The expandable store in the note 8 is irrelevant,the price is within spitting distance of the iPhone x edition. Since you don't know if the price is accurate, you don't know if it's inaccurate.
My phones last 5 years without replacement, but optional to replace sooner so no issues purchasing them Outright.
That would be like saying the wireless charging, dual camera, water proofing, edge to edge screen, etc is irrelevant on the upcoming, high-end iPhone. You can just disregard a device's feature set because it doesn't fit your argument.
Go over to the iPad Pro forum on this website. There are countless threads asking if it is worth the MONEY to get more storage. It is $100 to upgrade from 64gb to 256gb. While this is way better compared to past storage tiers, it is still not cheap. If the iPad pro has expandable storage, it would greatly increase its utility.
I own the iPad pro 12.9, 2nd gen. I love it. If it had a microsd slot, I would love it more. The ability to cheaply and efficiently store large number of documents, pictures, and media files; without compromising on-device storage levels is a huge plus.
Picture and media files are the biggest storage consumers on modern day smartphones. I went on a 2 week vacation/road trip recently and took 1500 photos (literally) and several 4k videos on the galaxy s8+. I spent a good chunk of that in the middle of the rural, isolated upstate New York mountains. I didn't have signal, no one did. Wifi was also about as reliable as a pair of rabbit ears in the 70s. I really put my 128gb microsd card to use, and never once did I worry about running out of storage.
If I had the 64gb iPhone, I would have ran out of storage. I didn't even mention the movies and shows I put on microsd card, that my wife used, during the long drive times.
If I we to purchase the $1100 or $1200 iPhone x, or whatever it is called, maybe this wouldn't be a problem. But after take, we are look at nearly double the price of the iPhone 6 base model. That isn't a small amount of money for a phone. I don't care how much money one does or does not have. That is indeed irrelevant to the argument.
Every feature, from software to hardware matters when the price gets that high.
For me, the note 8 was a no brainer. I owned the note 7, before that disaster went down. I bought a used lg g4 off of amazon for $40 for the trade-in. Along with my small student discount, the Note 8 cost me less than $500. The base price may be $920, but you are not going to get the iphone x for that price.
All factors matter when phones get this expensive. You can argue the merits of said features until the end of time, but you can't disregard them.
[doublepost=1504038479][/doublepost]
That's a lie. Nobody needs to replace an iPhone every year, that is just selective preference. My iPhone 6S is as fast as the day it was released and pretty much matches the speed of an iPhone 7 in my personal experience. It's a nearly 2 year old design and in no way needs replacing. People who replace their devices annually do so because they like having the new phone and are happy to lose money in the pursuit of having that new phone.
True. Both iPhone and Androids do loose out, quickly, on features every year. That may be more of his point, but you are also correct. You can go multiple years with the same phone, if you choose to do so.
A custom built PC will stay relevant longer than a phone, due to the nature of the upgrades, and the ability to adjust program/game settings. The same applies to a MBP.