Multimedia said:I noticed your 3DMARK is not set at 1440x900 native res. Any reason why?
Yes, the free version does not allow you to change any of the settings.
Multimedia said:I noticed your 3DMARK is not set at 1440x900 native res. Any reason why?
Multimedia said:135º has already been reported by a new owner.
Rocketman said:Are you implying (stating) this is a PC gamers machine now?
That would be revolutionary.
Rocketman
bcavanau said:Yes, the free version does not allow you to change any of the settings.
raxrat said:Got mine today at Apple Store Fashion Valley in San Diego. They had both 2.16 and 2.33, but only had 2.33 in matte. CPU is there like last logic board revision for CD MBP (think they are the same). I think the C2D MBP does not heat up as much. Overall build quality much better than my old MBP. The screen actually closes flush, can you believe that!!! I got mine despite the fact that they still only offer ATI X1600 (now less underclocked than before) and no magnetic latch. Come on Apple, these latches suck! Overall happy and glad the misery of living w/o a Mac is over.
Zadillo said:Really, it's not like there's another GPU on the market right now they could put in a 1" thick 15" MBP that would offer much better performance.
bcavanau said:Started my updating again
Just posted:
- 3DMark06
- Super PI (OSX)
- Super PI (XP)
- XBench
As always, available at http://lartren.com/mac
raxrat said:Fair enough. I had hoped the merger of ATI and AMD would have produced a counter move already. I still think the next MBP revision will have an NVIDIA. Will eat my hat if not.
That is so cool. How does light pass through aluminum?Nightkrawler said:
bcavanau said:Started my updating again
Just posted:
- 3DMark06
- Super PI (OSX)
- Super PI (XP)
- XBench
As always, available at http://lartren.com/mac
Owners Manual says it can open to 135º on page 69.duderodamus said:Unless I am way off. Mine only opens 120º. Thought it was stuck but going further feels like it's gonna crack.
Zadillo said:I know some people will say "no", but I really think this depends on what games you are playing and what your expectations and needs are out of a laptop to play games with.
I really disagree with NewSc2 in particular, saying that the answer is no because the X1600 is not "cream of the crop".
No, the X1600 isn't the absolute end-all/be-all of mobile CPU's. If you spend a lot of money, you can get a 10 pound 2" thick gaming behomoth with a GeForce 7950gtx Go in it, that will be incredibly powerful.
But a lot of people don't need that.
Even the boutique gaming PC companies like VoodooPC and Alienware sell 15" gaming laptops, and those machines typicall feature either a GeForce 7600 or an X1600. For the 15" form factor especially, these are basically close to the cream of the crop right now.
...
So yes, I think this is something that could be called a gamer's machine. It would of course be silly for someone whose primary purpose was gaming to buy a MBP, as there are other options out there. But for someone who wants an MBP for other reasons, but also does like to have some gaming capabilities, it looks like it is now a much more reasonable machine to do so with.
-Zadillo
NewSc2 said:By your logic, you could even game with a Macbook. It runs WoW admirably. Right now I don't really consider myself a "gamer" but I'm running my PC rig for gaming, and I get decent FPS.
I would by NO means call it a gamer's machine. In fact, I'm embarrassed when I take it to LAN parties -- everybody's loading BF2 twice as fast as I am.
Alienware? Their current "gamer" notebook can be specced to Dual 512MB GeForce Go 7900 GS video cards. 3DMark benchies for 1 of these cards is in the 7700~ range, almost twice that of MBP's.
When I think "a gamer's computer" I don't think "most people don't need that" -- I think "top of the line, 1600x1200 8xAA, full settings." In fact, I would never think laptop, except for 10-lb. behemoths. "A gamer's machine" is a Windows desktop.
bob_hearn said:Hmm, I think I regret going with the 160 now.
Zadillo said:Just as a note, it looks like that superpi on OS X is off (it should take twice as long to calculate Pi to 2 million digits).
The Windows version still seems like it should be faster to me too though (just since a 2.16GHz C2D calculates it in about 58 seconds), but it's close enough that there's probably other variables at play.
Oops my bad. I though for sure someone reported 135º. So sorry.
I found this on apple's website doing a search:
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en/MacBookPro_15and17-inch_Core2Duo_UserGuide.pdf
is this the guide you are refering to?
has anyone seen mbp's with 160gb hard drives in the apple stores? or is this option only available through order? thanks
Well, page 69 of the manual says
"Built-in Display
Adjust the angle of the display to minimize glare and reflections from overhead lights
and windows. Do not force the display if you meet resistance. The display is not meant
to open past 135 degrees. "
From here:
The 160 is part of the 17" stock. I think the 17" stock is the almost perfect C2D '06-'07 mobile Mac.The two stores that I called said they would only be carrying the "stock configurations - no hard drive upgrades". I got the impression, but didn't ask, that it was an Apple Store policy.
It's too big IMO. BTW, when do you sleep? You're on here 24/7/365.The 160 is part of the 17" stock. I think the 17" stock is a perfect Mac.
The 160 is part of the 17" stock. I think the 17" stock is a perfect mobile Mac.
The 160 is part of the 17" stock. I think the 17" stock is the perfect C2D '06-'07 mobile Mac.