I have already succumbed. I can’t stand looking at that beauty. My 7 Plus is unusable on iOS 11 anyway. Might as well sell it and get the newest iPhone.Next week is going to be a test of my self control.
I have already succumbed. I can’t stand looking at that beauty. My 7 Plus is unusable on iOS 11 anyway. Might as well sell it and get the newest iPhone.Next week is going to be a test of my self control.
I will never switch to android. Ever. I'll stop using phones first.
Running beta on your main phone is never a good idea. You have to expect issues when downloading beta.It's a shame: my iPhone 6 is with iOS 11 (last beta) just too slow and the next iPhone is according to the leaks for me just ugly and too expensive!
I'm considering to try the S8. For now, I found Windows and the Surface a (good!) revelation after 10 years Mac and then iPads.
How bright is a LCD screen with always on display. I can have a pitch black picture taking up my entire iPhone screen, and it's still pretty bright in the dark. In fact in the dark that black picture has an awful contrast ratio because it is backlit. It's just my opinion, but always on display and LCD don't belong in the same sentence.
Yes they rate that particular display the best display on a device currently. I have never argued against the quality of Samsung's Super AMOLED screens.Except review sites like Displaymate are rating the AMOLED panels in the Samsung Note 8 as the best screen they have ever tested with Data to back it up. Even without full RGB the latest Samsung Panels are besting other displays in all areas. Its really the end of the argument as far as i'm concerned.
Mate, you should know that even if it was the running perfectly, some posters would still trollRunning beta on your main phone is never a good idea. You have to expect issues when downloading beta.
True, just like people say a phone lags when it doesn'tMate, you should know that even if it was the running perfectly, some posters would still troll.....
Yes they rate that particular display the best display on a device currently.
But importantly and what people are constantly failing to understand or grasp is that doesn't make a blanket statement that AMOLED is automatically better than LCD true.
The constant assertion is simply fallacious. But trying to discuss this with folks armed with a half understanding of the technology, but a fixed opinion regardless, is pointless.
I'm happy you have made up your mind. But your mind does not make something universally true or fact. Period.
I don’t get it. We are just 6 days away from GM. The iPhone 8 already has a prior version of iOS 11 already installed on it. The GM is not going to magically run better in all instances than the beta in just 6 days.Running beta on your main phone is never a good idea. You have to expect issues when downloading beta.
Well in theory it should improve through each beta and while it's near the end it is still a beta. Even when the public release is out there can be issues after all. Sometimes it takes an update or two after to be flawless for some people.I don’t get it. We are just 6 days away from GM. The iPhone 8 already has a prior version of iOS 11 already installed on it. The GM is not going to magically run better in all instances than the beta.
I don’t get it. We are just 6 days away from GM. The iPhone 8 already has a prior version of iOS 11 already installed on it. The GM is not going to magically run better in all instances than the beta in just 6 days.
This home button delay is inexcusable and I can tell it’s not going to be fixed in the GM as well as people have been complaining about it since Beta 1 and it was never fixed.
Well in theory it should improve through each beta and while it's near the end it is still a beta. Even when the public release is out there can be issues after all. Sometimes it takes an update or two after to be flawless for some people.
That's my point entirely. I never argued that the best of AMOLED (currently as we know Note 8) isn't the best, merely the assumption about an OLED screen being automatically better was false.I totally agree with the fact that not all OLED panels are equal, the POLED panel in the new LG V30 is shocking in terms of uniformity. However If you put the best OLED panel available (Note 8) up against the best LCD panel (iPhone 7) the Note 8 wins in almost every measurable way. Then you have TVs which are another kettle of fish altogether, the input lag on the current LG OLEDs is still rubbish and the reason ive not moved to an OLED TV yet.
That's my point entirely. I never argued that the best of AMOLED (currently as we know Note 8) isn't the best, merely the automatic assumption about OLED being better was false.
Outside of Samsung's Flagship Galaxy and Note devices of the last couple of years the quality of AMOLED drops considerably, if you think the V30 is bad then the Moto Z Force 2 will leave you traumatised. Even Samsung's panels used in other devices are no way near as good quality such as the Pixels, which have good screens but not great ones with all the flaws of the technology evident (uniformity, outdoor visibility, colour tint when adjusting brightness levels, reports of burn-in etc).
But despite that we get folks here who will just declare OLED superior without actually understanding why outside of a small handful of devices with great AMOLED screens the story of OLED tells quite a different tale.
I'm not saying OLED isn't the future, merely that it can not be DEFINITIVELY asserted as the best until we stop getting panels which aren't as good as excellent LCD counterparts.
By the way Super AMOLED from Samsung is the closest we have currently to a full RGB panel and I do not doubt when they have solved the manufacturing issues they are having going full RGB sub pixel panel, we will first see them in Galaxy or Note devices.
But currently the picture is a messy one and one
with so many variables that to make definitive assertions or at least lazy assertions over tech here in the forum is misleading and false. I am talking about folks in general here not anyone in particular.
Yes in a number of ways. Outdoor visibility on the pixel is poor. Pixel has max Nit of 520 whereas the iPhone 7 plus goes up to 700 Nits. That's a massive difference.The panel on the Pixel is inferior to the 7 Plus LCD?
Agree 100 percent. Like everyone I just want a display with great blacks, good colour accuracy, low input lag, and good motion handling. Im a fan of any display that can provide me with those attributes. I also think MicroLED is the true future and I'm looking forward to that tech being available. I think my dislike of LCD in general stems from TV's, even the best LCD tv's have terrible uniformity in the blacks which really spoils the experience when watching a movie, in particular dark scenes.That's my point entirely. I never argued that the best of AMOLED (currently as we know Note 8) isn't the best, merely the assumption about an OLED screen being automatically better was false.
Outside of Samsung's Flagship Galaxy and Note devices of the last couple of years the quality of AMOLED drops considerably, if you think the V30 is bad then the Moto Z Force 2 will leave you traumatised. Even Samsung's panels used in other devices are no way near as good quality such as the Pixels, which have good screens but not great ones with all the flaws of the technology evident (uniformity, outdoor visibility, colour tint when adjusting brightness levels, reports of burn-in etc).
But despite that we get folks here who will just declare OLED superior without actually understanding why outside of a small handful of devices with great AMOLED screens the story of OLED tells quite a different tale.
I'm not saying OLED isn't the future, merely that it can not be DEFINITIVELY asserted as the best until we stop getting panels which aren't as good as excellent LCD counterparts.
By the way Super AMOLED from Samsung is the closest we have currently to a full RGB panel and I do not doubt when they have solved the manufacturing issues they are having going full RGB sub pixel panel, we will first see them in Galaxy or Note devices.
But currently the picture is a messy one and one
with so many variables that to make definitive assertions or at least lazy assertions over tech here in the forum is misleading and false. I am talking about folks in general here not anyone in particular.
Agree 100 percent. Like everyone I just want a display with great blacks, good colour accuracy, low input lag, and good motion handling. Im a fan of any display that can provide me with those attributes. I also think MicroLED is the true future and I'm looking forward to that tech being available. I think my dislike of LCD in general stems from TV's, even the best LCD tv's have terrible uniformity in the blacks which really spoils the experience when watching a movie, in particular in dark scenes.
That's not the point whether a flagship "can beat" another flagship. The point is choice, I care about the specs as much as form and function. But it's pretty much gonna be the a11 is going to be awesome.
Apple has no choice apart from Samsung for OLEDs according to reports and the LG OLED manufacturing is not going so well so they may exist as budget models.The best phone is the phone I want to buy. LCD will be here on select Apple models as the coffin will take years to be buried.
Apple isn't even getting enough OLEDs to meet demand till 2019. You can forget about anything other than OLED till 2022 at the very least as no display maker has enough resources apart from Samsung to be Apple's supplier. Heck Samsung is supposedly bossing Apple around with the OLED displays and we don't even know if they are the best.Sure you have been saying this for at least four years and look what finally happened.Oled will be around for less time Than LCD as better tech takes its place.
I am saying its slower than TouchID and it will be fooled by a photo or some other technique a few days after release. I don't need to read the white paper to know thisYour leaping to conclusions. My stance is you haven't read apples white paper on security so you can't comment. That's much different than claiming I said something I didn't.
Actually hardware wise Apple socs have been besting galaxy's for years; where it counts. And Tim gave android an heart attack in 2013 when 64 bit was introduced.
Well I am going back to iOS 10 and using my iPad for testing iOS 11 so if the sluggishness isn't fixed in GM, I will downgrade to iOS 10.3.3 permanently till I get my newer iPhoneThe GM is however officially supported by apple support. Beta is not.
You have no idea what will or won't be fixed in the GM.
All I'm saying is that apple offering choice is great for the consumer. I can stick with touchid (if they were even going to remove it in the first place) and lcd on the 7s+.I am just saying in each and every spec the iPhone 8 will be better. That's all I want and need
Seems apple has SOME choice and next year it will be an entirely different ballgame.Apple has no choice apart from Samsung for OLEDs according to reports and the LG OLED manufacturing is not going so well so they may exist as budget models.
If samsung screws with apple they will drop them like a hot potato; guaranteed.Apple isn't even getting enough OLEDs to meet demand till 2019. You can forget about anything other than OLED till 2022 at the very least as no display maker has enough resources apart from Samsung to be Apple's supplier. Heck Samsung is supposedly bossing Apple around with the OLED displays and we don't even know if they are the best.
No, but you what you need is a reveal or a leak the day before the reveal to know exactly what apples plans are.I am saying its slower than TouchID and it will be fooled by a photo or some other technique a few days after release. I don't need to read the white paper to know this
For me oled is the bottom reason I would ever upgrade my phone and whilst you place oled high on your list, I place the chipsets, which give the phone their character and function high on my list.Okay and what about displays?
That's my point entirely. I never argued that the best of AMOLED (currently as we know Note 8) isn't the best, merely the assumption about an OLED screen being automatically better was false.
Outside of Samsung's Flagship Galaxy and Note devices of the last couple of years the quality of AMOLED drops considerably, if you think the V30 is bad then the Moto Z Force 2 will leave you traumatised. Even Samsung's panels used in other devices are no way near as good quality such as the Pixels, which have good screens but not great ones with all the flaws of the technology evident (uniformity, outdoor visibility, colour tint when adjusting brightness levels, reports of burn-in etc).
But despite that we get folks here who will just declare OLED superior without actually understanding why outside of a small handful of devices with great AMOLED screens the story of OLED tells quite a different tale.
I'm not saying OLED isn't the future, merely that it can not be DEFINITIVELY asserted as the best until we stop getting panels which aren't as good as excellent LCD counterparts.
By the way Super AMOLED from Samsung is the closest we have currently to a full RGB panel and I do not doubt when they have solved the manufacturing issues they are having going full RGB sub pixel panel, we will first see them in Galaxy or Note devices.
But currently the picture is a messy one and one
with so many variables that to make definitive assertions or at least lazy assertions over tech here in the forum is misleading and false. I am talking about folks in general here not anyone in particular.
7 Plus are reporting bugs to Apple in the feedback app