Sidebar Sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple CAN’T do AAA gaming [Merged Megathread]

diamond.g said:
So now it isn’t a numbers game?
Click to expand...
… If it was solely a numbers game why’d you even write your last comment?
Obviously it isn’t just about numbers, especially not quantities of vastly different platforms. During its life there have probably been more PS4s than gaming PCs, why’d the devs bother to support Windows?
 
Jeven Stobs said:
… If it was solely a numbers game why’d you even write your last comment?
Obviously it isn’t just about numbers, especially not quantities of vastly different platforms. During its life there have probably been more PS4s than gaming PCs, why’d the devs bother to support Windows?
Click to expand...
That is a good question, how many PS4 exclusives were also released on the PC?

Folks say there isn't enough market share, but there are millions of Macs out in the wild (AS + Intel) but AAA gaming on a Mac is on drip feed.
 
orionquest said:
Yes and GPU options. I was a long time red team, when I switch to Nivida it's was another night vrs day shift. Great cards.
Click to expand...
My first PC was team Red, but I never fully embraced either one as "fanboy". My second one is a GTX card, I just bought what $/performance and performance/watt was best. Right now, I feel it's an either or, but not both anymore.
 
orionquest said:
This thread keeps going in circles. Stop ignoring what has been said and you will have your answer.
Click to expand...
As a card (or is it desktop?) carrying member of PCMR, I feel like Mac users (I am one of those as well) should also be able to enjoy the same games that PCMR folk get to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irishman
diamond.g said:
As a card (or is it desktop?) carrying member of PCMR, I feel like Mac users (I am one of those as well) should also be able to enjoy the same games that PCMR folk get to.
Click to expand...
I don’t think anyone is particularly against that.

These threads usually revolve around bitching at Apple to bring more games to the Mac somehow (and one sad individual who has to prove PC superiority).

I think the answer will always be that the potential profit for treating MacOS as a priority doesn’t outweigh the costs. Credible sources always come back to marketshare.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Colstan and Unregistered 4U
Saying there are millions of Macs is like saying there are millions ofPlaystations. Correct, but how many of those are PS2s and 3s?
I agree that market share alone won't do much if the systems just aren't capable, but hey are increasingly becoming just that. Mx are the start with headroom for years. The age of gaming on Mac might start if, and only if, WWDC this year won't be another marketing gig and focuses on gaming (among other things).
 
JMacHack said:
These threads usually revolve around bitching at Apple to bring more games to the Mac somehow (and one sad individual who has to prove PC superiority).
Click to expand...
This is essentially it. I've tried numerous times in these threads to discuss the topic, but it becomes a circular argument, if not a circular firing squad. To put it more charitably, these threads are support groups for folks who want more of their favorite games on the Mac, which is a sentiment I share, but my personal impact is limited beyond purchasing and playing Mac specific titles, hence supporting the companies who develop for the Mac.

Complaining about it on the MR forums may be cathartic; a way to blow off steam, but Apple isn't going to gobble up "AAA" gaming studios because a few nerds on the internet think they know how to run Apple's business better than the company executives.

As far as people who come here specifically to convert us Mac plebeians to the PC cause, see the light and change our ways, well that's a pointless endeavor, and rather sad. The most important thing to me is being able to run macOS, and that x86 ship sailed long ago. Teraflops and gigahertz are meaningless if you can't run your preferred operating system on that system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ethosik, JMacHack, Homy and 1 other person
jav6454 said:
Yup, not to mention the whole trying to upgrade your gaming setup without having to throw away the entire thing.
Click to expand...

Yeah, but it’s not going to suddenly stop working when you want to upgrade your gaming setup. Who is holding a gun to your head to force you to throw it away? You’ve no doubt heard of resell markets like eBay?

I think you might be worried about nothing.
 
Colstan said:
This is essentially it. I've tried numerous times in these threads to discuss the topic, but it becomes a circular argument, if not a circular firing squad. To put it more charitably, these threads are support groups for folks who want more of their favorite games on the Mac, which is a sentiment I share, but my personal impact is limited beyond purchasing and playing Mac specific titles, hence supporting the companies who develop for the Mac.
Click to expand...
Thats why a lot of “gaming” threads that are started get pulled into this Megathread. They’re all the same discussions over and over again. :)
 
Irishman said:
I’ve no idea what you meant to say, only what you did say.
Click to expand...
With PCs (vast mayority) if you want to upgrade a component, you can. With Macs, in general, you can't as each Mac has soldered in components making it next to impossible.

Hence, with a Mac, if you want better component, you usually have to "throw out" a Mac. In other words, you have to sell it, trade it or give it away. You can't use the same Mac.
 
jav6454 said:
With PCs (vast mayority) if you want to upgrade a component, you can. With Macs, in general, you can't as each Mac has soldered in components making it next to impossible.

Hence, with a Mac, if you want better component, you usually have to "throw out" a Mac. In other words, you have to sell it, trade it or give it away. You can't use the same Mac.
Click to expand...

Are you really suggesting that Macs, in general, are non upgradable? Well, I guess I could have been wrong, but I was so certain that I was using an upgradable tower back in the day, and that was a Mac tower. I mean, you seem so sure that you know what you’re talking about, that Macs can’t be upgraded (RAM, HD, PCI-GPUs).

You wouldn’t be talking out of your rear end, would you?
 
Irishman said:
Are you really suggesting that Macs, in general, are non upgradable? Well, I guess I could have been wrong, but I was so certain that I was using an upgradable tower back in the day, and that was a Mac tower. I mean, you seem so sure that you know what you’re talking about, that Macs can’t be upgraded (RAM, HD, PCI-GPUs).

You wouldn’t be talking out of your rear end, would you?
Click to expand...
Yes that is what they are suggesting and it's a fact the current state of Mac's are not upgradeable. Show us a current mac system which is upgradedable (any of these RAM, HD, or GPU) besides the over engineered and over priced MacPro.

Go on we'll wait.
 
Irishman said:
Are you really suggesting that Macs, in general, are non upgradable? Well, I guess I could have been wrong, but I was so certain that I was using an upgradable tower back in the day, and that was a Mac tower. I mean, you seem so sure that you know what you’re talking about, that Macs can’t be upgraded (RAM, HD, PCI-GPUs).

You wouldn’t be talking out of your rear end, would you?
Click to expand...
Can you upgrade your Mac Studio, Mac mini, iMac, or MacBook line? No, and if you can, marginally. Can you upgrade a Mac Pro? Yes, with limited options.

So yes, my argument stands. Please, do not compare a PC to a Mac in terms of upgradeability. In that respect, the PC market outright wins. Want to swap a desktop CPU? Easy. RAM? Go ahead. SSD? No issues. Add a GPU, just make sure it fits and you have slots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EntropyQ3
Homy said:
Just make sure you have the money to pay for the GPU and the electricity bill for the huge PSU. 😄
Click to expand...
In theory, if one is upgrading a CPU, it's because you already have the required PSU. But yes, I understand your joke. Like back when GTX400 card series required a dedicated 1GW Nuclear Reactor to power it coupled with a dedicated 150 meter high cooling tower to keep it at 100*C.
 
jav6454 said:
Can you upgrade your Mac Studio, Mac mini, iMac, or MacBook line? No, and if you can, marginally. Can you upgrade a Mac Pro? Yes, with limited options.

So yes, my argument stands. Please, do not compare a PC to a Mac in terms of upgradeability. In that respect, the PC market outright wins. Want to swap a desktop CPU? Easy. RAM? Go ahead. SSD? No issues. Add a GPU, just make sure it fits and you have slots.
Click to expand...
I used to "upgrade" iMacs each year, where I'd sell the previous years model and buy the newer version and usually only have to pay less than $1000 each year and in return I'd get the latest CPU, GPU, RAM, SSD, screen upgrades etc.

Upgrading my PC tends to be a domino effect where I'll want a new monitor so I go out and buy an LG OLED and suddenly find out that my 2080 doesn't support HDMI 2.1, so I guess I should buy a 3080 if I want 120hz, and now I see my CPU is bottlenecking it so I should probably pick up an Intel 12th gen, but now I need a new motherboard and RAM and cooler and hmm maybe my PSU isn't powerful enough.... and suddenly I've basically just built a brand new computer and selling the old PC parts is a nightmare compared to selling a used Mac.

That's not to say PCs aren't infinitely more upgradeable than Macs, but just that for more than adding more storage it's not always as plug and play or economical as it sounds.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Irishman
orionquest said:
Yes that is what they are suggesting and it's a fact the current state of Mac's are not upgradeable. Show us a current mac system which is upgradedable (any of these RAM, HD, or GPU) besides the over engineered and over priced MacPro.

Go on we'll wait.
Click to expand...

I won’t allow my discussion into what counts or qualifies as an upgradable Mac tower to be framed by your arbitrary cherry-picking, because pricing notwithstanding, Apple’s tower configurations have always been upgradable in the manner that you’re saying they’re not (because reasons?)

I’m willing to discuss relative pricing issues with comparable PC towers only, not the $1000 starter configuration you can find at any retailer.
 
jav6454 said:
Can you upgrade your Mac Studio, Mac mini, iMac, or MacBook line? No, and if you can, marginally. Can you upgrade a Mac Pro? Yes, with limited options.

So yes, my argument stands. Please, do not compare a PC to a Mac in terms of upgradeability. In that respect, the PC market outright wins. Want to swap a desktop CPU? Easy. RAM? Go ahead. SSD? No issues. Add a GPU, just make sure it fits and you have slots.
Click to expand...

I don’t own a Mac Studio, Mac mini, or MacBook. I do own a late 2012 iMac, which I have upgraded the internal HD to an SSD (specifically a Samsung 2.5” EVO one). It was like buying a new Mac, honestly!

Please, provide some documentation for your assertion, because all you’ve done is state your opinion on the matter. Do you accept that there are more legitimate views than those who agree with you?

As I said earlier in this thread, I have bought with my own money an upgradable Mac tower.

Have you? How much experience with gaming on the Mac do you have?
 
Irishman said:
Are you really suggesting that Macs, in general, are non upgradable? Well, I guess I could have been wrong, but I was so certain that I was using an upgradable tower back in the day, and that was a Mac tower. I mean, you seem so sure that you know what you’re talking about, that Macs can’t be upgraded (RAM, HD, PCI-GPUs).
Click to expand...
jav6454 said:
Can you upgrade your Mac Studio, Mac mini, iMac, or MacBook line? No, and if you can, marginally. Can you upgrade a Mac Pro? Yes, with limited options.
Click to expand...
In an attempt to find some comity in this argument, you are both right.

During the Intel era, Macs were reasonably upgradable. I've owned four Mac minis, and I did upgrades to each of them. I replaced the hard drive and memory in the PPC unit, then both of those, along the CPU, in the first Intel model, then the memory again in a 2011 mini, and now I've added an eGPU and replaced the RAM in my 2018 Mac mini.

That's all in the past. With the move to Apple Silicon, the Mac is now much more a black box, hidden within untold wizardry and driven by fell magic. Apple isn't locking down the Mac to be mean, they are doing it because of the substantial benefits it provides. It gives all of the components of the SoC, such as the CPU and GPU, equal access to the high-speed on-package system memory. It reduces complexity by putting the SSD controller and other logic on-board. It significantly reduces latency because data doesn't need to be shuttled around from different components on the motherboard. That also means fewer points of failure that might require warranty service. This is the implementation of Apple's historical vertical integration strategy that Steve Jobs could have only dreamed of for the Mac.

There are real, tangible benefits to the consumer, and fits in with Apple's business model and engineering philosophy. The downside is that we can no longer replace various components, but system upgrades are already a niche market done by us nerds, and the benefits outweigh losing that capability, even for those of us who have done that in the past.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back