Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
grabberslasher said:
Sorry about the funny angles on the first one - I did a photomerge in PS and it had to compensate for the different perspectives. These are my main machines, aside from my MacBook Pro, but it doesn't have a desk to itself so I won't post a pic. Every single main machine is Intel based by now for me, except my web server.
Is that a Developmental Intel PowerMac?
 
Benjamindaines said:
What chip does it run?

I believe such information is still covered by NDA, but there's plenty of information on the net about the DTK. The one Steve showed at WWDC was a 3.6GHz Pentium 4 EMT64 machine.
 
grabberslasher said:
Sorry about the funny angles on the first one - I did a photomerge in PS and it had to compensate for the different perspectives. These are my main machines, aside from my MacBook Pro, but it doesn't have a desk to itself so I won't post a pic. Every single main machine is Intel based by now for me, except my web server.


Thats a nice case? Care to show us a few more pics?(front and side, back)

And why did apple put a P4 sticker on it??!!?!?
 
grabberslasher said:
I believe such information is still covered by NDA, but there's plenty of information on the net about the DTK. The one Steve showed at WWDC was a 3.6GHz Pentium 4 EMT64 machine.

I thought they already pulled most of these back in?
 
iGary said:
I thought they already pulled most of these back in?

The original license states that it has to be back December 06, the reason most developers have returned them already is that 10.4.3 was the last version of OS X to run on them and as Apple provide an iMac in exchange there is no actual need for the DTK any more. Although I have already "exchanged" it for an iMac, I still don't have to return the DTK before December.
 
I'm 16 and for about 5 yearsi had a

1. 15.4" G4 iMac, 700MHz, 256RAM, 100MHz Bus Speed, 40GB HDD, 32MB VRAM, with the little round speakers and an iSub.

I have recently (a month ago. i know, the new processors are coming out, but its ok. too late now) bought a

2. 20" Intel iMac, 2GHz, 1GB RAM, 250GB HDD, 667MHZ Bus Speed, 128MB VRAM, with mighty mouse and and HP C180 All-in-One printer.

3. I have also bought an aiirport Extreme Base Station to connect the new iMac wirelessly.

4. 4th Generation 20GB iPod (which doesnt work for listening to music, only as an external drive)
 
ah, its my mom's now. i dont think she minds.

i'm skeptical about putting more ram in it because she'll still be limited by the small bus speed... is it worth it?
 
I got the memory a while ago, I don't think I remember a diffrence, however my computer is quiet slow, so I can't imagein what it would be like with out the 512 MB of ram.
 
penter said:
ah, its my mom's now. i dont think she minds.

i'm skeptical about putting more ram in it because she'll still be limited by the small bus speed... is it worth it?

it will DEFINATELY be worth it.
 
Here's my "computer room" ;)

17-inch-iMac-1.jpg

17-inch-iMac-2.jpg


I'm 17 BTW, if thats important :rolleyes:
 
ChrisBrightwell said:
What the hell is up with people putting subwoofers on their desks?

Do these things not come with drawings which indicate that a subwoofer belongs on the floor?!

why the hell does it matter?!
 
eXan said:
Here's my "computer room" ;)
17-inch-iMac-1.jpg

17-inch-iMac-2.jpg


the isub is meant for going under the desk, not above.
under the desk it sounds way better, because supposedly the sound reflects directly into your ear or something like that.
its not taht it MAY sound better; it DOES. its like in a theater. they wouldnt put in some random design in there that doesnt carry the sound wave properly, or that creates echos. anyways..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.