indeed). And Wylsa never publish fakes.