It will still be a lot faster in single-core, and somewhat faster in multicore.I wonder how the nerfed version compares to the M2...
I was going to say that you're astoundingly ignorant, but what's really astounding is that so many people are walking around thinking this is true. So it's not surprising to find one more.M3 was such lacklustre that I am not surprised at all. Hardly an update, basically it was a rebranded M2 which in turn was an ever more meagre update. Hopefully M4 will be decent.
What a ridiculous claim. The processors are not designed for bursty workloads. iPhones are, necessarily, and to some extent iPads are too (though less so, and even less now with the copper and graphite).Working at full blast for prolonged period would really degrade the battery. These processors are designed mostly for bursty workloads… get it done fast and then pull back.
No, it's entirely different. In fact it's likely by far the biggest change since the M1.M3MBA has 1 extra performance CPU core but two fewer efficiency cores - and slightly faster ram vs the M4 base in the normal pros (not counting the 1TB models as normal) - makes me think this ‘M4’ is mainly a number bump and they had to make changes to accommodate the screen driver with the dual layer OLED?
WWDC '24 here we come 🤞
i disagree… iPads are designed for bursty workloads. They dont have active cooling…It will still be a lot faster in single-core, and somewhat faster in multicore.
I was going to say that you're astoundingly ignorant, but what's really astounding is that so many people are walking around thinking this is true. So it's not surprising to find one more.
The M3 is a significant upgrade, not at all lackluster. The M2 was, in some ways, closer to your description (a "rebrand"), but in other ways a more substantial improvement. I won't rehash this here - the M3 thread has a lot written about this already.
What a ridiculous claim. The processors are not designed for bursty workloads. iPhones are, necessarily, and to some extent iPads are too (though less so, and even less now with the copper and graphite).
No, it's entirely different. In fact it's likely by far the biggest change since the M1.
Bandwidth on the M3 is 100GBps. On the M4, it's 20% higher (120GBps) - at least on the iPads. The M4 is likely using LPDDR5x, and can probably run even faster in a less thermally constrained system. We'll likely see in a month at WWDC, where I think they'll introduce the M4 Studio and Pro. It may even be faster in the Pro laptops, whenever they ship.
There are a LOT of unanswered questions about the M4 right now, but don't think it's just a rebadged M3. It's got 3e9 more transistors, and it's almost certainly on N3E, so it's a totally new layout. Beyond that, FinFlex opens up huge opportunities for Apple to optimize for power AND performance in different parts of the chip, and I expect they've done exactly that.
WWDC is shaping up to be very exciting for hardware, quite unexpectedly!
The now less expensive base iPad is that couch device.That OLED display is going to be awesome.
That said, this class of device has completely left behind its original intent of being a couch device made for comfort that's reasonably priced.
At these prices and with the tech they put in nowadays, they really should be running something more complete than ToyOS. But as we all know, that would eat into the sales of macbooks so not happening. No new version of ipadOS is going to challenge this since it's a business goal not to cross that threshold.
I remember this rumor from 2 years ago. This person doesn't have too bad of a track record with respect to Apple-related leaks. If there's a good time for this to happen, it is this year. The whole tweet thread is interesting.iPadOS 18 should be a significant release in terms of the core iOS functionality, with some visual changes to UI for the first time since perhaps iOS 7 as well as a host of updates to core apps like Calendars, Mail, Notes, and more... it will even have a calculator for the first time! But the key star is supposed to be AI technology that will be built throughout the OS including Siri and nearly all Apple apps. WHAT WE ARE NOT HEARING is any significant changes that are iPadOS specific (other than the calculator), so I expect them to hold firm with their current Stage Manager design and I'm not hearing about anything that truly makes the iPad into a direct competitor for MacOS.
Has burn-in been an issue for you on your iPhone. They've been using OLED for years.Any mention of burn in? How to keep the display healthy?
You're making several assumptions that are not proven, and are almost certainly false in the case of iPads.I'm souring on incremental updates and their impact on the environment. Self-proclaimed responsible stewards of the environment shouldn't manufacture barely-different products in a saturated marketplace.
I record a lot of drone footage for work, and edit it together on iPad. Also thinking about trying out Logic Pro, just for fun.Cool.
Curious … what are you planning to do with that powerhouse?
You do realize this is Samsung Display’s sub pixel structure right?
Let Loose of that idea.ZERO mention of battery life w/M4 & the OLED...curious they didn't even mention a typical "even with this new and thinnest design we maintain the same all-day battery life iPad Pro users have come to expect" etc.
They've got a dark grey, not white, magic keyboard to match the iPad. Why not a pencil that matches the iPad?They use white accessories as part of their marketing since the iPod. They want people to instantly know you are using an Apple product. It’s the same reason AirPods are still only white.
incremental updates only hurt the environment when people update every generation. at these prices the percentage of users who do so become vanishingly small. the majority of folks updating to the iPad Pro are coming from devices they purchased 4-6 years ago (or longer.) In used my 2018 iPad Pro for 6 years, and its the fact I bought the high end model that was "overkill" back then that directly led to me be content enough to hold on to it for many years before upgrading today to the new iPad Pro.
Your original statement was "These processors are designed mostly for bursty workloads". That's definitively and totally false.i disagree… iPads are designed for bursty workloads. They dont have active cooling…
Most ipad users are running bursty workloads… no one is running processes at 100 percent CPU for hours on end.. the only situation could be for gaming
If you have a heavy work load you use a Mac
I remember this rumor from 2 years ago. This person doesn't have too bad of a track record with respect to Apple-related leaks. If there's a good time for this to happen, it is this year. The whole tweet thread is interesting.
Let Loose of that idea.No ultra wide camera
2 versions of M4 for 256/512GB and 1TB/2TB ( first time ever that this has happened on iPad)
Still no 4K@120FPS with all that power
….. yeah
To your last point, when I upgraded from my OG iPad Pro it became a music, podcast, and video player in the parrots’ room. Battery is irrelevant since it’s plugged in and I expect to still get many years of use out of it. And should it die in a decade or more I’ll bring it in for recycling.You're making several assumptions that are not proven, and are almost certainly false in the case of iPads.
These iPads are very far from "barely different". They may feel like that to *you* but you are not the only market for these products.
You also assume that replacing an iPad leads to discarding the previously owned iPad. That's often, and probably usually, not the case. If it's still functional, it will be passed to another user or resold. They tend to have very long useful lifetimes, regardless of when the first user replaces them. And it it's not still functional... then it doesn't matter if there's a new version of the iPad out or not, either way it will be replaced.
Has burn-in been an issue for you on your iPhone. They've been using OLED for years.
I thought the purpose of a pilot was to get off the road and into the air. I don't think you're using your plane correctly.My primary travel computer was a 2018 iPad Pro 11-inch LTE model that I use 3-4 days a week on the road as a pilot.
Apparently it is the same.What’s the battery life? Why didn’t they mention that?
The iPad would generally be used for things with a lot more static objects on the screen. Assuming it's used by professionals doing heavy lifting tasks.
At the other end of the potential market, my children leave their screens on, get distracted, walk away, fall asleep, forget about it for hours.
Just interested in what tech they're implementing to try and help.
The processors are designed for bursty workloads… the various power management and sleep/idle states suggest so. This enables great performance and high efficiency, especially for mobile applications.Your original statement was "These processors are designed mostly for bursty workloads". That's definitively and totally false.
As for the iPads, that's true-ish, though getting less so with the copper and graphite in the latest Pros. Like the MacBook Air, they can sustain a decent amount of work. As you say though, 100% CPU for long periods is not happening without better cooling. None of that has anything to do with processor design, though, it's just about cooling.
I'm curious, does anyone have current-gen iPP benchmark numbers for, say, an H.265 export that runs for 30 seconds, versus the same thing looped 100 times? It would be interesting to see how much performance is lost due to throttling over longer jobs. And even more intersting to see how that changes with the new passive cooling in the new IPPs.