Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

nj-morris

macrumors 68000
Nov 30, 2014
1,897
804
UK
I hope Arya and Bran make it to Winterfell and we get to see a Stark family reunion of sorts. I can just picture the dinner conversation:

Sansa: I was married twice and my second husband raped me. I had him eaten by his own dogs for that.

Arya: I can top that. I was blind for a while, recovered my sight, was stabbed, recovered, and dispatched my killer with Needle in the dark. Oh yeah, I slit Walder Frey's throat, too.

Jon: That's nothing. I fought White Walkers, was killed by my own men, brought to life by a red priestess, almost suffocated in battle, and re-took Winterfell.

Bran: Ha! You guys are pathetic. I've become the three-eyed raven and can pretty much time-travel anyplace I want. Pass the salt.

Bran: Oh and by the by Jon, I found out who your parents are.
[doublepost=1467102072][/doublepost]
That final scene on the ships takes place weeks after the scene in Dorne. Looking at the sails, you can see sigils for the various families that have joined behind Dany at that point. So Varys traveled back to Meereen with the Martell ships before setting sail for Westeros.

Targaryan/Dothraki:
2jb1kjq.png
Greyjoy:
eaft39.png
Tyrell (green on the top left):
2hggrxc.png
Martell (brown/red on the right):
108ekcm.png

Nice. I think by the end it will be everybody rooting for Daenerys, because so many people hate Cersei.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ActionableMango

bandrews

macrumors 6502a
Jul 18, 2008
888
2,204
Tip: Never watch GOT with your mother-in-law. Cersei's monologue to Septa Unella and Bronn and Jamie's exchange was painful.
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
Tip: Never watch GOT with your mother-in-law. Cersei's monologue to Septa Unella and Bronn and Jamie's exchange was painful.
That was more or less a given from the first episodes with all the nudity and sex and all kinds of other stuff "sprinkled in" in quite a few places.
 

bandrews

macrumors 6502a
Jul 18, 2008
888
2,204
That was more or less a given from the first episodes with all the nudity and sex and all kinds of other stuff "sprinkled in" in quite a few places.

Yeah, but she is staying and said she hadn't seen it before but had heard it was good. Well now she knows HOW good.
 

Huntn

macrumors Core
Original poster
May 5, 2008
23,977
27,056
The Misty Mountains
Great episode, still an outline! :D

I think we now know that Jon Snow is not Edward Stark's bastard son, but a Stark by his sister who may of had sexual relations with a Targarian, which may make Jon and Daenerys related, maybe even brother and sister. :eek:

Or she might play a role that would be helpful in one way or another once again (similar to bringing Jon back to life...assuming that all turns out to be a good thing in the end, as we all assume and hope to be the case).

You never know! :)

Not to be constantly griping about the differences between the show and the book, but...
Stannis never burned his daughter, so The Red woman was not quite as bad and the Onion Knight and Jon Snow would not have been as upset. She could have a role.

In the book, did'nt we last see Cercei on her way back to Casterly Rock after being humiliated? Her being crowned queen seems to be a huge divergence in story telling. And what happened to the Lannister Uncle who was supervising the crown until Tomen came of age to rule? Or was that a Baratheon? I'd think he'd be next in line.
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
Great episode, still an outline! :D

I think we now know that Jon Snow is not Edward Stark's bastard son, but a Stark by his sister who may of had sexual relations with a Targarian, which may make Jon and Daenerys related, maybe even brother and sister. :eek:



You never know! :)

Not to be constantly griping about the differences between the show and the book, but...
Stannis never burned his daughter, so The Red woman was not quite as bad and the Onion Knight and Jon Snow would not have been as upset. She could have a role.

In the book, did'nt we last see Cercei on her way back to Casterly Rock after being humiliated? Her being crowned queen seems to be a huge divergence in story telling. And what happened to the Lannister Uncle who was supervising the crown until Tomen came of age to rule? Or was that a Baratheon? I'd think he'd be next in line.
More specifically nephew and aunt.
 

Renzatic

Suspended
Well, L was confirmed, but unless I missed something, R is still an assumption. Mind you, I haven't read the books, so I'm just going off the scope of the show. If it is true (which, lets face it, it probably will be), can Jon even be the true heir, because technically he's still a bastard son?

If his lineage can be proven, yeah. From that point, he's no longer Ned Stark's bastard son. He's the son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark.

Though that'd only make him an heir, not the heir, since Daenerys is his elder, direct descendant of the old king, and is still kicking around.
 

giantfan1224

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2012
870
1,115
In the book, did'nt we last see Cercei on her way back to Casterly Rock after being humiliated? Her being crowned queen seems to be a huge divergence in story telling. And what happened to the Lannister Uncle who was supervising the crown until Tomen came of age to rule? Or was that a Baratheon? I'd think he'd be next in line.
I believe you're referring to Uncle Kevan who, along with his son Lancel, was killed during the incineration of the Sept of Baelor.
[doublepost=1467154476][/doublepost]
If his lineage can be proven, yeah. From that point, he's no longer Ned Stark's bastard son. He's the son of Rhaegar Targaryen and Lyanna Stark.
Doesn't that still make him a bastard but by a different name?
Though that'd only make him an heir, not the heir, since Daenerys is his elder, direct descendant of the old king, and is still kicking around.
Daenerys is only the heir because there is no trueborn male heir in the mix. If Jon were not a bastard of Rhaegar and Lyanna then he would have a better claim, according to the traditional custom.
 
Last edited:

zmunkz

macrumors 6502a
Nov 4, 2007
921
229
Doesn't that still make him a bastard but by a different name?

Yes, except the Targaryens were much looser with this sort of thing. It is not clear to me how succession should flow... Rhaegar is Daenerys older brother, so does his son come first, or his sister? Succession and gender roles are a little complicated in the series.

I'm also curious who will confront Cersi. The same prophecy that called for the death of her children said she would die at the hands of her younger brother, but that could be Jamie, or else interpreted as the army with which Tyrion now rides.

The Nerdist YouTube channel made a good case for Arya assuming the role of Lady Stoneheart. Good way to consolidate stories.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlliFlowers

AustinIllini

macrumors G5
Oct 20, 2011
12,699
10,566
Austin, TX
As a Targaryen, Jon Snow would be next in line after his father. However, none of this matters because the Targaryen dynasty fell. From the point Robert usurped the throne, the Targaryens have had no real claim to the throne either way. I don't feel Jon wants to be King. Quite the opposite, I feel he would prefer and alliance (or marriage) to Danaerys. Of course, everyone immediately goes "Well, they're cousins". First, no one really knows they're cousins. Second, the Targaryens are not the family that cares about any of that.
 

nj-morris

macrumors 68000
Nov 30, 2014
1,897
804
UK
As a Targaryen, Jon Snow would be next in line after his father. However, none of this matters because the Targaryen dynasty fell. From the point Robert usurped the throne, the Targaryens have had no real claim to the throne either way. I don't feel Jon wants to be King. Quite the opposite, I feel he would prefer and alliance (or marriage) to Danaerys. Of course, everyone immediately goes "Well, they're cousins". First, no one really knows they're cousins. Second, the Targaryens are not the family that cares about any of that.

He's still a bastard though. Targaryens might be messed up with the whole brother and sister, but that doesn't mean that bastards have any claims unless they are legitimised. And I highly doubt Cersei would allow that to happen.
 

AustinIllini

macrumors G5
Oct 20, 2011
12,699
10,566
Austin, TX
He's still a bastard though. Targaryens might be messed up with the whole brother and sister, but that doesn't mean that bastards have any claims unless they are legitimised. And I highly doubt Cersei would allow that to happen.
He was just proclaimed King in the North. I wouldn't even worry about the bastard thing
 

fitshaced

macrumors 68000
Jul 2, 2011
1,742
3,632
He was just proclaimed King in the North. I wouldn't even worry about the bastard thing
Surely he is the son of Lyanna Stark and Robert Baratheon? We know Lyanna is his mother but the whole 'black of hair' issue got Ned Stark killed in a way. So, he is the true heir to Roberts throne.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Huntn

Huntn

macrumors Core
Original poster
May 5, 2008
23,977
27,056
The Misty Mountains
I believe you're referring to Uncle Kevan who, along with his son Lancel, was killed during the incineration of the Sept of Baelor.
[doublepost=1467154476][/doublepost]
Doesn't that still make him a bastard but by a different name?

Daenerys is only the heir because there is no trueborn male heir in the mix. If Jon were not a bastard of Rhaegar and Lyanna then he would have a better claim, according to the traditional custom.

Not saying you are wrong, I did not notice hm. I thought he had been absent from the show this season.
[doublepost=1467206056][/doublepost]
Surely he is the son of Lyanna Stark and Robert Baratheon? We know Lyanna is his mother but the whole 'black of hair' issue got Ned Stark killed in a way. So, he is the true heir to Roberts throne.

Very interesting! :)
 

BernyMac

macrumors regular
May 18, 2015
201
676
USA
I am afraid of what might happen once Bran Stark crosses the wall. If the Night King was able to get him in the cave of the Three Eyed Raven because of the mark he gave Bran, will that mark negate the magic that is imbedded in The Wall?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tilpots

giantfan1224

macrumors 6502a
Mar 9, 2012
870
1,115
I am afraid of what might happen once Bran Stark crosses the wall. If the Night King was able to get him in the cave of the Three Eyed Raven because of the mark he gave Bran, will that mark negate the magic that is imbedded in The Wall?
So what you're saying is Bran is about to realy $%^& things up!
 

Huntn

macrumors Core
Original poster
May 5, 2008
23,977
27,056
The Misty Mountains
I am afraid of what might happen once Bran Stark crosses the wall. If the Night King was able to get him in the cave of the Three Eyed Raven because of the mark he gave Bran, will that mark negate the magic that is imbedded in The Wall?

I did not know there was magic in the wall, that it was just a big frick'n wall. Happy to be educated. :) :oops:
 

C DM

macrumors Sandy Bridge
Oct 17, 2011
51,392
19,461
I am afraid of what might happen once Bran Stark crosses the wall. If the Night King was able to get him in the cave of the Three Eyed Raven because of the mark he gave Bran, will that mark negate the magic that is imbedded in The Wall?
Not sure how the "mark" would have an effect like that.
 

BernyMac

macrumors regular
May 18, 2015
201
676
USA
Not sure how the "mark" would have an effect like that.
During the first meeting with Bran's group at the cave of the Three Eyed Raven, the children of the forest claimed that the walkers cannot set foot in the cave because it is protected. The whole "Hold the door!" debacle was because Bran got marked and the protection of the cave is no longer in effect. And that mark is still on him and the reason why he can be tracked by the walkers. Benjen said the wall is protected by magic and he can't cross it. If Bran cross the wall, it may cause that protection to disappear in the same way as the cave of the Three Eyed Raven.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.