Topolsky is a blowhard that has been fired from his three or four past jobs
I actually didn’t mind him when he was at engadget and verge, he was the biggest apple apologist
Topolsky is a blowhard that has been fired from his three or four past jobs
Yep. Hate how the pencil works for battery and charging.Anyone who questions the pencil charging has never been in a meeting and had his/her pencil die with no other way to charge it.
AirPods are off and charging
in the case, the pencil wakes up every time I move my bag and wastes battery. A better solution will include inductive charging from the iPad itself but we’re just not there yet.
The notch is ugly as hell. And, I will never buy a phone that has it.Josh is great, but the notch is something that will be accepted in time and will be an iconic part of iPhones going forward. Design is often so subjective.
“The justification for the notch (the new Face ID tech, which lets you unlock the device just by looking at it) could have easily been accomplished with no visual break in the display.”
Immediate fail. I read the rest but at this point, we know who we’re dealing with. An armchair engineer with no clue about manufacturing, whining because he doesn’t like the design.
Agreed, Topolosky is a dork and an armchair engineer. He doesn't know what he's talking about. But, the implication here is that Apple 'should' know how to do the iPhone X without a notch, and they didn't. They didn't not because it's not possible, but because it's no longer possible at Apple right now with Tim pipeline Cook leading it.
iPhone X is a bad design. You can discuss about it, being angry about it, but it’s true.
and as 90% of people here will reply -
"well, it's just your subjective opinion blah blah blah.. doesn't bother me at all blah blah..
Yeah, everything is subjective, but being critical is a good thing. It shows that we care.
Let me show you something. There is a historical school building in Czech Republic, which was recently thermaly rehabilated. It became a very discussed subject here in Czech Republic, because the insulation practically destroyed the building. Yet there are still people that think it’s ok. It’s not! The truth is not always in the middle.
The iPhone X is a bad design, but we can get use to it.
Yeah, everything is subjective, but being critical is a good thing. It shows that we care.
Let me show you something. There is a historical school building in Czech Republic, which was recently thermaly rehabilated. It became a very discussed subject here in Czech Republic, because the insulation practically destroyed the building. Yet there are still people that think it’s ok. It’s not! The truth is not always in the middle.
The iPhone X is a bad design, but we can get use to it.
Topolsky is a blowhard that has been fired from his three or four past jobs
Except for the fact he’s right. The notch only becomes a necessity when the requirement to have no top/bottom bezel is the overriding driver in the design.“The justification for the notch (the new Face ID tech, which lets you unlock the device just by looking at it) could have easily been accomplished with no visual break in the display.”
Immediate fail. I read the rest but at this point, we know who we’re dealing with. An armchair engineer with no clue about manufacturing, whining because he doesn’t like the design.
So your only contribution is an argumentum ad hominem?
Apple could have easily implemented FaceID into the top bezel, sacrificing display size. Instead, they sacrificed screen shape. His point is that it’s a poor design that could have been implemented in numerous ways without messing with the shape of the display.“The justification for the notch (the new Face ID tech, which lets you unlock the device just by looking at it) could have easily been accomplished with no visual break in the display.”
Immediate fail. I read the rest but at this point, we know who we’re dealing with. An armchair engineer with no clue about manufacturing, whining because he doesn’t like the design.
Design is subjective and people reacting to it short term without being properly hands-on doesn’t mean it is 'wrong'. Too many people applying absolute, objective statements which is crazy
Lots of cars are like this - when there are model changes, poepel often react negatively to the new look because they are familiar with the existing one. But after a few months with the new model out, it becomes accepted and even starts to make the previous model look 'old', therefore encouraging people to upgrade.
I like that they’re taking this approach personally. The 'ears' functionally provide more usable real estate for apps vs a hard bezel, because the status bar now doesnt take up space - being moved up into the ears.
The only question mark really is down to 'why didn’t they colour it to match the notch'. That is just people trying to map the design to their familiarity of old design being solid bezels. When you are on the lock or home screen it makes sense not to be black so you can see more of your wallpaper reaching all the way to the top of the screen. Also logically it isn’t ideal to always be black as it would wear the OLED screen unevenly.
I'm sure people will quickly get used to it (and also people will quickly design wallpapers with black bars to 'force' a solid bezel). It’s the hyperbolic statements I find a little surprising
You will be able to reduce the notch’s impact (while still wasting precious screen real estate) , but until Apple updates its software to blend the notch into the status bar, there’s no getting around it.
can i get your premission to add this bit?
Either way (current notch or Black blending) the top portion of the display is being utilized (in portrait mode). You’re not wasting space by blending the status bar into the rest of the display.
opposed to a thin bezel with the cameras etc. above the display? :/