Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Is MS going to become a strong competitor to Apple?


  • Total voters
    181
  • Poll closed .

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
Someone didn't do a proper job with his homework ;) USB3.1 comes in two flavours called Gen 1 and Gen 2. Gen 1 is better known as USB3.0, Gen 2 is the "actual" USB3.1 with the 10Gbps bandwidth and being able to supply power up to 100W. The real question is...which USB3.1 do the manufacturers and OS makers (in this case Microsoft and Apple) support? I doubt that at the moment anyone supports USB3.1 Gen 2 simply due to the fact that it isn't freely available yet. USB3.1 Gen 1 is (quite obvious as this is just USB3.0 which has been supported for quite some time now).
 

762999

Cancelled
Nov 9, 2012
891
509
Someone didn't do a proper job with his homework ;) USB3.1 comes in two flavours called Gen 1 and Gen 2. Gen 1 is better known as USB3.0, Gen 2 is the "actual" USB3.1 with the 10Gbps bandwidth and being able to supply power up to 100W. The real question is...which USB3.1 do the manufacturers and OS makers (in this case Microsoft and Apple) support? I doubt that at the moment anyone supports USB3.1 Gen 2 simply due to the fact that it isn't freely available yet. USB3.1 Gen 1 is (quite obvious as this is just USB3.0 which has been supported for quite some time now).

you're not teaching me anything! Whatever the gen, Macbook is still officially sporting usb 3.1 (even if it's gen1)

someone tested a gen2 chipset on the mac and it was working.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads...-info-repository.1866301/page-2#post-21468389
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
you're not teaching me anything! Whatever the gen, Macbook is still officially sporting usb 3.1 (even if it's gen1)

someone tested a gen2 chipset on the mac and it was working.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads...-info-repository.1866301/page-2#post-21468389
Mate, I'm the guy to talk to on the Mac Pro section about 3.1 on a Mac. I am on that discussion telling everyone about the drivers. OSX only supports 5gbps speed at the moment and has an XHCI 1.0 driver. Windows 10 is the only operating system that has built in XHCI 1.1 driver for 10gbps speed. And I have such a card in my Mac Pro.
 

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
you're not teaching me anything! Whatever the gen, Macbook is still officially sporting usb 3.1 (even if it's gen1)
Someone considers himself very important I see and it is rather distasteful...I didn't reply to you at all, I replied to @SoyCapitanSoyCapitan since he was talking about USB 3.1 and it being 10Gbps (which only goes for Gen 2, not Gen 1). That's why my post is after his and before yours ;)
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
Too conclude the deal on USB 3.1:

Windows 10 supports it out of the box.

Windows 8.1 requires drivers from Asmedia.

OSX has no built in or third party drivers available and therefore any USB 3.1 (Gen 2) device works as a 3.0 device.

USB 3.1 Gen 1 should never have been called 3.1. It's a sham to call it that.
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
Here is the driver provided by Microsoft at the top of the USB tree.
 

Attachments

  • image.jpeg
    image.jpeg
    1.9 MB · Views: 165

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
And to actually conclude it properly:

Windows 10 supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 (aka USB3.0) and Gen 2.
OS X El Capitan supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 (aka USB3.0) only.

Although I do agree that they shouldn't have turned USB3.1 into a Gen 1 and Gen 2 because it is confusing I also warn to use merely the term "USB 3.1" as this is even more confusing. It's called USB3.0/USB3.1 Gen 1 or USB3.1 Gen 2 and NOT USB3.1.

Thus the screenshot of the device manager says nothing since it only says "USB3.1" without telling which gen it is.
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
And to actually conclude it properly:

Windows 10 supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 (aka USB3.0) and Gen 2.
OS X El Capitan supports USB 3.1 Gen 1 (aka USB3.0) only.

Although I do agree that they shouldn't have turned USB3.1 into a Gen 1 and Gen 2 because it is confusing I also warn to use merely the term "USB 3.1" as this is even more confusing. It's called USB3.0/USB3.1 Gen 1 or USB3.1 Gen 2 and NOT USB3.1.

Thus the screenshot of the device manager says nothing since it only says "USB3.1" without telling which gen it is.

You made such an agreeable post and ruined it with the last sentence.

XHCI 1.1 is the 3.1 Gen 2 driver and my card is Asus USB dual port 3.1 Gen 2. Device Manager would not show a driver for a device that isn't installed.

This describes the revisions of the XHCI spec

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHCI#xHCI_1.1
 

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
Just saying that you are using the wrong screenshot to proof your point. Now if it said USB3.1 Gen 2...
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
Just saying that you are using the wrong screenshot to proof your point. Now if it said USB3.1 Gen 2...
I know this is the internet where people want to be right all the time but sometimes you really got to act like a real world person. XHCI 1.1 is USB 3.1 Gen 2 and if the Wikipedia article with links to Intel white papers, my hardware, my driver, my experience with my computer, and my screenshot aren't good enough evidence then nothing will work for you. It's called cognitive dissonance.
 

762999

Cancelled
Nov 9, 2012
891
509
Someone considers himself very important I see and it is rather distasteful...I didn't reply to you at all, I replied to @SoyCapitanSoyCapitan since he was talking about USB 3.1 and it being 10Gbps (which only goes for Gen 2, not Gen 1). That's why my post is after his and before yours ;)

sorry! :) my bad! :eek::rolleyes:
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
- Microsoft is not advertising that it can automatically detect all the peripherals on the market. Non-oem computers are coming with Windows and their drivers pre-installed. If you decide to re-install it yourself, it's expected at some point to install drivers. They support generic peripherals and that's it.

- Native support for USB 3.0 is not included due to delays in the finalization of the standard. So why expect do you expect them to support natively something that was not finished at the time?

My point is, there should be some way to provide standard USB drivers. At least make the USB 3 ports act like USB 2 or something.

What would I have to do if I had no DVD drive in the computer (which most are leaving out these days)? Forced to update to Windows 10 before I re-install?
 

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
I know this is the internet where people want to be right all the time but sometimes you really got to act like a real world person.
You seem to fit that description perfectly due to failing to understand what somebody is actually trying to say.

XHCI 1.1 is USB 3.1 Gen 2 and if the Wikipedia article with links to Intel white papers, my hardware, my driver, my experience with my computer, and my screenshot aren't good enough evidence then nothing will work for you. It's called cognitive dissonance.
The problem is that your screenshot doesn't add anything or proof anything. It doesn't say which generation USB3.1 is supported. The only thing it says is ASMedia and version 1.10. You have to be in the know to understand that currently only ASMedia has USB3.1 chips that support both Gen 1 and Gen 2. And you have to guess that version 1.10 means 1.1 (1.10 is higher than 1.1, it's what comes after 1.9) AND that this is the version number of the XHCI version instead of the actual driver/hardware itself.

You are so desperately trying to convince people that you are using evidence that isn't very sound. Now you can either keep insulting people like you are doing now or you can follow the advice that is given and next time actually use a screenshot that says more than the one you've used here. Also understand that one should not use generic terms like USB3.1 but specify them especially since Apple has the MacBook that comes with a USB3.1 Gen 1 port that uses the USB Type-C connector. Blame the USB-IF for creating all this mess since they named it, just don't add more confusion.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
You seem to fit that description perfectly due to failing to understand what somebody is actually trying to say.


The problem is that your screenshot doesn't add anything or proof anything. It doesn't say which generation USB3.1 is supported. The only thing it says is ASMedia and version 1.10. You have to be in the know to understand that currently only ASMedia has USB3.1 chips that support both Gen 1 and Gen 2. And you have to guess that version 1.10 means 1.1 (1.10 is higher than 1.1, it's what comes after 1.9) AND that this is the version number of the XHCI version instead of the actual driver/hardware itself.

You are so desperately trying to convince people that you are using evidence that isn't very sound. Now you can either keep insulting people like you are doing now or you can follow the advice that is given and next time actually use a screenshot that says more than the one you've used here. Also understand that one should not use generic terms like USB3.1 but specify them especially since Apple has the MacBook that comes with a USB3.1 Gen 1 port that uses the USB Type-C connector. Blame the USB-IF for creating all this mess since they named it, just don't add more confusion.

How are people adding more to the confusion? I am confused already. I thought there was just USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 and that was it.
 

dyn

macrumors 68030
Aug 8, 2009
2,708
388
.nl
The problem is that there are 2 kinds of USB3.1:
  • Gen 1: this is just USB3.0
  • Gen 2: the actual USB3.1 with the 10Gbps of bandwidth
So which one does someone mean when they talk about "USB3.1" ?
 

hojx

macrumors 6502
Jan 18, 2014
275
144
Singapore
How are people adding more to the confusion? I am confused already. I thought there was just USB 3.0 and USB 3.1 and that was it.

I'm understanding it as:
  1. USB 3.0 = USB3.1 Gen 1 (5Gbps)
  2. USB3.1 Gen 2 (10GBps)
Type-C refers to the shape of the port itself.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
8,142
7,120
I'm understanding it as:
  1. USB 3.0 = USB3.1 Gen 1 (5Gbps)
  2. USB3.1 Gen 2 (10GBps)
Type-C refers to the shape of the port itself.

Right, so why not just say USB 3.0 and USB 3.1?

The type of connectors doesn't really matter. There is Type A, Type B, Mini A, Mini B, Micro A and Micro B already :)
 
Jul 4, 2015
4,487
2,551
Paris
If tech journalists saw his discussion and how some people were refusing to acknowledge the Windows XHCI 1.1 compliant driver and my USB 3.1 hardware were all present and functional in my system it would be the most hilarious thing on the Internet for a week. PC enthusiasts would be laughing at Mac users all day and night.
 
Last edited:

762999

Cancelled
Nov 9, 2012
891
509
My point is, there should be some way to provide standard USB drivers. At least make the USB 3 ports act like USB 2 or something.

What would I have to do if I had no DVD drive in the computer (which most are leaving out these days)? Forced to update to Windows 10 before I re-install?

I understand your point. Personally, all my motherboards have 2x USB2 ports in the back, the others are usb3. It's also possible to inject drivers into the image (before installing).
 

azpc

macrumors 6502
Feb 24, 2011
295
229
I spent the last two evenings working with Windows 10. Wow! What an improvement.

Apple better start paying more attention to OSX.

Windows 10 in many ways has surpassed OSX (Lion - Yosemite) in ease of use, reliability and speed. Right now it is ahead of El Capitan in these same areas.

With 200 billion in the bank and with Macs being Apple's second best selling product, there is no excuse for Apple ignoring the Mac.

Windows 10 is amazingly fast. My Mom's old Toshiba laptop with an i3 processor completes tasks with the same programs faster than my 27 inch i7 iMac. This should not be!

What should Apple do? Focus on Speed, Reliability, Ease of Use. I know El Capitan is making progress towards these areas and that is good. However, Microsoft is gaining fast and may have actually passed Apple.

Microsoft definitely has an edge in customization. Unlike Apple's Stickers campaign, Windows 10 allows you to customize the operating system, not patch your Mac with a sticker.

Come on Apple don't let Microsoft beat you!


I posted a few ideas for improvement here:

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/what-new-features-would-you-like-to-see.1903102/
 

azpc

macrumors 6502
Feb 24, 2011
295
229
I installed Windows 10 in Bootcamp on my MBP. It's extremely fast, no lags whatsoever (unlike Yosemite), the Edge browser opens instantaneously. I had no hardware issues, everything worked well using the old Bootcamp drivers. It has some things which are clearly inspired by OS X (e.g. the new system settings panel = System Preferences; the Task View = Mission Control; the new notification center). It is designed to work on both laptops and tablets with the interface adapting to each device, something I wish Apple did with OS X. It's a good operating system and to be honest it makes OS X look a little bit dated.


Agreed! What an Amazing improvement. Apple better spend some of that $200 billion and assign more engineers to OSX.

The Mac is Apple's second most profitable product. It is almost unbelievable how Apple ignores it.
 

762999

Cancelled
Nov 9, 2012
891
509
Yesterday I tried the XBox app (Windows 10). When I entered my xbox account it automatically converted my Windows login account from local to MSN. I rebooted my pc and found out that I couldn't login with the old account and I had to use my MSN passport. I found a way to revert back but every features bundled in the OS is about controlling and getting all your information.

For me the other unwanted feature is that by default, it joins your machine to a p2p network to share patches and updates with other windows owner publicly on the Internet. You can disable it but by default it consumes bandwidth without people knowing.

I still think it's a great achievement for Windows, but it only make me enjoy the Mac more!
 

azpc

macrumors 6502
Feb 24, 2011
295
229
I'm curious, what are those tasks you're talking about? and in what ways you're 27 is slowing you down?

Shutdown, startup, LibreOffice, Firefox, Picasa etc.

My 27 inch iMac is no slouch, however, Lion-Yosemite is no match to Windows 10 when it comes to speed. Hopefully, El Capitan fixes this speed deficit.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.