Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
That’s really sort of where I’ve ended up on this — the coming tariff wars, and rumors of tariff wars, are already priced into this model.
Maybe but what about all the other products? Do you think Apple will really increase prices for all their other products except for the iPhone 16e?
 
I was considering the iPhone 16e as an "upgrade" from my iPhone 13 Pro, mainly as a stopgap until Apple releases a more interesting premium device like an iPhone Air or Flip. The idea of a larger OLED display, improved battery life, and a 48MP camera made it seem like a decent option.

However, the missing features and price point make this a non-starter for me. The lack of MagSafe is disappointing, and while the new C1 modem sounds promising, I’d rather wait and see how it performs in real-world use before making the jump. The binned GPU is another concern, especially when coming from a Pro model.

As for Apple Intelligence support, it’s just not that interesting to me—at least for now. I don’t see it offering anything compelling enough to justify an upgrade. Starting at $599, the iPhone 16e doesn’t strike the right balance of price and features, so I’d rather stick with my iPhone 13 Pro and wait for something truly innovative.
It’s a huge downgrade from a 13 Pro in many aspects. Performance gains yes, but what do you need it for that much? Even an iPhone X is not at all slow for what you’d need an iPhone for.

The 48MP camera is nice because it can do 2x zoom but your 13 Pro can do it with the telephoto, and it definitely looks better than the upscaled crop from the main sensor. It’s just not that clear of an image, even though it’s technically the same resolution, optical will always win.

The base iPhone 14 had literally nothing over the 13 apart from crash detection and this is the iPhone 14, but worse in key areas that matter with a better chip that nobody cares about yet.

It could’ve been a nice device if it was at the same $429 even if it had last year’s chip but I don’t see why they replaced the iPhone 14 with a worse device at the same price. Apple is obsessed with the chip talking points but it’s not how it is in reality for users.
 
Last edited:
Carrier discounts are mainly an illusion. They lock you in to a more expensive monthly plan and that nullifies any savings on the cost of the phone.
I know. I have Spectrum where you pay for your own phone and not discounted through some stupid plan, and at most they sometimes give a $100 trade-in bonus on the latest models, which still allows them to profit on selling you the phone, considering that the wholesale price is probably 1/2 the MSRP for an iPhone, based on Apple margins.

But most fools in the USA pay for Verizon or ATT or T-Mobile and get their $30-$40 in "free" stuff every month in exchange for $50+ higher bills. They give you a phone that costs them $500 and a subscription to MAX or something that costs them $2 a month, and then charge you an extra $600 a year.

And that's why I say that it makes little sense in the USA, since those big 3 will give you a "free" iPhone and tell you how lucky you are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chuckeee
It’s a huge downgrade from a 13 Pro in many aspects. Performance gains yes, but what do you need it for that much? Even an iPhone X is not at all slow for what you’d need an iPhone for.

The 48MP camera is nice because it can do 2x zoom but your 13 Pro can do it with the telephoto, and it definitely looks better than the upscaled crop from the main sensor. It’s just not that clear of an image, even though it’s technically the same resolution, optical will always win.
I have a 12Pro and it does everything fine other than photos and magnifying glass, because the 3 lens system is so clunky and poorly integrated that you get dramatic shifts between lenses and focal lengths. It negates the whole purpose of a "pro" camera system when it gets in the way. I would image the 16e takes better pictures than the 12Pro, but I doubt anyone would do a comparison.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sixtimes
It's funny - I was definitely a knee-jerk "WTH" to the idea of no Magsafe. But at the end of the day I'm going to use a Magsafe case anyway. That said, I don't actually have any Magsafe chargers - I just like the Magsafe holders in situations like my car. I guess this could be problematic if you're wanting to use a Magsafe charger - though it should still charge wirelessly then?

At the end of the day I still don't understand the omission - Apple has invested so much in the Magsafe accessory ecosystem, and now a certain segment of their user base is going to realize they don't really need it that much... at least need it embedded in the phone itself. Conspiracy theory - this is the beginning of them moving away from it being built into the phone! ;)
Would be interested to see if a third party embeds a MagSafe ring into a case and it aligns with a MagSafe charger anyway, and still works as a wireless charging base. Is the need for MagSafe IN the phone a thing at all? Or can a case substitute?
 
At least MR is consistent with the hate for products that haven't even been released and used by the public. lol The amount of doom and gloom over new products never ceases to amaze.

If the 16e isn't for you for whatever reason. that is fine. Just realize that there are millions of other people in the world who think differently, have different needs and preferences, and barring a manufacture defect, will be perfectly happy with the new 16e. I think most here forget that MR land is not represent (as a whole) the typical mindset of an Apple buyer. I think most people are just looking for an affordable phone that will last several yers, and will perform the basic functions that are important to them.

I think most of the naysayers on here are spec chasers who care more about the perceived prestige amongst others that they think their Apple products bring them, (which strikes me as a high school mentality) versus the reality that nobody outside of them really cares what they buy and use.

I hope the 16e makes the buyers happy. I don't need one but, I may get one because it really is a big deal with this model being Apple's first foray into having their own modem.
 
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: rmadsen3 and mvdrl
At this price with that much tech taken out it‘s a no from me.

Guess my 13 mini will get a battery upgrade at some point and I’ll further save up the money. Since Apple is not huge on discounts I don’t expect the phone to be reduced to a meaningful point where a purchase makes sense.

For me the 16e is not an SE replacement it is a paper release trying to upsell you to the base iPhone.
Yeah, Tim “Upselling” Cook in action.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmadsen3
I'd rather wait until the iphone 16 drops to $699 this fall and buy it for just $100 more than the 16E. But I suspect the 16 may not drop in price, and the 17 be priced at $899 to $949.
 
"E" stands for EXPENSIVE! This kills the whole idea of what the original SE was all about!
We make an iPhone 16e mini and you have the best phone ever ! :

- No 2x optical zoom

- Mini size

- 24h of battery

- best price ever : 429$

- you get everything else the iPhone 16e has
 
  • Sad
Reactions: Chuckeee
Gonna be honest here, if my 13 mini is not further supported and there are only lackluster offers from Apple, I might return to the Android world.

I switched from Samsung to Apple, but now since a lot of companies offer the same critical support multiyear OS that Apple does, even for their entry phones, there is no real enticing offer Apple has right now...

As stated already, the E is now just a release to upsell you to the base iPhone and I don't regard the price - as advertised - as "greatest" price...

I hope there will be a severe discount on techresellers if this phone bombs.
 
  • Love
Reactions: turbineseaplane
RIP the LCD iPhone. Since there's next to no chance this doesn't use PWM, it looks like I (and others) will be forced to stick with the iPhone 11 as long as I can then having to leave iOS. It's going to be a pain missing out on airdrop, shared clipboard etc, but Apple clearly doesn't see any profit in offering an alternative.
 
  • Like
Reactions: rmadsen3
Not sure where you’re located but in the USA the main players are Google, Apple and Samsung for mobile devices from carrier stores. It’s priced very competitively as a main player entry level device. Now of course there’s plenty of Android grey market devices available with “better” specs for much lower from the likes of Amazon or eBay.

In the UK we have an increasingly wide array of Chinese Android devices that are more competitively priced than this device with more features to offer. TBH unless you’re wedded to Apple this device doesn’t stack up that well in comparison especially at the far too expensive price point.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LlamaLarry
I bought the the Iphone 15 pro last year which was heavy discounted in favor of the new iphone 16 pro. I think i saved myself more then 500 euro.

Thats not something you can do with the SE as the buying the last year model means its really outdated by now as this new 16 e is barely on par with a 13 pro and there will be a 17 pro end of this year......

Honestly i will never buy a iphone pro again, for my quick pic/instagram post usage a normal iphone would be sufficient.

I do not play games and only have a few essential apps installed.

Inflation is a bitch so i understand the pricing bump.

I have learned that any modern mobile phone will do for me these days, if its android or iphone i dont care, what i do know is that my next phone will be on a budget as i dont see any benefits of paying double the price of a average android phone anymore.

I no longer have the needs that iphones used to provide over android phones as that playing field is long ago leveled out already.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.