My bad…Not sure how this relates to the post you’re replying to?
My bad…Not sure how this relates to the post you’re replying to?
Where? I haven’t had a phone subsidized by a carrier since like the iPhone 5Most people’s phone are subsidized by carrier. AVP is not.
Like free iPhone with credits in 36 months.Where? I haven’t had a phone subsidized by a carrier since like the iPhone 5
I don’t think Apple expects users to do this. They probably just want to get ahead of the perception people have of VR being a self-isolating experience and differentiate VP from other headsets that are focused on virtual immersion.This is the weirdest thing I’ve ever seen from Apple. They honestly expect people to walk around in their daily routine with that heavy device strapped to their heads? We’re a decade away from a version of the Vision Pro that makes this commercial realistic.
I guess Apple expects everyone in a family to purchase their own set to enjoy it as a family. No thanks.Running visualization and design apps looks intriguing, but I still can't imagine preferring to watch a movie this way, as opposed to watching on a big-screen TV sitting with my family.
But isn't that why Apple's gone to the lengths of having an outward facing screen linked to inward-facing cameras? That additional hardware is there for the sole purpose of projecting a real-time video feed of your eyes outwardly to everyone around you. It's two-way transparency.It is though. Obscuring your face (especially your eyes) the way this does is actually a pretty big deal for humans. It's the same reason it can be hard to read someone who's wearing dark sunglasses, or why people who don't meet your gaze in a conversation seem awkward or untrustworthy. This is a fundamental part of human interaction and communication that we've cultivated over thousands or millions of years.
I get that it's cool to position yourself as the super-casual, forward-thinking guy who can out-logic their own evolutionary coding like it's no big deal, but that doesn't get away from the fact this is going to make interacting with die-hard goggle people pretty awkward.
Have you even tried transparency on AirPods pro or max?because they don’t need to hear outside at that moment
I would totally find it useful to see my packing list in a heads up display as I run around gathering stuff to pack! Plus an interesting video playing as I fold clothes etc. If I had a VP, I would use it while I do all my most mundane chores.“Just packing my suitcase while wearing the Vision Pro & battery pack…ya know…just to enhance that whole experience.…and, in case someone calls I don’t want to just answer with my iPhone!”
Marketing team is really stretching it on that use-case scenario 😬 🤣
that’s a convenient way to pause the music to hear outside, not the purpose to wear headphone.Have you even tried transparency on AirPods pro or max?
You're in for a surprise: It lives up to its name.
Yup, of course that's why they've done that, but it's still an obvious digital representation of eyes (at least based on everything I've seen and heard, maybe that will change with the detailed reviews).But isn't that why Apple's gone to the lengths of having an outward facing screen linked to inward-facing cameras? That additional hardware is there for the sole purpose of projecting a real-time video feed of your eyes outwardly to everyone around you. It's two-way transparency.
Admittedly I don't know how effective it all works in real life (haven't had a chance to try it) but I can't imagine Apple going to all that trouble for a dud.
No positioning here - can't be bothered with all that.
That's not transparency. Transparency works while the music is playing.that’s a convenient way to pause the music to hear outside, not the purpose to wear headphone.
Ok, but that’s not the point. People wear headphones for music, that lady was wearing AVP for nothingThat's not transparency. Transparency works while the music is playing.
If I had a VP, I would use it while I do all my most mundane chores.
You were the one making the point.Ok, but that’s not the point. People wear headphones for music, that lady was wearing AVP for nothing
I “think” there should be AR apps on iPhone that can do what you said. AVP will be much much more immersive of courseI love that! Wearing the AVP while ironing clothes and folding laundry.
I'm going to remodel my bathroom in the coming months and have been (3D) modeling the new bathroom in SketchUp. I would love the ability to walk into the existing bathroom and have the Apple Vision Pro superimpose the new layout and fixtures over the existing walls as I walk through the bathroom. 🤯
Imagine doing that with any kind of home renovation or even an entire new-home build. That would be insane.
(I'm sure it's been done on other VR headsets, but I fully anticipate a much richer experience with the AVP.)
Yeah, I think the FaceTime avatars are synthesized - and I do have I doubts about how acceptable an experience that will be. But AFAIK, the outward projection of the wearer's eyes is a faithful reproduction.Yup, of course that's why they've done that, but it's still an obvious digital representation of eyes (at least based on everything I've seen and heard, maybe that will change with the detailed reviews).
Even with the decent transparency options on headphones today, it's still generally considered pretty rude to leave your earbuds in or your headphones on while talking to people. I personally see the robot eyes to be along the lines of face-timing someone who's sitting across the table from your because you can't be bothered to look away from your phone. I'm sure for basic interactions it'll be fine, but the way some people here talk about how they plan to essentially live in them I imagine there's going to be some real awkwardness.
At 0:23 the lady was packing/unpacking luggage with AVR on her head before she received a call. Isn’t it? If she scheduled that call, it is more understandable but still overkill, if it is unscheduled, I have zero idea why she wore it.You were the one making the point.
Rewatch that part of the video. Look around the periphery. Turn up the volume.
Not sure what else to suggest - the clues are all there.
At 0:23 the lady was packing/unpacking luggage with AVR on her head before she received a call. Isn’t it? If she scheduled that call, it is more understandable but still overkill, if it is unscheduled, I have zero idea why she wore it.
um…. wear that to play something in background and glance? It is possible , just I don’t know if I will do that unless this thing is super comfortable and dead stable while I move around …Have you never had a show/video playing in the periphery while doing chores? Personally I do that all the time and glance at the screen if I hear some interesting bits. On the VP you can basically do the same thing while having that video go with you as move around doing other things. I think it’s a perfectly suitable scenario.
What about those of us who can't sit down with our families to watch a movie on a big-screen TV, because they died in an horrific car crash and we were the sole survivor? Or because mummy and daddy are serving life sentences in prison for molesting our baby brother who ran away and has never been seen again.Running visualization and design apps looks intriguing, but I still can't imagine preferring to watch a movie this way, as opposed to watching on a big-screen TV sitting with my family.