Yes. It’s only a few Hz more than the old ones. Still flickering a lot.I guess that is his experience (whoever he is), but I wouldn’t call that frequency “very high” at all.
Yes. It’s only a few Hz more than the old ones. Still flickering a lot.I guess that is his experience (whoever he is), but I wouldn’t call that frequency “very high” at all.
I paid $50 restocking when I had to return my max to T-Mobile last year. That, and the salesman looked at me like I was an alien because I told him it gave me a headache.
Within their notebooks the PWM is much much higher. So no Problem at all.
This COULD be true, but if you can focus fine on any phone besides an oled iPhone, the odds are very high it's the phone.Will reiterate what I stated earlier in the thread. People having this problem should get their eyes tested too. Some confuse the strain they are experiencing as being sourced from PWM, when it can actually be strain from extended periods of focusing too close.
I had an extensive test done by my eye doctor to see what was causing my strain, it turned out to be caused by extended periods of close focus, not the refresh rate of my device. I now try to wear computer glasses when I am on my phone (or laptop) for extended periods of time. My close focus has gotten better overall (even without glasses), and I don't get strain or headaches.
Sure PWM impacts people, many of them, but don't rule out other causes for your eye strain or headaches. If you are Near-sighted, try taking off your corrective lenses when using your phone, you are working your eyes much harder than you need to, as they need to overcome the correction, plus the close focus in that situation.
Just food for thought.
Thanks for posting this.a youtuber tweeted about pwm 11P :
I wish you the best of luck with your new phone!
It's good for him that he can now use Apples OLED but he's ignoring the full detail mentioned in review:Thanks for posting this.
For those that may not be aware, he is a YouTube tech reviewer who had experienced eye strain issues on the iPhone X.
The fact that he is not having the same issues with the iPhone 11P is a good sign and very relevant here.
Well there’s a wide variety of kinds and severity I can get, depending on the trigger. But that’s way off topic for this thread. The kind I got with an iPhone caused the part of my brain that controls speech to go haywire, and I had a little trouble controlling my hands. I can’t remember which one but one side was more unresponsive than the other.Btw, when you mentioned seizure migraines in another post, yikes, what does that mean exactly??
Yes I mentioned earlier in this thread that the original review was bogus as they misread their own graph. It clearly shows slower than 290hz if you measure it yourself, but they wrote the 290 anyway. Sloppy.https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-...ie-vielen-Detail-Verbesserungen.434752.0.html
So this review says 245 hz instead Of the other notebook check review that says 290.7 hz for PWM???? So confused
It is interesting that people like Zollotech who have reported on PWM before any press really touched the subject, who also suffered with the PWM on earlier OLED iPhones, is now saying the Pro Max isn't bothering him at all. Maybe whiles he's been reviewing it the phone is on very high brightness so he's not noticing it as much?Yes I mentioned earlier in this thread that the original review was bogus as they misread their own graph. It clearly shows slower than 290hz if you measure it yourself, but they wrote the 290 anyway. Sloppy.
Also this goes to show how much this issue is placebo induced that merely the (erroneous) suggestion that apple increased the PWM speed has people left, right and centre deciding that they no longer experience eyestrain and they shall keep their new phones.
That‘s definitely strange, since their graph for the regular Pro says 290hz. Could the Pro vs Pro Max have different Hz implementations?https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-...ie-vielen-Detail-Verbesserungen.434752.0.html
So this review says 245 hz instead Of the other notebook check review that says 290.7 hz for PWM???? So confused
I’m not sure what to think, since the Pro review has it at 290hz, while the Pro Max is at 245hz apparently. They either made a mistake with one of the numbers, or the two models have differing Hz rates.Also this goes to show how much this issue is placebo induced that merely the (erroneous) suggestion that apple increased the PWM speed has people left, right and centre deciding that they no longer experience eyestrain and they shall keep their new phones.
Thank you. Scary that a phone display can trigger that.Well there’s a wide variety of kinds and severity I can get, depending on the trigger. But that’s way off topic for this thread. The kind I got with an iPhone caused the part of my brain that controls speech to go haywire, and I had a little trouble controlling my hands. I can’t remember which one but one side was more unresponsive than the other.
So basically it looks like I’ve had a stroke of some kind. The one I got from the iPhone impacted my speech and motor control less than a day but I was hypersensitive to all pwm for about a month.
It sounds horrible to get that kind of migraine, but it’s been an informative experience that oddly enough enriched my connection to other people (more long off-topicness). But that doesn’t mean I want to get more of them! I’m really thrilled I get along well with my new iPhone.
Can you see that the original review graph is not measuring zero crossing to zero crossing? It is measuring inaccurately shorter than that and coming up with the 290hz figure. It is clearly a mistake but for some reason they don't care enough to notice.That‘s definitely strange, since their graph for the regular Pro says 290hz. Could the Pro vs Pro Max have different Hz implementations?
View attachment 864584
I’m not sure what to think, since the Pro review has it at 290hz, while the Pro Max is at 245hz apparently. They either made a mistake with one of the numbers, or the two models have differing Hz rates.
Well we can never rule out the placebo effect. That certainly is a phenomenon.Yes I mentioned earlier in this thread that the original review was bogus as they misread their own graph. It clearly shows slower than 290hz if you measure it yourself, but they wrote the 290 anyway. Sloppy.
Also this goes to show how much this issue is placebo induced that merely the (erroneous) suggestion that apple increased the PWM speed has people left, right and centre deciding that they no longer experience eyestrain and they shall keep their new phones.
Variables:Anyone have any updates on their experience with 11 pro ?
Don’t think there is much of a difference between 240 and 290hz?Variables:
“I still get eye strain.”
“I think I’m not getting eye strain now.”
Constants:
The iPhone 11 Pro still uses PWM. It still uses a frequency that is either identical to the last two years or only slightly higher. There’s no reason to believe if you had issues with previous OLED models that the latest will be any different. Everyone has their own experience, but based on the technical specifications there shouldn’t be any change in whether or not you are affected.
It's almost as if people don't even read the responses just before them when they post here. This has now been repeated ad nauseum and so has the response.It's weird with the PWM, NBC said it was higher at 290 hz however that review says that the frequency is irregular and ranges between 60 and 290.7 hz, also the NBC review for the pro max says 245 hz pwm and the regular pro says 290.7 hz, So very strange and inconsistent, links down below:
https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-...-mehr-Power-auf-den-Handy-Olymp.434956.0.html
https://www.notebookcheck.com/Test-...ie-vielen-Detail-Verbesserungen.434752.0.html
I apologize thenIt's almost as if people don't even read the responses just before them when they post here. This has now been repeated ad nauseum and so has the response.