Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
To all of the straight, white, cisgender people who are posting “who cares?” the answer is anyone who has been misrepresented, marginalised or overlooked by the media as a matter of course.

Looking at the diversity of the Fortune 500, specifically at those groups which are not straight or closeted, white men who identify with their birth gender, I see 6 Black CEOs (1.2%), 9 Asian CEOs (1.8%), 10 Latino CEOs (2%) and 24 female CEOs (4.8%) and now 1 openly LGBT CEO (.2%). The power rests in heterosexual, white male, cisgender hands, something which does not reflect the population in general.

White people make up 63.7% of the US population, Latino 16.4%, Black 12.2% and Asians 4.7%, Native Americans make up .7%, Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders .2%, people who identify as mixed race 1.9% and .2% of another racial identity. 3.8% of Americans identify as LGBTQA, and of course 50.9% of Americans identify as Female.

Were the Fortune 500 to genutinely reflect this, you would see; 319 White CEOs, 61 Black CEOs, 24 Asian CEOs, 4 Native American CEOs, 1 Hawaiian Pacific Islander, 10 people of mixed racial backgrounds and 1 person of another race. Of these 255 would be Female and 245 Male (overlooking the incidence of intersex or non-binary gender as I couldn’t find adequate statistics on this), there would also be 19 openly LGBTQA people in this list.

The current list being so vastly dominated by a single demographic, one which would make up approximately 30% a random sample of Americans means that queer kids, ethnic minority kids and girls don’t see CEO of a major company as an achievable goal, they are discouraged by the status quo.

Even the slightest amount of representation can change the viewpoint of people; can show someone that no, they don’t need to be closeted if they want to go into business, they don’t need to “act white” or accept a bum deal because of their gender identity. Tim Cook’s coming out is not a “so what”, it is a huge deal for a lot of people. Those who resist the idea or question its relevance are part of a gradually eroding system of repression with ever increasingly outdated viewpoints.

I guess that when you can literally turn on any TV, anywhere in the world and place a safe bet that you will be able to find a story that is about people like you, you get complacent. Being able to open a newspaper and not read debates about why your rights are a “hot political talking point” or a piece of key policy must be nice. Hell, I bet you can even walk into a bookshop and find that the entire romance section is full of stories about relationships between a man and a woman, because thankfully anything else been cordoned off in their own special section.

The reason it is important that celebrities, that figures in the media come out is not out of a desire to seek further celebration and inflation of their egos. I imagine it is the same as anyones reason to come out; to have their sexuality visible. This visibility can be personally relieving, no more dodging questions about “the man in your life” but in the case of celebrities, it can have a much bigger affect. People, especially young people, are constantly seeking out role models and learning that a role model is gay can have profound effects on a developing person. It can easily show them that something they have absorbed through societies microaggressions as bad is perfectly normal, or it can help them to learn and accept something about themselves.

For queer kids who feel isolated, as if nobody else has ever had the feelings they do, I don’t believe that a straight person could ever begin to conceive the comfort that seeing someone “like me” on television, in film or in the news can bring. Its as simple as knowing that you aren’t alone. It doesn’t even have to be a real person, a character in a TV show or comic can be enough. The LGBT struggle for civil rights, and for the opportunity not to be bullied, overlooked or “accepted but not condoned” is reinforced with every Alan Cummings, Ellen Page, Michael Sam or Tim Cook who makes the frankly terrifying decision to go public with their sexuality, and with every Laverne Cox, Laura Jane Grace, Carmen Carrera or Andreja Pejić who shows that they can be a beautiful, powerful woman in the public eye regardless of people’s transphobia or bigotry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WalkerTexasRanger
yes there is

Well name them....


Sodomy laws in the United States were largely a matter of state rather than federal jurisdiction, except for laws governing the U.S. Armed Forces. In 1963, the penalties for sodomy in the various states varied from imprisonment for two to ten years and/or a fine of US$2,000.[42] By 2002, 36 states had repealed all sodomy laws or had them overturned by court rulings. The remaining sodomy laws were invalidated by the 2003 U.S. Supreme Court decision Lawrence v. Texas.
 
I'm not doubting more people are open to gay marriage. However the truth is the politicians are the ones who allowed it in their states. The people did not vote on it. There's a difference.

Thank you for sharing that info and I'm sorry for the misinformation. I'll pay more attention to news from now on:)
 
I think this is a very private guy in a very public job, and he wants to be open about it and move on. While this is not the only thing that defines Tim, he clearly wants to be honest about it. Otherwise, it might seem like he is trying to hide something, or he is somehow ashamed of who he is. Nobody should have to lie about who they are. That's just too big of a canoe to carry around. Especially, for a public figure.

Good for Tim.
 
Sorry buddy, one day you'll wake up and find you've been living on the wrong side of history, and the wrong side of morality. I feel sorry for you.

YOU and your two buddies with their thumbs up will wake up and find that YOU are on the wrong side. Period.

Everyone who thinks as you will find he has some skeletons in his closet that made him think the way he does. This goes for those duck hunters, too.
 
For those who don't think this matters - it does. It matters because to someone like me, a gay youth, it shows that being gay does not limt my ability to do great things in life. That's so important to me.
 
It's not a surprise to anybody who follows Apple. Please go back to business and fix the WiFi connectivity problem with iOS8.
 
So then please tell me what being gay has to do with technology and computing?
Why is the CEO of apple obliged to talk about sexuality?


If you cannot see there is an agenda then you are just plain ignorant. You don't have to be 'homophobic' to identify this clear agenda.

If it's so clear, why don't the rest of us see it?
 
What the hell is "cisgender?"

Cisgender is when you identify your gender with your biological sex.

I.e. My biological sex is male, and I identify my gender as male, so I am cisgender.

There's also transgender (biologically x but Identify as y) and agender (biologically x but identify as no gender).
 
His several thousand year old book of fairy tales says there's only one god and everyone else's several thousand year old book of fairy tales is wrong!

If you're going to go fishing, you need to use a more subtle lure.
 
I really don't mind this news. I've always liked Tim Cook and respected him even when Jobs was still around. But I must ask, what is it with everyone having to come out and declare their sexuality? Why does it matter? Those were my only questions. Not judging anyone for doing this, I just do not understand it.

B
 
Excuse me, but what religious people are making Tim Cooks life miserable?

The reality is that the homosexual movement does not want equality. They ALREADY have that in the US. Discrimination is illegal. The true agenda is that they want everyone to tell them "its ok" and affirm it.

I am not taking a side here either way but if someone has an opinion, religious or not, they are entitled to it. They are not required to tell someone else that what they are doing is ok.

This is untrue, very unfortunate.

There are a lot of rights and benefits of partnerships and marriage that homosexual individuals are barred from. The right to marry for example is still illegal in many states for homosexuals. This prevents them from a lot.

Imagine, from a straight perspective. being told that the love of your life, you weren't allowed to 'marry'. you were not allowed shared benefits. shared tax information. you were not allowed doing couples things and even walking down the street holding hands you were mocked and laughed at or called "disgusting".

this what gays still deal with on a daily basis. have we come a long way since the past towards promoting equality? yes. But we still have far far far way to go.
 
To all of the straight, white, cisgender people who are posting “who cares?” the answer is anyone who has been misrepresented, marginalised or overlooked by the media as a matter of course.

Looking at the diversity of the Fortune 500, specifically at those groups which are not straight or closeted, white men who identify with their birth gender, I see 6 Black CEOs (1.2%), 9 Asian CEOs (1.8%), 10 Latino CEOs (2%) and 24 female CEOs (4.8%) and now 1 openly LGBT CEO (.2%). The power rests in heterosexual, white male, cisgender hands, something which does not reflect the population in general.

White people make up 63.7% of the US population, Latino 16.4%, Black 12.2% and Asians 4.7%, Native Americans make up .7%, Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders .2%, people who identify as mixed race 1.9% and .2% of another racial identity. 3.8% of Americans identify as LGBTQA, and of course 50.9% of Americans identify as Female.

Were the Fortune 500 to genutinely reflect this, you would see; 319 White CEOs, 61 Black CEOs, 24 Asian CEOs, 4 Native American CEOs, 1 Hawaiian Pacific Islander, 10 people of mixed racial backgrounds and 1 person of another race. Of these 255 would be Female and 245 Male (overlooking the incidence of intersex or non-binary gender as I couldn’t find adequate statistics on this), there would also be 19 openly LGBTQA people in this list.

The current list being so vastly dominated by a single demographic, one which would make up approximately 30% a random sample of Americans means that queer kids, ethnic minority kids and girls don’t see CEO of a major company as an achievable goal, they are discouraged by the status quo.

Even the slightest amount of representation can change the viewpoint of people; can show someone that no, they don’t need to be closeted if they want to go into business, they don’t need to “act white” or accept a bum deal because of their gender identity. Tim Cook’s coming out is not a “so what”, it is a huge deal for a lot of people. Those who resist the idea or question its relevance are part of a gradually eroding system of repression with ever increasingly outdated viewpoints.

I guess that when you can literally turn on any TV, anywhere in the world and place a safe bet that you will be able to find a story that is about people like you, you get complacent. Being able to open a newspaper and not read debates about why your rights are a “hot political talking point” or a piece of key policy must be nice. Hell, I bet you can even walk into a bookshop and find that the entire romance section is full of stories about relationships between a man and a woman, because thankfully anything else been cordoned off in their own special section.

The reason it is important that celebrities, that figures in the media come out is not out of a desire to seek further celebration and inflation of their egos. I imagine it is the same as anyones reason to come out; to have their sexuality visible. This visibility can be personally relieving, no more dodging questions about “the man in your life” but in the case of celebrities, it can have a much bigger affect. People, especially young people, are constantly seeking out role models and learning that a role model is gay can have profound effects on a developing person. It can easily show them that something they have absorbed through societies microaggressions as bad is perfectly normal, or it can help them to learn and accept something about themselves.

For queer kids who feel isolated, as if nobody else has ever had the feelings they do, I don’t believe that a straight person could ever begin to conceive the comfort that seeing someone “like me” on television, in film or in the news can bring. Its as simple as knowing that you aren’t alone. It doesn’t even have to be a real person, a character in a TV show or comic can be enough. The LGBT struggle for civil rights, and for the opportunity not to be bullied, overlooked or “accepted but not condoned” is reinforced with every Alan Cummings, Ellen Page, Michael Sam or Tim Cook who makes the frankly terrifying decision to go public with their sexuality, and with every Laverne Cox, Laura Jane Grace, Carmen Carrera or Andreja Pejić who shows that they can be a beautiful, powerful woman in the public eye regardless of people’s transphobia or bigotry.

I was getting ready to post something like this, but I don't think I could have done it as eloquently as you have. Thank you :)
 
Who in the hell cares and what the hell does this have to do with making computers and mobile devices???

This is the kind of crap that makes me mad. Someone using their high position as a business person to push a personal agenda. Just do your job Cook and leave your personal life at home. I don't need it in my face.

I wouldn't say he's pushing his personal life in your face - far from it.
He's simply in support of equality.
And it makes it a lot easier for people coming out to say "Me too"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.