When you compare the specs of the iPad Air and the 10th Gen there really isn’t much to separate them. M1 and laminated display are the two things I recall. Any other differences are extremely marginal. Oh, yeah, the colour options are somewhat different.
I really can‘t get Apple’s reasoning here. The 9th Gen was/is a great bang-for-the buck tablet that really undermined Samsung’s offerings for a 10in. tablet—spend just a bit more (in some cases) or even spend the same and get a better device than what Samsung offers. All Samsung has to offer is expandable storage.
Now Apple just threw that away. Yes, it’s still a better device than the competition, but now you have to pay a lot more for it. It smacks of arrogance and no discernible justification because there’s nothing really new about the 10th Gen. It’s a parts bin device—largely an iPad Air, but with a couple of different pieces.
The question nagging me is: what will Apple do when the stock of 9th Gens are gone?
We’ve seen this before. Several years ago the old MacBook Air hangs around, without price reduction, after a new MacBook Air (current chassis) is introduced. When the old MBA was finally discontinued the then new MBA got a price reduction to its present cost where it remains even after the significant upgrade with the M1. Now a new MBA with M2 is introduced while the current M1 MBA remains available. I suspect history will repeat itself when the current M1 MBA is eventually discontinued and the M2 MBA slots into its place with a likely price drop.
Are we going to see this scenario play out again between the 9th and 10th Gen iPads?