Don’t get them wet. lolI have the same of each of these. I really like the feel of them.
Don’t get them wet. lolI have the same of each of these. I really like the feel of them.
Cows are valuable down to the bone. No cows are being killed for JUST their leather.Been wondering about this.
No animal gets killed for leather.
So really it's a choice of lettiing their skin rot in the ground to be eaten by bugs, or making leather products out of it...
Not sure which one the dead cows prefer - if I had to take a guess, I'd say they don't really care. Since they're dead.
Also - please correct me if I am wrong - maybe there are animals that get killed for leather in which case, I'd be absolutely against it.
13 Pro Max Leather caseWhich version was it? My iPhone 11 leather case was pretty terrible, but my 13 has been pretty good. There are specks where the extremely thin leather has worn away, but overall its still in decent shape after a little over a year.
Responding to the overall theme, its easy to put this into two camps, one where we gleefully kill a cow for their skin, and the other where we are ensuring we use all of an animal after it has died. Apple isn't doing themselves any favors with their comments about saving the environment while not going all in either. I should have an option to get an Apple watch without a band if they really cared about the environment. They don't. If they cared about the environment, they'd also talk about all the features we are getting with the new OS on older phones, and give more options for trade ins on phones. My 13 Pro Max shouldn't be worthless to them if there is a scratch on the screen, but that's what Apples trade in page says.
Whats occurred here is an attempt to explain away a financial decision while not decreasing prices, and they've been caught using an inferior product. If they decreased the cost on a product which probably cost them tens of cents before, and now costs cents, people wouldn't be as annoyed.
Have you bought one of the new cases or bands? Let us know what you think of them in the comments.
Article Link: 'Categorically Terrible,' and Other Early Reactions to Apple's New FineWoven Accessories
At least Apple didn't skin them alive like they do us.I'm sure the dead animals would not agree
So animal skin that’s gonna get discarded anyway is bad but the millions of plastic cases (made using petroleum (oil) )are good? Cool. Got it. 🙄What a misstep this is.
I'm all for getting rid of leather. The problem is that Apple decided they needed something novel to fill that premium price point. They just clearly didn't spend enough R&D effort on what that material should be.
Makes me relieved I accidentally made the right choice over my 15 case. I only picked silicone because I preferred the shade of the Storm Blue case over the FineWoven Pacific Blue.
Squalid filth.What case do you have on your Car covering the logo?
Doubtful. Food is the original subscription based product, millions of tons of the stuff produced daily, whereas leather can last forever. Who would be ridiculous enough to harvest the skin and discard the meat?Wrong letter industry support meat industry, also there are dedicated leather production, so an entire life is taken for a cover or something crap.
Sorry, this is terrible. I hope that you return them. nobody should tolerate this. Hope you bought from apple and not amazonView attachment 2272679
Def not worth what they are charging and they indeed scratch easily. Going back.
💯. I’m happy with my new FineWoven MagSafe wallet.I'm sure the dead animals would not agree
You don't slap discarded meat skin on a product and call it leather. Tanning is a hideous process with all sorts of environmental cost.So animal skin that’s gonna get discarded anyway is bad but the millions of plastic cases (made using petroleum (oil) )are good? Cool. Got it. 🙄
It definitely has a layer of synthetic memory foam on the inside and outside under the fabric.What is the cover's micro twill made of? Is it a synthetic textile?
How much water is used to make microchips? Or the sensors for 3 camera sensors? I don't see them reducing that.Guys, I believe you’re not getting the real reason Apple has ditched leather products.
Yes, it is a fact that leather is a byproduct of the abuses getting killed for meat.
The most negative impact on environment are the huge amounts of water needed to make leather usable for the products we know in the leather tanning process.
We’re already going through harsh times where we see frequent water shortage in several areas of the globe, so it is not advisable to keep wasting water that is crucial for human survival.
On the other hand, yes, the alternative Apple is offering seems not to be the best one so far. But that’s part of the process.
And remember this is not a war between the meat eaters and the vegans. It’s a bit deeper than that, and it has to do simply with rationally managing a very important resource for human life.
Nail. Head.Removing leather (which could last multiple phones if they kept the same dimensions)
That’s one logo that has to be one of the worst of all time. I wouldn’t buy that car just because their logo is that ugly.Fair. I wouldn't want people to know I drive a Hyundai either.
I didn't get it for the 15 Pro. I'm hanging on to my 14 Pro. Last year Apple kept the case options available for the 13 but this year they took them all down immediately and they started to sell out quickly at every other retailer.They changed the footprint of the phone so it won’t fit….. can already confirm that.
Third party case makers are absolutely thrilled with apple dropping leather cases. More profit for the little guys.I didn't get it for the 15 Pro. I'm hanging on to my 14 Pro. Last year Apple kept the case options available for the 13 but this year they took them all down immediately and they started to sell out quickly at every other retailer.
I got mine on sale but it's really no great loss that Apple doesn't make leather cases anymore. Although they fit the best the leather quality was poor compared to the full grain options from third parties.