http://www.seatguru.com lets you check which seats have power ports beforehand.
Thats just nuts!! this internet.... I tell you my friends...
http://www.seatguru.com lets you check which seats have power ports beforehand.
I understand that companies try and round up, but 111 to 120? That doesn't even make sense (Hitachi for what it's worth).
It's not a question of rounding up. Your 120GB disk is a 120 billion byte disk.
120,000,000,000 bytes
/1024 = 117,118,500 kbytes
/1024 = 114440.92 mbytes
/1024 = 111.76 gbytes
Disks have been marketed this way since the beginning of disks, it just didn't take as big a chunk out when they were 32MB disks (31250kbyte,30.5mbyte).
It's that pesky extra 24 bytes in a kbyte that kills you. I say we vote them off the island.
(oh, and you're right, the 200G disk will be 186.26gbyte useable)
That's par for a 120. The 200 will be about 189 net.I understand that companies try and round up, but 111 to 120? That doesn't even make sense (Hitachi for what it's worth).
No. upgrading the drive yourself may violate your warranty. Very difficult to get to it as well. It's like brain surgery going into a MBP to change HDs - not advised.Now, my real question. I am considering returning this MBP and ordering a 200 GB hard drive (which is probably 186, I will bet $5 on it!!). I am already down to 78 gigs on my drive, and it's not even a week old. 78!?! Geez. I can afford the hit financially. Should I just wait and upgrade the drive myself?
A 120gb LMR drive should be exactly as good and as fast as a 120gb PMR drive, so what's the problem?You lucked out on getting the Hitachi. Many here have gotten Fujitsu LMRs. I'm a little disappointed Apple didn't decide to go 100% PMR this refresh. But this is only an issue on the lower capacity HDs anyway.
Really? I have a Maxtor 200GB HD that is net 189.8GB available. Are net capacities different for 3.5" drives than they are for 2.5" drives?It's not a question of rounding up. Your 120GB disk is a 120 billion byte disk.
120,000,000,000 bytes
/1024 = 117,118,500 kbytes
/1024 = 114440.92 mbytes
/1024 = 111.76 gbytes
Disks have been marketed this way since the beginning of disks, it just didn't take as big a chunk out when they were 32MB disks (31250kbyte,30.5mbyte).
It's that pesky extra 24 bytes in a kbyte that kills you. I say we vote them off the island.
(oh, and you're right, the 200G disk will be 186.26gbyte useable)
Hmmm... where did you hear that? It's been awfully quiet around Director for a very long time now, even before Adobe bought MM.Apparently a universal Director version is on the way - phew!
Who said anything about a problem? I'm simply a perpendicular whore now. No problem. I agree with you completely.A 120gb LMR drive should be exactly as good and as fast as a 120gb PMR drive, so what's the problem?
No.Hello Guys,
Hello Multimedia, it's seem like you are the big HD expert here so it's good to address my question to you, I guess.
I'm will go for a MBP 17" for the end of the month. I never used mac, I just have a bit o Windows experience so I have no idea about mac software, just think it's worth to change
I thought I should better go for a 100 GB HD as it runs at 7200rpm, because I would like the fastest, portable machine there is and until now I was perfectly living with a 60GB HD on my actual pc. I bought an external HD where I save all my pictures and other stuff so I keep the hd for installing programs.
First question: are 100GB 7200rmb HD Fujistsu or Hitachi? Do you think it would make much difference for a common private user?
Yes. Lots of bigger files becoming more prevelant - esp Video Podcasts etc.Second one: do you think I should go for a bigger drive, and if yes, why?
Not likely. Bigger means cooler. Waiting for reports from first receivers.Third: do 17" mac suffer any problems with fans, screen, hotness or else?
I doubt you will really notice a difference between a 100GB 7200rpm (hot battery hog and small) HD and a 200GB 4200rpm (cool battery miser and big) HD. The 17" MBPs are still not in yet. Any day now. I think that if you can afford the $200 hit, having 200GB inside will benefit you long term because there is a lot of multimedia online that loves to fly down the pipe to your local storage for a visit.I'm a bit worried about buying such a new machine, you know?
It's not a question of rounding up. Your 120GB disk is a 120 billion byte disk.
120,000,000,000 bytes
/1024 = 117,118,500 kbytes
/1024 = 114440.92 mbytes
/1024 = 111.76 gbytes
Can someone explain to a dumb computer programmer about inverters? I'm a software man, not a hardware man!
Ugh, i just saw this post, pulled out my magsafe airline adapter and am seeing the same thing.....
Why on earth didnt I think of that before I bought it, just assumed as it LOOKS like a car charger that it would work...
Just out of curiousity, has anyone actually TRIED to plug it in to a car cigarette lighter to see if it does work?
No.Yes. Lots of bigger files becoming more prevelant - esp Video Podcasts etc.Not likely. Bigger means cooler. Waiting for reports from first receivers.I doubt you will really notice a difference between a 100GB 7200rpm (hot battery hog and small) HD and a 200GB 4200rpm (cool battery miser and big) HD. The 17" MBPs are still not in yet. Any day now. I think that if you can afford the $200 hit, having 200GB inside will benefit you long term because there is a lot of multimedia online that loves to fly down the pipe to your local storage for a visit.
We have testimony from a 200GB MBP owner several pages back that it is plenty fast including able to easily capture and edit DV with no drop outs.
It won't, the airline electrical source is 24V as I remember it. Your auto is 12V.
Of course, you don't really get all that 111GB. A lot is wasted in indirect blocks, inode tables, and other overhead. And then you oughtn't plan to use more that 80% if you want good performance. Might as well just say that 120GB disk is good for 80GB and be done with it.
...
It's like brain surgery going into a MBP to change HDs - not advised.
...
This is not really true, filesystem overhead is taken into account when OS X r
Also, filling a drive to above 80% capacity has no effect on performance - where are you getting that information from?
Also, filling a drive to above 80% capacity has no effect on performance - where are you getting that information from?
So does that mean the MBP internally can handle 24V, but not 12V? That seems like a major oversight if true. Surely if it can handle 24V, I don't need a massive brick of an invertor just to convert 12V?