Yeah. I wonder how much more battery would we have gotten if the S6's thickness was as thick as the camera.
It's not very much at all, and obviously not all that extra space would be applicable for the battery, so... what would that tiny extra thickness buy the battery size, really? Another 50 or 100 mAh?
I do wonder.
Anything helps though, I guess.
I'm definitely not seeing 4-5 hours of SOT like many are. I'm averaging more 2-3, which is decent. But as I've said before, the main difference between the S6 and the iPhone 6 in battery usage is wireless charging and quick charge. They are game-changing features when compared to a phone without either of those two features. Used accordingly, they allow zero worry about battery life.
Just to use my personal experience this morning...
I just got to work around 10 AM with about 88% battery left. I have a solid one hour commute, of which maybe 40 mins are on the phone. Playing music through bluetooth earphones, running Flipboard, a ton of Hangout messages, browsing the web via Chrome, and checking/replying to an email or two. I should also mention it's been off charger for longer than an hour.
Now it's a little past 1030, and my phone has been on the wireless charger for the past 15 mins or so. Device is back up to 92% already. EDIT: 100% now. Not even 11 AM.
And because I'm using more of a wireless charging stand (instead of a pad), the device is upright and I can still see/get all my notifications and essentially use my phone even while it's on the charging stand.
I love it.
I understand that for those who don't have an office job or however else the wireless charging and quick charge aren't applicable, they would not be satisfied with the battery life. Those people, I guess, should really look into battery packs and/or phablets. The S6 likely cannot fill their need.