I quit running Windows via Boot Camp years ago. I got tired of the fans running at 110% the moment my mac loaded the Windows desktop. When I need to run Windows on my Macs, I do so via Parallels or VMWare now.
I have been a Mac user since 1990 with the acquisition of an LC II. Well before Apple switched to using Intel processors. Based on this I can say that the Macintoshes popularity was not what it has become due to the switch to Intel processors.You haven't been a Mac user for very long, or at least you've only followed them since Apple began creating Intel Macs which was back in 2006. Several years before that Macs have always enjoyed success in the arts as they do today and they didn't run Windows. Recording artists, DJ's and movie studios have used Macs exclusively and they were not capable of running Windows at the time.
Haha, that's hilarious!! Not gonna happen. Time has passed and it's commonplace to have a Mac running MacOS. No point in Apple making computers at all if the world can only live on Windows, because I hope you understand that's exactly what you're saying?
Like I said based on your post you're suggesting that we don't need anything but Windows to run the world. You don't need a Mac if you have that type of mentality. Seriously.While time has passed and the Macintosh has gained in popularity it will be interesting to see if it can maintain that momentum without native Windows, along with the corresponding applications, support. Many Mac users need Windows support, especially in a business environment. Is this a guaranteed outcome? Certainly not, it's my opinion. An opinion formed through 31 years of Mac use.
Hold on Cowboy-gals, i thought the M1 was supporting windows- according to that "event" i witnessed Nov 17th. They even had a rosetta stone or parallels software and a brief 4 second video blurb on how marvelous windows works on the M1 MacBook.
Not that i will lose sleep over this, or even use windows on a mac, i just know what i seen.
What I am saying is a lot of Mac users need the ability to run Windows applications. As the Intel Macintoshes could natively run Windows in addition to macOS there was little risk in buying one. You got the best of both worlds. With the Apple Silicon (AS) Macs the ability to natively run Windows (and its associated applications) is in question. Therefore it may no longer be the safe choice it once was.Like I said based on your post you're suggesting that we don't need anything but Windows to run the world. You don't need a Mac if you have that type of mentality. Seriously.
I think the harsh reality is that those who need Windows apps are going to have to buy a Windows PC. That doesn't mean you have to give up your Mac, far from it. People seem to have an "all or nothing" attitude to these things sometimes. But many people who also ran Windows on their Mac in the past are going to have to get with the programme and run a separate PC as well.
While Windows on ARM has an ability to emulate x86/64 apps, it's a clunky approach that is a pain for professional use on a daily basis. Plus, those x86 apps won't be native which is no good for critical testing.
Apple decided to make this change, for the good of their customers or not. As Mac users, we have to just accept that this is the way it is now – Apple is now a fully proprietary platform and it's probably only a matter of time before even Mac programs can only be installed via an App Store.
I personally am extremely happy I am back on the macOS platform, and not forced to use windows at all, either for personal use or my job. windows temperament issues made having to work from home much much more difficult. at least when we were working in the office before this alleged pandemic crisis, when the windows computer gave me fits, I would get up and either go downstairs for a smoke break or one of the many Starbucks breaks for the day. being forced to work from home, and the nearest Starbucks is either a 5 minute drive or 20 minute walk, all I could do is walk away from the misbehaving windows laptop for 5 minutes for a smoke break and ended up smoking way too much triggering the asthma I do not take medication for or have followed up on by having a physical examination, and since Wednesday January 6 of this year, when I got my 2015 MacBook Air, and using it for my job, I am actually able to tolerate working from home alone, and actually get work done, and only use my vape instead of smoking cigarettes to trigger the asthma.If you miss running Windows then you're buying the wrong computer. Macs should be running only MacOS. That's what they are designed for. Bootcamp back in the day was when Apple needed to get Macs into more people's hands. Today it's commonplace to own a Mac and Apple no longer needs to cater to the small demographic that wants to run Windows. There are plenty of Windows machines on the market with many choice configurations. I do not understand this argument because if anyone misses running Windows on their Mac then they weren't using MacOS very much in the first place.
Right! Not sure why you regurgitated what I already said about your previous post. In your thinking the world doesn't need Macs but rather only needs Windows. You don't need a Mac according to your thinking. Not sure why you'd even consider one with your way of thinking. You only need a Windows PC. I've been a Mac user for almost 30 years and I work in a corporate environment. Not once have I needed to use Windows on my Mac, so don't say A LOT OF MAC USERS unless you have concrete proof of this.What I am saying is a lot of Mac users need the ability to run Windows applications.
OK, here you go:Right! Not sure why you regurgitated what I already said about your previous post. In your thinking the world doesn't need Macs but rather only needs Windows. You don't need a Mac according to your thinking. Not sure why you'd even consider one with your way of thinking. You only need a Windows PC. I've been a Mac user for almost 30 years and I work in a corporate environment. Not once have I needed to use Windows on my Mac, so don't say A LOT OF MAC USERS unless you have concrete proof of this.
But you are using your subjective experience as proof?Right! Not sure why you regurgitated what I already said about your previous post. In your thinking the world doesn't need Macs but rather only needs Windows. You don't need a Mac according to your thinking. Not sure why you'd even consider one with your way of thinking. You only need a Windows PC. I've been a Mac user for almost 30 years and I work in a corporate environment. Not once have I needed to use Windows on my Mac, so don't say A LOT OF MAC USERS unless you have concrete proof of this.
Uh isn't this thread about running Bootcamp? Yeah, thanks....LMAO gives me a link to the Parallels website. ?OK, here you go:
Parallels: Mac & Windows Virtualization, Remote Application Server, Mac Management Solutions
"Over 7 Million Users and Praised by Experts"
That's just one solution to running Windows on a Mac. You may not need it but a lot of people do.
Maybe if you took the time and read my other posts I'm not here to try and prove anything as some others here are trying to prove that the world needs Macs running Windows. I've stated (and stand by it) that Apple does not create Macs to run Windows as the primary OS. That's why they create their own OS. Some people arguing over and over just have to deal with it that Apple is moving on and if Microsoft decides it's okay to install Windows and Apple wants to continue supporting Bootcamp then so be it, but people running Windows on Macs is a much smaller demographic than others here care to admit. Furthermore I'd rather see Apple putting forth more resources into MacOS and their computers rather than wasting time on a niche crowd of Windows users.But you are using your subjective experience as proof?
The subject of this thread is irrelevant. I said:Uh isn't this thread about running Bootcamp? Yeah, thanks....LMAO gives me a link to the Parallels website. ?
That ?? is ?? not ??trueBoot Camp is dead for all intents and purposes, as Apple has made it clear that virtualization is the path going forward.
i was never good at typing exact date, and remembering i was never good at typing exact dates.What event was on Nov 17th?
The M1 launch event was Nov 10th. Video is here: Apple Events - November 2020 - Apple
I purchased a Dell XPS for work in 2019 due to the windows environment.Not at all personally
BUT
I use my 2016 no Touch Bar 13" MBP for Windows 10.
Never wanted it on another machine even when I had the early 2020 i5 Air
Not going to pretend my use case is everyone's (that they have two machines, one already with Windows, etc)
A very sound post. Too bad some others here don't get it.Boot Camp is dead for all intents and purposes, as Apple has made it clear that virtualization is the path going forward. What we have seen based on multiple reports and reviews is that running Windows on Arm (WoA) via either the Parallels preview or QEMU is actually faster than running WoA natively on the Surface Pro X. This indicates that Boot Camp is not needed at all for those users wanting to run Windows applications on an M1 Mac. The roadblock preventing wider adoption of WoA is Microsoft - specifically its licensing restrictions for WoA (which limits its availability to OEMs building ARM-based systems specifically to run Windows). Apple has openly stated that the M1 and Big Sur can handle WoA without any issue, but that actual implementation is "up to Microsoft."
The other thing is that Microsoft is in the process of updating WoA to better handle both 32 and 64-bit applications, which will alleviate many of the frustrations people have with the OS currently. If Microsoft changes the licensing and opens up WoA to end users, that change coupled with the internal changes to address 32/64-bit interoperability could alleviate the few remaining obstacles for the small number of Boot Camp users to make the switch to Apple Silicon.