well CrossOvers version to be precise with Apple specific patches (i.a. for DirectX12)They didn't develop anything, this is the open source Wine project rebranded.
well CrossOvers version to be precise with Apple specific patches (i.a. for DirectX12)They didn't develop anything, this is the open source Wine project rebranded.
Thats a great point. From a cost stand point Apple still has a lot of capable Macs that can play some content adequately, but still you are paying a lot more if you invest in a high performance based Max/Ultra based Macs. IMHO they should look at how games running in crossover porting environment perform on more less expensive M2 Pro Macs which is likely to be a lot more in use.The prize are 'gamers' the gaming community itself likes to sometimes pretend don't exist. People who love gaming but don't necessarily care about (or can afford) the latest GPU or whether it runs at 4k at 120 FPS. However, as impressive as performance already on high-end Apple hardware may be, the benchmark are the M1 and M2 MacBook Airs. Apple sells a lot of these and if you only target folks with MacBook Pros, Studios or now Mac Pros you're missing out on quite a lot of market.
Does anyone else feel enabling gaming on Mac cheapens the brand?
The games that are native already run so great, and I'm on the M1 Max. I can play most, if not all, of my Mac games at full resolution on my Studio Display at ultra settings. I'll start taking note of what games I might notice slow downs and stuff, but a lot of these people don't realize the power Apple Silicon has. It's blown my mind. My PC has a 6900XT and my M1 Max keeps up.My M2 Max with 38 GPU cores is better than RTX 3070. AAA Games are running extremely well.
but this is exactly the good part, this avoids the OS/2 trap.Don’t get your hopes up. Listen to this take from the Linus WAN show yesterday. Ultra-short version: Apple did very little, it’s not a translator, and this still requires developers to do a full port.
Um.... yeah ... in the event you actually had source code there would be this whole industrial espionage, copyright infringement and a dozen other illegal acts involved so....Can users use it to run windows games on Mac? Or do you have to prove you developed the game?
Apple's toolkit is just CrossOver 22.1.1 with patches applied to support DirectX 12 games.
Copyright infringement. Theft of intellectual property.If Apple developed an emulator that is good enough to run games on, why are we still messing around with dual computers or Parallels?
Why not just release this like Rosetta.
Exactly what I was thinking. Apple actually did do some development to get it working properly. Interestingly, CrossOver even released a PR statement about it and said they were still working on theirs but it was coming in their next version, but not the exact same support like what Apple did. So to me that says obviously Apple worked on this on their own, building upon what CrossOver had. I wonder if this had anything to do with Parallels claiming it wasn't possible to do DX12. At least that's what they told me. So I canceled my Parallels sub since I couldn't play new games. lol.well CrossOvers version to be precise with Apple specific patches (i.a. for DirectX12)
Not at all. Some of us don't want or need multiple computers, but would like to do some gaming along with dev or office work. I don't want a serious gaming machine, but I do want flexibility and performance. Most of all is prefer to stay on Mac instead of looking for a different *nix environment as my main desktop.
Exactly! Here's an statement by them, and even they say they only have preliminary DX12 support.Well, it's more than that and actually pretty huge. Apple easily did something Codeweavers haven't been able to. The solution Codeweavers are working on is per title and not for general purpose. They have to work their way trhough every single title which will be very time consuming and expensive. Apple's solution works for every game. Of course some games would need more optimization but it's not as resource consuming as Codeweavers' current solution.
One Apple engineer said ”We built a dxil to metallib converter and directx11 and directx12 to Metal runtime translator. Non graphics APIs are translated by Wine. But we don’t use any tech from moltenVK or DXVK or spirv-cross etc. The shader converter can be shipped by games and can be used in the game developer asset pipelines.”
Most people want hundreds of AAA games via subscriptions, not buy one by one individually.
![]()
Xbox Game Pass Games Library | Xbox
Explore the Game Pass library and play hundreds of games.www.xbox.com
The eGPU support stopped at AMD 6 series. I don't see this gaming stuff being successful on macs. Gamers like modding the bios, overclocking, upgrading rams and gpu, a flexibility that doesn't exist with macs. Still macs are great for productivity and editing not for serious gaming.
This makes no sense. You can already do this on Parallels or Boot camp (Intel Macs). Furthermore, I don’t think gaming companies would take issue with selling more products whatever OS they’re running on.Copyright infringement. Theft of intellectual property.
A PC game is licensed to run on Windows.... the law suits.... and the fact that so many comments like this are floating around this thread....
Andoverpricedexpensive storage, low end macs starts at 256GB, that's pretty much useless for gaming, so if they are serious about gaming, they have to allow M.2 storage as Sony / Microsoft did for their consoles.
No kidding. My 4070 absolutely crushes my M1 Pro 14" in terms of raw graphics compute.
The biggest battle for Apple here is that they are fighting a monopoly , this is never easy to accomplish (duopoly in the best case) , Windows is putting money behind its gaming efforts , buying up studios left right and center with Activision blizzard incoming as well , Sony also had a shopping spree , this alone is hampering the biggest AAA titles from coming to the Mac.
Getting GTA6 must be a top priority for Apple , this game alone will put them on the map as it will be the biggest selling game of all time by a wide margin when it comes out.
People who are considered 'gamers' that do not have any exposure to Macs today are not going to come to a Mac tomorrow because they can play games on it.
They won't come because the devices are too expensive and can't be upgraded.
Mac's and gaming, it will never become a thing.
Less so now than in years gone by. That said, even I (Apples worst critic) do think the value is better than it has ever been.Except that people in forums like this, think that macs are well priced.
You could use thunderbolt enclosures up to 40 Gbps speed of course not the same as an M.2 slot. Btw most macs aren't good for serious gaming but perfect for video/audio editing and browsing the web.Andoverpricedexpensive storage, low end macs starts at 256GB, that's pretty much useless for gaming, so if they are serious about gaming, they have to allow M.2 storage as Sony / Microsoft did for their consoles.
This is what a lot of people in these gaming threads seem to ignore. It's always "AAA...but AAA games!!!!!". Not every single game on the planet needs to be AAA. The Nintendo Switch handles games very well, and doesn't get all AAA games either. Ever since I got into Macs 20+ years ago, it's always been this constant "talking down to Mac owners" mentality because it doesn't compete with the flagship NVIDIA GPU. Neither does the Switch!!!! The Switch doesn't even compete with Macs hardware, yet it gets more stuff!
It all comes down to marketshare. Wii U was a failure. Wii had more third party support than Wii U because the U version was not as popular. Nintendo Switch is insanely popular so it has good enough marketshare for developers to at least notice it and think about in most cases. Mac? Barely a blip in the gaming sphere in terms of marketshare. It gets ignored or is WAY WAY down the priority list (as is with the game I am making). Games target Xbox/Playstation first, then port to Windows in nearly 90% of the cases. Not because it's "so ungodly easy to develop on this and Mac is HORRIBLE to develop on", but because of marketshare.
The most popular GPU on Steam is not the 4090, or even the top 5 GPUs are even 40xx series last I checked. I think there is ONE 30xx maybe in the top 5 that is the 3060?
Apple could offer developers Apple Arcade as well as App Store, along with selling through other ways.Most people want hundreds of AAA games via subscriptions, not buy one by one individually.
![]()
Xbox Game Pass Games Library | Xbox
Explore the Game Pass library and play hundreds of games.www.xbox.com
pretty close... have you played COD mobile with a controller and headset its pretty sweetLet me attempt to get some clarity here. How close are we to playing Call of Duty on a Mac.