I amAnyone else thinking of trying the 15 Plus after seeing these results?
I amAnyone else thinking of trying the 15 Plus after seeing these results?
I like your post and I agree with it. The trouble I see is trying to standardize some testing. It seems like the measurements have been all over the place. Particularly from notebook check and other random sources. Also, it seems like PWM isn't everything with these OLED screens. Dithering, and even promotion for some folks. So while I agree with everything you said; I still feel like numbers are great, but I'm still not gonna know what works for me until I try it out for a week.Yes I do agree but allow me to speak on why we have to do so.
The reason why we have to rely on measurements and numbers is because screen technology is becoming more complex than ever. The concept of a flickering screen verse a flicker free screen no longer exist in today's context.
Instead,they are now on a spectrum where all of them flickers. The question is on how badly it flickers, and whether is that flickering percivable at the said range. Thus the only way we can determine the range of the flicker is to quantify it.
Some may be more affected by it, while some aren't. It is like our weather temperature. To someone living in the far east 26 degrees (or 78 F) is a cool weather but to someone living in the northern europe it is perhaps very hot. We wouldn't know whats really hot or cold unless we quantify in terms of numbers.
Panel variant could be a possibility since it is a well known fact in China. Large companies like Honor or Xiaomi relies on two or more suppliers. When the experience delivered by different screen suppliers distinctly varies, it is called "screen lottery". This was how the term first originated from.
Apple could well be using from different screen suppliers and we wouldn't know if there is a lottery unless we quantify them through measurement
Yes, but doesn't that just apply to the pro models? I wasn't aware that the regular 15 and 15+ got any GPU improvementsAlso another factor to mix everything up, Joz during his presentation of the 15PM, spent quite a while extolling the virtues of the new GPU in the Pro iPhones. Mentioning something like it was the biggest redesign of iPhone GPU in the history of iPhone.
I know from experience on a computer that upgrading a graphics card (GPU) can make the display look different - usually better.
So its not correct to say that the 14 and 15 iPhone screens are essentially the same because the GPU driving those two phones is radically different.
I do agree that when the sources are becoming saturated, especially from the likes of trusted sources like notebookcheck where they reported good news and we're still getting symptoms from it.I like your post and I agree with it. The trouble I see is trying to standardize some testing. It seems like the measurements have been all over the place. Particularly from notebook check and other random sources. Also, it seems like PWM isn't everything with these OLED screens. Dithering, and even promotion for some folks. So while I agree with everything you said; I still feel like numbers are great, but I'm still not gonna know what works for me until I try it out for a week.
I appreciate your hard work at testing these things. I'm sorry it comes at the cost of physical discomfort!I do agree that when the sources are becoming saturated, especially from the likes of trusted sources like notebookcheck where they reported good news and we're still getting symptoms from it.
It would be great if return policy is available in every country though!
As right now I am looking at 8 different phones in front of me with a usage time of less than 5 hours each. It's not even more than a day per se and I can't use them anymore because of severe headaches.
I wish us both luck!I am
Thank you so much for being the first source with PWM measurements. We look forward to future insights and unique perspectives.I do agree that when the sources are becoming saturated, especially from the likes of trusted sources like notebookcheck where they reported good news and we're still getting symptoms from it.
It would be great if return policy is available in every country though!
As right now I am looking at 8 different phones in front of me with a usage time of less than 5 hours each. It's not even more than a day per se and I can't use them anymore because of severe headaches.
At some point some of us have to draw the line and say no.My brain is remembering that constant PWM throbbing
@from reddit the_top_gFinally got some time to drop by a store for a short test with the Radex Lupin. They had the 15, 15 Pro, and 15 Pro Max on display; the 15 Plus was missing (this was an electronics store, not an Apple Store).
Here are the test results; all measurements were taken with auto brightness off; RWP measurements were taken at 100% brightness.
Model 100% 75% 50% 25% RWP 25% RWP 50% RWP 75% RWP 90% iPhone 15 5.2 6.5 10 12 5 5 5.2 7 iPhone 15 Pro 12.3 13.5 16.2 19 12.7 13.5 14.9 17.3
My previous measurements of the 14 range are here: iPhone 14 measurements
The 15 Pro Max was essentially the same as the 15 Pro.
Note: The brightness settings are a rough estimation (i.e. what brightness it is, since the slider doesn't show any percentage; so it is possible that there is a bit of +/- movement regarding what exact brightness the phone was at).
Note 2: Interestingly, just measuring a 14 that I have at home, here are its values (here, I use a shortcut to set the brightness directly, so the brightness setting can be assumed to be accurate):
Model 100% 75% 50% 25% RWP 25% RWP 50% RWP 75% RWP 90% iPhone 14 4 6.8 9.9 12 3.9 4.2 4.8 6.8
These are slightly different to the measurements I've taken in my previous link above, but I think that is probably explained by the brightness slider inaccuracy.
Note 3: RWP 95% on the iPhone 14 measures ~8.4.
Preliminary conclusion: It seems that the 14 and 15 are aligned, as well as the 14 Pro and the 15 Pro. Minor differences in values, I would suggest are explained by the difference between in store measurement with a brightness slider, and using a shortcut for the 14 that I have at home.
I think if one was to give a model a go, then the 15/15 Plus would be the ones, and run it at 100% brightness, with a RWP setting that isn't too bright. The Radex Lupin manual says that measurement for office monitors should not exceed 5%, and light flickering for visually focused tasks should not exceed 10%. Light flickering up to 20% for all other tasks is acceptable, according to the manual.
So, potentially 100% brightness, with an RWP between 75% and 90%, and use Night Shift/Colour Filters to adjust intensity/colours, may be the best bet to try, at least based on these measurements, and not accounting for people's different reactions.
Thank you so much for being the first source with PWM measurements. We look forward to future insights and unique perspectives.
Would you be able to test an iPhone 13 mini out of curiosity as well as newer smartphones like the Motorola Razr+ with/without the Flicker Reduction as well as the Galaxy Fold/Flip?
Before the line/suggestion inbox gets too large.
Welcome to the party!Oh you have probably thought too highly of me! I am just as equal as everyone here.
For iphone 13 mini, that might be difficult as it is now obselete here from where I'm here.
With the Motorola Razr+ I have no access either.
With most samsung oled smartphone though, I tend to avoid even looking at them because its flickers often triggers my epileptic like seizures. Thus I've developed a fear of even looking at it, to be honest!
I have an idea about disabling auto-brightness the second that the iPhone is removed from the box, this may even be possible during setup as Apple allows for some Accessibility customization, then using Reduce White Point exclusively. The point on Pro models is to avoid exposure to varying frequencies, as 100% was measured as the most stable sine wave by far.Anyone else thinking of trying the 15 Plus after seeing these results? I had no plans to order anything but I'm thinking of giving it a shot. I had the 14PM last year and returned it. I never tried the 100% brightness and 80-90% RWP setting though, so I want to try it on this phone and see how I tolerate it.
The batteries are so large on these devices that this shouldn’t create a real-world concern. There are people out there that un-ironically run their devices at 100% brightness all the time just because they enjoy a bright display, example: Flossy Carter.I see some people recommending 100% brightness and a high RWP. Doesn't that absolutely drain the battery?
I am worried realistically since there’s not enough that seems to be changed for it to be any different this year.Good luck to all who plan on trying a new device. I apologise if I’ve killed off anyone’s hopes.
I’m pretty down about the whole thing once again as this is the 6th year of no hope for me. Right now the back of my eyes are throbbing and I have brain fog + tension. After returning the 15PM, my day has been a right off - so please be careful, think of your health. 🙏
Going to the Apple Store in a bit and picking up the 15 Plus and immediately setting the brightness at 100% and the RWP between 80 and 90% with the auto brightness off. I'm cautiously optimistic.I have an idea about disabling auto-brightness the second that the iPhone is removed from the box, this may even be possible during setup as Apple allows for some Accessibility customization, then using Reduce White Point exclusively. The point on Pro models is to avoid exposure to varying frequencies, as 100% was measured as the most stable sine wave by far.
iPhone 15 Pro allows for the Action button to toggle Accessibility settings, so while this is a boring use of the function it may make a difference in the usability of switching it on and off.
We are doing quite a bit to barely make these iPhones usable, but going a step further would be Shortcuts that automatically change the brightness or possibly even the Reduce White Point settings at different times during the day.
I did buy a Canon M200 on clearance recently, and expect phenomenal quality out of it.At some point some of us have to draw the line and say no.
For some of us, an OLED display on any device is a no-go.
Gotta remember that if iPhones didn't have cameras, most people wouldn't upgrade as often as they do. Nothing much changes except the camera and SOC.
Pro Tip:
Buy a real camera that's only a camera. It will take superior pictures to an iPhone probably for 20 years... then you'll discover that there's suddenly little reason to upgrade an iPhone.
I do too, but sadly, there’s no clue for this to happen.I am worried realistically since there’s not enough that seems to be changed for it to be any different this year.
I’ve already tried every combination of Accessibility/brightness settings and Shortcuts on previous OLED iPhones.
At least my consolation is that the iPad Pro 11” has a lovely Liquid Retina display without PWM, which is quite possibly the nicest LCD that Apple has shipped. The M2 chip should also be able to run standout apps like Resident Evil: Village, although in retrospect maybe I should have gotten more storage—I am curious how developers/Apple will handle this since so many devices have limited storage already.
I still wish for a flicker-free Accessibility setting where there’s zero flicker at all, as I would love to be using these new iPhones and any flicker is absolutely detrimental to our health. But the definition of insanity is doing the same task over and over and expecting a different result, and that applies here: I can’t count how many times I’ve powered off my iPhone and thought that it would be okay to use next time it was powered on at I.e. 100% brightness using Reduce White Point, or purchased an iPhone thinking that it would be better and usable this generation. It’s probably not.
We are all waiting your tomorrow findingsGoing to the Apple Store in a bit and picking up the 15 Plus and immediately setting the brightness at 100% and the RWP between 80 and 90% with the auto brightness off. I'm cautiously optimistic.