Another thought - I see an analogy to a tug of war team - you get a cadence - a heave (a pull to higher prices in some years - like the X) then a bit of relaxation (kind of like the Xr). With that idea, you can probably expect higher 'value' iPads next year.
I hope Microsoft/Google/??? can use these windows to come out with competitive products...
I have a problem with "value" iPads. It means that Apple is raising the prices of the mainstream products and offering old tech for the price it used to charge for the mainstream products. I will never buy "value" products, but I am not happy either with Apple constantly raising the prices of the premium products up to the point they become nearly unaffordable.
[doublepost=1541070989][/doublepost]
No they don't.
iPad Pro 12.9" 1st gen (2015) started at $799 with 32 gigs.
iPad Pro 12.9" 2nd gen (2017) started at $799 with 64 gigs.
iPad (1st gen) started at $499.
iPad 2 started at $499.
iPad "3" started at $499.
iPad 4 started at $499.
iPad Air started at $499.
iPad Air 2 started at $499. (I fixed a mistake here earlier.)
iPad 5th gen started at $329.
iPad 6th gen started at $329.
iPad Pro 9.7" started at $599 w/32 gigs.
iPad Pro 10.5" started at $649 w/64 gigs, a modest price bump for a much faster device w/twice the storage. I didn't even bother going into included storage on the earlier block of iPads.
For the cases where the prices were level, due to inflation, $499 was actually worth significantly more in previous years than in later years. So, by the time you went from original iPad to iPad Air, even though the $ amount was the same, the latter effectively cost less.
This is what Apple wants consumers to think. My list would be different:
iPad (1st gen) started at $499 in 2010
iPad (2nd gen) started at $499 in 2011
iPad (3rd gen) started at $499 in 2012
iPad (4th gen) started at $499 in 2012
iPad Air started at $499 in 2013
iPad Air 2 started at $499 in 2014
iPad Pro (1st gen) started at $599 in 2015
iPad Pro (2nd gen) started at $649 in 2017
iPad Pro (3rd gen) started at $799 in 2018
The iPad Pro is the successor to the original iPad and in the same line of upgrades. Upgrades are expected to add features, and this is what Apple did. Apple changes the name for marketing reasons. The 3rd gen iPad was called "new iPad". Then the iPad was called iPad Air and, finally, iPad Pro. It's all marketing. OK, the iPad Pro has more features than the original iPad. Of course it does. It is supposed to. It must have. This is the whole point of upgrading, and of tech advance.
The so-called 5th gen iPad was only released in 2017, so it cannot possibly be the successor of the Air 2, which was released in 2014, two and a half years before. The 5th-gen iPad is part of a line of "value" iPads, which replaced the older models which Apple used to keep. As Apple would not use the chassis of the old iPad Air 2 in the new products (the "Pro" line was upgraded with the 10.5" screen), it made sense for it to give a slight bump in the processor and call it as if it were a new product. However, two years and a half later, a small bump in speed, and no upgrade to the screen or to the chassis, is nearly no upgrade at all.
In fact, Apple DID increase the prices. The 9.7" 5th and 6th gen iPads are just leftovers of the old iPad line which Apple is giving slight upgrades to get rid of these parts which were not used at the time.
[doublepost=1541071809][/doublepost]
What USD is considered rich in Brazil? You have me interested in how things are there since you live there. 600 USD a month is insane. Why does your government have such high import taxes?
It depends on the point of view. You have to consider that the exchange rate does not help, and that the cost of living in a city such as São Paulo or Rio de Janeiro is lower, in most part, than New York or Los Angeles.
There is huge social inequality in Brazil. If you ask the majority of the population, then they will say that USD 5,000 a month is a dream salary. However, if you ask the 1% wealthiest population, and which has access to education, they will generally say that they are middle-class. A research conducted with executives in São Paulo a few years ago concluded that the general perception was that a rich person would have a monthly income of at least USD 75,000. Given the high taxes in Brazil, to be reasonably rich you would really need to earn far more than USD 1 million a year.
The government charges high taxes for two reasons.
First, the governmental structure is heavily inflated. Millions of public servants, and billions of dollars wasted every year. Plus, the government used to finance large companies, and wasted well over USD 100 billion in the largest corruption scandal in the world ever, which resulted in a former president in jail and another one being impeached (
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...his-the-biggest-corruption-scandal-in-history). All that costs a lot of money, and the money must come from somewhere.
Second, the government charges high taxes on the imports for protectionism. As taxes are generally so high, imports would compete with Brazilian products. So, the government imposes very heavy taxes on imports (over 100% on electronics) so they will not eat into the profits of Brazilian companies.