Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Well, as I said and in previous posts, just because one “wants” something based on one’s lack of knowledge as to how use the OS provided doesn’t mean those wants supersede the majority of people who think or use their machines otherwise. I know that none of the gripes people are trying to address won’t appear in future iOS versions because (1) they’ve been tested, and (2) it doesn’t make sense.

Yeah, we heard your snarky comments then, as well as now. Knowledge of the OS has nothing to do with the ergonomic nightmare that is using an iPad on a keyboard and constantly having to reach up and touch the screen or having to use clunky keyboard sequences to select text and move around on the screen. And some of the things you "know" won't be future releases are already rumored to be included in iOS 13.
 
You’re right, less than 1% of people need those bulletin points. And I’m sure less than 1% of people in the market for an iPad will buy any of those things. (Actually 0% have full Photoshop right now, but that’s besides the point.) I contend that no one who doesn’t need a maxed iPad will spend that kind of money to get it. Even if I concede that 25% of maxed-Pro users care to have a mouse, that’s one-half of one-half of one percent.

So, no, Apple won’t add mouse support across every iOS device just for that small percentage. Same reason they won’t add touch support to a macOS device. So once more, you can use an iPad without a mouse/trackpad. You CAN’T use a macOS device without a mouse/trackpad. That’s my case to you.
I never stated I wanted mouse support across all iOS devices. Even today, we all deal with Apple differentiating between phone (no keyboard support) and tablets although both use iOS. You even have differing user experiences between the larger and smaller iPhones with regard to how certain apps work. So, while I may have a moral issue with Apple differentiating between the iPad and the iPad Pro by artificially restricting certain features for those able to afford an iPad Pro, business-wise, I can accept it.

And yes, I can and do use an iPad without mouse support. That was never in question. Just like I could and did use Macs when they were very limiting on how many displays that could be connect out of the box. For years, you could easily connect multiple monitors to even averagely spec'd PC, but not Macs. Yet, with TB-3 Apple did not ruin the Mac experience when they allowed us three or more monitors. The same with mouse support.

As to your first point about how few users need mouse support on their iPad Pro. Back in 2001, I switched to Macs with OS X for one main reason: Unix and the terminal. Getting Unix on a personal computer prior to this was a pain in the butt and Linux was in it's infancy. I would confidently say that maybe 1 in 1000 customers of Macs with OS X cared (or even knew) about Unix or having a terminal. Yet, Apple provided tools for those of us that did want or need it. It was such a geeky/nerdy use case. And regardless of any moaning I may have about Apple, I'll always deeply appreciate that.

Hopefully, what I experienced in 2001 with my iBook G3 is repeated in 2019. That iBook didn't replace my PC, but it moved it from a primary to a secondary position.

Edited: to remove excess words
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jinnyman
Same naysayer comments about stylus use before Apple announced the pencil. Go back and read. Same comments almost verbatim. “You’re in the minority”, “iOS is designed only for fingers”, “it doesn’t make sense” blah blah blah.
 
I have read all 20 plus posts you have made in this thread: You never explain how adding
pointer/mouse capability to the ipad would deminish your user experience, except some
vague assertion that it will cause a blurring of macOs and ios. So I ask again, make your
specific point.

To be fair the more an ipad can do, and closer to computer-esque function, the more people will want to use them as computer replacements; considering they are nearly or more powerful than brand new laptops already.

Would Apple rather sell you a $1800-2500/3000 13" Macbook or a $999 iPad? I think we all know that answer. They are all about that ASP now.

So while pointer support on iOS likely isnt hard at all to incorporate, and TV OS is something sort of similar, the better answer is Apple is unlikely to do so.
 
I just replied. Your reply indicates you won’t don’t want to bother to absorb my other posts because they won’t fit your agenda, and you’d rather ask me to repeat myself, to which you won’t agree either.
I asked you twice how adding mouse/trackpad would diminish or change the ipad experience.
I am reproducing your posts below to show none have dealt with this issue
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

#21
Oh, gee, lookee... yet ANOTHER The iPad Isn’t a Real Computer™ until it has mouse support/a real file system/makes my coffee thread.
#24
I can’t use touchscreen on a Macbook, so under this logic it has limited usefulness as well.
#28
This.
#58
The iPad Needs to be Just Like a Laptop tomfoolery keeps on going and going...
#80
Why don’t you, then, define what you think an iPad’s purpose is instead of snarking at the post and asking the OP to explain himself to YOU.
And it’s ludicrous to even silently suggest that the OP was arguing the merit of a mouse. Of COURSE it is a “superior form of input” and has been for about 40 years—but only so FOR THE DEVICE OF WHICH A MOUSE IS INTENDED. An iPad doesn’t need a mouse because an iPad already has a GUI that is built for touch and stylus, therefore a mouse is not detrimental to an iPad’s functionality.
#92
O. M. G.
MODS: Can we combine this thread here as well?
#96
Hmmm... less than 1% of the world uses Photoshop on their Macs, less than 0.1% of the world uses Final Cut Pro and/or XCode, and another 0.001% uses Terminal for command-line prompts. If those 1.11% of the world find that so important, get a dedicated device for those purposes. For the other 98.89% of the world, the iPad works just frickin’ fine. So if that qualifies the iPad a “paperweight,” bring on the gale. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Apparently you have no idea what an iPad’s purpose is or else you would’ve explained that instead of spending your time with this pointless drivel. No offense taken, dude.
And this argument just keeps going, and going, and going... “the iPad should serve the miniscule needs to serve the billions...” LOL!!!
#92
Apparently you have no idea what an iPad’s purpose is or else you would’ve explained that instead of spending your time with this pointless drivel. No offense taken, dude.
And this argument just keeps going, and going, and going... “the iPad should serve the miniscule needs to serve the billions...” LOL!!!
#209
The fact that you wrote this shows me that you have no idea how to use an iPad or have never used one at all. You can already use a hardware keyboard with an iPad. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
#213
You are in such a small minority, fortunately, and that’s the way it is and the way it will be. You’re missing the forest for the trees—or, in this case, a tiny sapling.
Exactly! +1
#227
IPad has had cursor selection for text selection since copy/paste was introduced. The fact that Apple included the capability to move a cursor to navigate around text in a virtual keyboard doesn’t go against “touch only” because you can only do so on screen, nor is that the argument people are making. People are suggesting that the addition of a physical piece of hardware, such as a mouse, is anything from a “nice add” to “absolutely critical.”
#229
I completely get where you’re going, but the keyboard and pencil are not *necessary* pieces of hardware, just “nice to haves” if one wants them. It’s not critical for someone traveling, for instance, to bring these peripherals to use every function on the iPad.
However, if a mouse is integrated, some apps can then become necessary just like macOS apps.CIf Apple felt that they should approve iOS apps for mouse support, why not just slap macOS on a tablet and be done with it. A mouse is essential to macOS software vs. a “nice to have” on iOS, as some here argue. A physical keyboard on macOS is an essential; not so on iOS.
I tried once to put OS10.X on a Mac Mini with a Planar touchscreen, and all I can tell you is that macOS with touch SUCKS, so selling contradicting hardware would drive Apple’s marketing department @_@.
#231
So, macOS on a single pane of glass. No, not necessary to be a “laptop replacement.” This would only be a laptop “replacement” in your current mode of thought.
#236
Yes. “When” you need something isn’t the same as “as” you need it. Thus, the point of an iPad vs. a macOS device. This is the essence of the “iPad Isn’t a Laptop Replacemnt” debate.
#238
I suspect the thread will keep going, because Apple will never do that!!!
At least I hope not!!
EDIT: I think Apple WILL release apps on macOS that don’t require mouse input on macOS. Then, the blurring of OS’s occurs. But it won’t be because iOS requires macOS input at all costs, but vice-versa.
#304
Agreed! I suggested that about 200 posts ago to no avail.
#314
Apple never said that touchscreen “[doesn’t[ belong on laptops.” I specifically remember an interview from years past in which Ive and team tested the feasibility of touch screens on macOS devices, and found the experience with macOS isn’t practical. I can attest to this as I’ve tried it myself.
In that vein, I would bet the farm that Apple tested mouse support for iOS and found it to not be a great user experience for iOS devices.
Also worth a read to rebut your assertion:
So, no, Apple isn’t “wrong” and I disagree with you because the premise of your response is inaccurate.
#314
A Touch Bar vs. adding touch to a laptop screen is an apples to oranges comparison to the point of this thread. (Even in that regard, I wouldn’t classify that as a “compromise” either).
There have been plenty of arguments against adding a mouse, in this thread and elsewhere that are perfectly logical and proper for the purpose of iOS. If you can’t see that, we’ll just have to agree to disagree.
#327
It wouldn’t change a thing for 99% of iPad users, so this won’t happen.
#331
I’ve already made the case throughout this thread.
#335
You’re right, less than 1% of people need those bulletin points. And I’m sure less than 1% of people in the market for an iPad will buy any of those things. (Actually 0% have full Photoshop right now, but that’s besides the point.) I contend that no one who doesn’t need a maxed iPad will spend that kind of money to get it. Even if I concede that 25% of maxed-Pro users care to have a mouse, that’s one-half of one-half of one percent.
So, no, Apple won’t add mouse support across every iOS device just for that small percentage. Same reason they won’t add touch support to a macOS device. So once more, you can use an iPad without a mouse/trackpad. You CAN’T use a macOS device without a mouse/trackpad. That’s my case to you.
#337
I just replied. Your reply indicates you won’t don’t want to bother to absorb my other posts because they won’t fit your agenda, and you’d rather ask me to repeat myself, to which you won’t agree either.
If you need more clarification, I can’t help you.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[doublepost=1542513436][/doublepost]
So while pointer support on iOS likely isnt hard at all to incorporate, and TV OS is something sort of similar, the better answer is Apple is unlikely to do so.
But that's not the question: my question is how would trackpad and mouse support diminish
the ipad experience?
[doublepost=1542513550][/doublepost]
Same naysayer comments about stylus use before Apple announced the pencil. Go back and read. Same comments almost verbatim. “You’re in the minority”, “iOS is designed only for fingers”, “it doesn’t make sense” blah blah blah.
Also, Steve never wanted it!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: ericwn
Yeah, we heard your snarky comments then, as well as now. Knowledge of the OS has nothing to do with the ergonomic nightmare that is using an iPad on a keyboard and constantly having to reach up and touch the screen or having to use clunky keyboard sequences to select text and move around on the screen. And some of the things you "know" won't be future releases are already rumored to be included in iOS 13.

I “know” that what features you say are “rumored” are made up by a small minority who just want a macOS experience on a single slab of glass. If you find that to be “snarky,” not my problem. ☉_☉
[doublepost=1542513850][/doublepost]
I never stated I wanted mouse support across all iOS devices. Even today, we all deal with Apple differentiating between phone (no keyboard support) and tablets although both use iOS. You even have differing user experiences between the larger and smaller iPhones with regard to how certain apps work. So, while I may have a moral issue with Apple differentiating between the iPad and the iPad Pro by artificially restricting certain features for those able to afford an iPad Pro, business-wise, I can accept it.

And yes, I can and do use an iPad without mouse support. That was never in question. Just like I could and did use Macs when they were very limiting on how many displays that could be connect out of the box. For years, you could easily connect multiple monitors to even averagely spec'd PC, but not Macs. Yet, with TB-3 Apple did not ruin the Mac experience when they allowed us three or more monitors. The same with mouse support.

As to your first point about how few users need mouse support on their iPad Pro. Back in 2001, I switched to Macs with OS X for one main reason: Unix and the terminal. Getting Unix on a personal computer prior to this was a pain in the butt and Linux was in it's infancy. I would confidently say that maybe 1 in 1000 customers of Macs with OS X cared (or even knew) about Unix or having a terminal. Yet, Apple provided tools for those of us that did want or need it. It was such a geeky/nerdy use case. And regardless of any moaning I may have about Apple, I'll always deeply appreciate that.

Hopefully, what I experienced in 2001 with my iBook G3 is repeated in 2019. That iBook didn't replace my PC, but it moved it from a primary to a secondary position.

Edited: to remove excess words

You were five paragraphs short of removing excessiveness.
 
Last edited:
But that's not the question: my question is how would trackpad and mouse support diminish the ipad experience?

It wont, never said it would. But not gonna waste time whacking semantics when Apple is unlikely to do it and cannibalize its MacBook sales; not anytime soon at least
 
  • Like
Reactions: RudySnow
I asked you twice how adding mouse/trackpad would diminish or change the ipad experience.
I am reproducing your posts below to show none have dealt with this issue
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

You don’t have to agree with me, and arguing with me over and over and over again doesn’t mean I’m less wrong than you are less right. Again, if you can’t find my arguments to be congruent with your opinion, I. CAN’T. HELP. YOU.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nugget
No, people are trying to make the tablet more useful, which is easily done with a few upgrades to iOS. This thread reminds me of these forums when the iPhone came out and didn't have cut and paste and all we heard about was reasons why it wasn't needed. Then Apple eventually released it and suddenly it was magical. I predict that many, if not all, of the things asked for will be in iOS in the next release or two.

Dude... you simply do not understand software design and engineering, and what happens with a lawnmower with wings.
[doublepost=1542518442][/doublepost]
iOS has matured and will continue to mature, getting more features some people want and need despite the vocal ones opposed to them...

What will never change is what it is. It’s a slab of aluminium and glass that you hold in your hand and touch interact with. It’s not a laptop, no matter how many things are glued onto it, and it will never be that.

OS X provides all of the power and point and click precision people want, WITH THE ADDITION OF HAVING ALL OF THE IOS MULTITOUCH.

Point and click will never happen in iOS and for good reason.

Eventually, I think the two operating systems should merge with responsive design so each App will know what device is being used and adjust its user interface for that device, as will the OS. A fluid OS and Apps that have one codebase.

I see the future of the Operating System being much more fluid and out of the way, accommodating many screen sizes as well as touch paradigms.

The Microsoft Surface Studio PC is incredible: like a future iMac. Apple cannot do this currently because of their operating system framework: no touch in OS X.

OS X would need a complete redesign and I would push for the responsive strategy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RudySnow
Dude... you simply do not understand software design and engineering, and what happens with a lawnmower with wings.
[doublepost=1542518442][/doublepost]

What will never change is what it is. It’s a slab of aluminium and glass that you hold in your hand and touch interact with. It’s not a laptop, no matter how many things are glued onto it, and it will never be that.

OS X provides all of the power and point and click precision people want, WITH THE ADDITION OF HAVING ALL OF THE IOS MULTITOUCH.

Point and click will never happen in iOS and for good reason.

Eventually, I think the two operating systems should merge with responsive design so each App will know what device is being used and adjust its user interface for that device, as will the OS. A fluid OS and Apps that have one codebase.

I see the future of the Operating System being much more fluid and out of the way, accommodating many screen sizes as well as touch paradigms.

The Microsoft Surface Studio PC is incredible: like a future iMac. Apple cannot do this currently because of their operating system framework: no touch in OS X.

OS X would need a complete redesign and I would push for the responsive strategy.

Never is a long, long time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Never mind
You were five paragraphs short of removing excessiveness.

Good one. Admittedly, I’m very passionate about iOS. I believe it’s my future computer platform. Sorry if you find my posts annoying, but like the upcoming mouse support for iPad Pro that I believe will arrive in 2019, you can just ignore them.
 
Cut and paste? I think this discussion is getting outside the scope of your skillset...

Or perhaps the discussion is testing the limits of your knowledge of Apple's product history.

On this very board, tons of posters told everyone here asking for cut and paste how we didn't need it and Apple would never add it to iOS. Then Apple added it and it was "magical". It was eerily like some of the things posted in this thread and I suspect the same will happen after some of the features mentioned are added.
 
Or perhaps the discussion is testing the limits of your knowledge of Apple's product history.

On this very board, tons of posters told everyone here asking for cut and paste how we didn't need it and Apple would never add it to iOS. Then Apple added it and it was "magical". It was eerily like some of the things posted in this thread and I suspect the same will happen after some of the features mentioned are added.

The iPad will magically have a 15” screen without being too awkward to hold. It’ll magically have a mouse arrow that will be used to interact with huge hit targets not designed for that purpose. It’ll macically hold itself up so your gorilla arms can be free to interact with it. It’ll magically read your mind so you don’t have to reach out your gorilla arms and touch the screen.
 
There is nothing about the iOS multi-touch UI that would prevent it from being perfectly compatible with a mouse. Nothing.

You are conflating two issues with the Surface comparison. Microsoft tried to tack a touch interface on top of a mouse based interface. Strike 1. Microsoft’s hardware choice for their touch pads is merely mediocre. Strike 2.

Apple has a history of doing better. The fact that Microsoft did a poor job of integrating these features really says nothing at all about how it would work at Apple.

I don’t expect my iPad to completely replace my laptop, but as an owner of nearly every iPad model since day 1, I have been having these exact same arguments since 2010. The iPad wasn’t ruined when it got a keyboard. It wasn’t ruined when it got a stylus. And it wasn’t ruined when it got multi-tasking. It’s clear as day that Apple is stringing users along a bit at a time as they develop iOS and add old tools to a new operating system. I expect Apple will eventually bring mouse support as well, the iPad once again won’t be ruined, and the critics will once again be silenced.

Very well said.
The lack of vision that some of the typical “good enough” folks who discuss here have is interesting. Apple Pencil all over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jinnyman
Again... just like the comments about a stylus before the Apple Pencil.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-will-apple-make-its-own-stylus.1670453/

“When will Apple makes its own stylus?”
“It's never going to happen so I suggest you just accept that. Apple has designed its tablets and phones with finger touch in mind and do not see a stylus as a viable input device. This is never going to change. Either you get use to it or switch to a brand that caters for your needs.”

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...ith-a-stylus-like-the-note-10-1-2014.1686720/

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-all-so-stingy-on-providing-a-stylus.1840688/

“Because most people don't want them”

Sound familiar?
 
Again... just like the comments about a stylus before the Apple Pencil.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-will-apple-make-its-own-stylus.1670453/

“When will Apple makes its own stylus?”
“It's never going to happen so I suggest you just accept that. Apple has designed its tablets and phones with finger touch in mind and do not see a stylus as a viable input device. This is never going to change. Either you get use to it or switch to a brand that caters for your needs.”

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...ith-a-stylus-like-the-note-10-1-2014.1686720/

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-all-so-stingy-on-providing-a-stylus.1840688/

“Because most people don't want them”

Sound familiar?
So because other people may have been wrong about a completely different issue in the past, anyone who ever disagrees with you in the future is wrong.

Got it.
 
So because other people may have been wrong about a completely different issue in the past, anyone who ever disagrees with you in the future is wrong.

Got it.

If that’s how you choose to interpret my post, fine. The similarities are striking. Same narrow minded thinking then and now.
 
Very well said.
The lack of vision that some of the typical “good enough” folks who discuss here have is interesting. Apple Pencil all over again.

Again... just like the comments about a stylus before the Apple Pencil.

https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/when-will-apple-make-its-own-stylus.1670453/

“When will Apple makes its own stylus?”
“It's never going to happen so I suggest you just accept that. Apple has designed its tablets and phones with finger touch in mind and do not see a stylus as a viable input device. This is never going to change. Either you get use to it or switch to a brand that caters for your needs.”

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...ith-a-stylus-like-the-note-10-1-2014.1686720/

https://forums.macrumors.com/thread...-all-so-stingy-on-providing-a-stylus.1840688/

“Because most people don't want them”

Sound familiar?

No.

I wasn’t part of any argument that Apple won’t create a stylus. I used a stylus with my original iPad for note taking and drawing. Apple saw those tasks as a compelling need and created a better class of stylus, thus the Apple Pencil. That was a new invention based on an existing technology from third parties.

Apple has been selling mice for, what, 40 years now? Don’t you pro-Mickey Mouse people honestly believe that if Apple saw a compelling need to add mouse support to an iPad they would’ve done so already? A stylus is a touch-input device, but a mouse isn’t. If a mouse is so necessary for input on iOS, then conversely why wouldn’t Apple add Apple Pencil support to macOS?

The real “lack of vision” is from those of you who, as a previous poster put it, advocate “adding wings to a lawnmower.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: booksbooks
If that’s how you wish to interpret my post, fine. The similarities are striking. Same narrow minded thinking then and now.
You continuously ignore the valid concerns that have been stated in this thread, and instead keep referring to the stylus instead of addressing the concerns. Mouse support is a completely different issue, and to me failing to recognize that seems a bit narrow minded in all honesty.
[doublepost=1542556231][/doublepost]
I think the argument goes something like this: If Apple adds optional support for the mouse, then the App Store is going to become polluted with a non-zero number of applications that de facto require a mouse due to lazy developers making terrible ports of desktop apps without truly confronting the different usage style that a tablet brings. This will, over time, end up with a situation where you pretty much have to have a mouse lying around for your iPad for those apps where the developers avoided spending the time and resources embracing the touch/tablet interface.

The world of iPad ownership then becomes a frustrating exercise of monitoring app reviews and comments to learn if any particular app can be used successfully without a mouse. Sometimes you're going to download an app and then discover that it can't really be used effectively without that "optional" mouse
.

As someone who designs website using Bootstrap, I design a responsive website with a single user interface that works with both Touch on mobile and Mouse on desktop. I have to make compromises to the design, layout, and functionality of the site so that it works well in both instances.

I see many web devs who don't put thought and effort into it, and can easily see this being a problem for apps on iOS.

If Touch were to become a less than optimal experience is many apps, it will cause more harm to iOS than any perceived benefit.

Adding optional mouse support will also add to the complexity of iOS. One of the reasons for the success of the iPad is because of its simplicity. In addition to the price, that's arguably one of the reasons Apple sells twice as many iPads as it does Macs. In 2017 Apple sold 43.8 million iPads and 19.6 million Macs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: RudySnow
You continuously ignore the valid concerns that have been stated in this thread, and instead keep referring to the stylus instead of addressing the concerns. Mouse support is a completely different issue, and to me failing to recognize that seems a bit narrow minded in all honesty.

And as I’ve stated, I personally don’t see any valid concerns here, including the ones you’ve raised. Mouse support would in no way negatively affect the iPad, iOS, or users. It would be completely optional to use.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree. And when Apple introduces mouse support, we’ll resurrect this thread and have a party.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.