Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

gpatpandp

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2010
309
11
Sorry Wayne I did not intentionally mean to initiate a hackintosh discussion. I was just trying to draw a comparison to installing OS X on unsupported machines and the ease I experienced in doing do on a non-apple computer compared to an actual apple mac.

Again to those who own unsupported Mac Pro's, I cannot stress enough in suggesting the use of an alternative method found easily when googling "10.8 Mac Pro 1,1". Simply put, a successful install using this method is full proof and will result in EVERYTHING working (i.e. repair permissions, the ability to install apple system updates and for that matter any other application including Little Snitch, iMessage, FaceTime. iCloud just as you would normally, full native 64 bit mode available at your disposal etc.) The ONLY app that I have found that does not work using this method is the Expansion Slot Utility app. That however should be expected as the whole premise of running 10.8 on unsupported Macs is replacing Apple's EFI which will not allow it with a given boot loader EFI that will. The Expansion Slot Utility will only work with Apple's EFI and therefore once replaced with Chameleons (or Clover etc) EFI it ceases to operate.

The beauty of the unsupported Mac Pro in the case of running 10.8 is that with an simple Video Card upgrade (an Apple ATI HD 5770 does quite nicely) your good as gold as they say. Why is this the case ? Simply because within 10.8 , there exist 64 bit kext's that will fully support OS X 10.8 and the video card upgrade respectively. This same "beauty" of the Mac Pro is truly the absolute determent to all other unsupported Macs save those whose computers possess the X3100 video card as by sheer accident, apple includes a 64 bit kext in OS X 10.8 to support it.

My hack experiment with an unsupported Intel iMac 17" 2.0 GHz X1600 graphics with OS X 10.8.3 runs everything (almost) perfectly: iSight/Facetime, iCloud, repair permissions, boots without issue, sleeps, installed the 10.8.3 Combo update from the App Store without any issues whatsoever etc. The only issue of course is graphics. I in fact found a thread that was near a year old where Wayne and MLforAll stumbled upon the exact same dilemma and I would bet this rather large hurdle remains as the primary challenge as they attempt to move the project forward. One as to wonder though if that indeed the only answer is mixing, patching and intertwining 32 bit into 64 bit if any real measure of stability can ever be possibly achieved. Though as I have only been at this (trying to hack the iMac) literally five or six days I admittedly would not be the one to address this question to.
 

Doritez

macrumors member
Mar 16, 2013
38
0
Bluetooth bugs

Bluetooth buggy for me in v0.2.2 can install my bluetooth headset (BH-305) but it wont work (no sound cant/turn up volume)
worked before in v0.2 please can someone provide a fix
 

tpho

macrumors newbie
Aug 6, 2012
20
0
I've been using ML since September on my MacBooks and have found it to be fast and responsive. One of my computers has GMA 950 graphics, the other has GMA 3100 graphics.
Do you mean the GMA X3100 or GMA 3100? They are two different chips.

I cannot really relpy 2 u as I have a hackintosh but for my personal experience lion is still a bit better than Mlion in one of my laptops
On the other as is fully compatible with Mlion I would rate both os as same it depends if you want icluod and imessasge
Why is lion slow for you???
What are you specs???
My fujitsu almost indentical in specs as macbook early 2008
Intel C2D 2.1Ghz CPU
Intel GMA X3100
4GB RAM

Lion is slow because for some reason my Macbook doesn't have full QE/CI. I have done fresh installs more than once. Lion recognizes my CPU and integrated graphics, but won't fully enable QE/CI. Opening Launchpad and Mission Control, watching youtube, etc is very laggy and slow.

I've got it running on my '08 Black MB. Been stable for several weeks now, though it suffers from the standard woes (no mDNS name resolution, flickering video). I've been waiting for 0.3, rather than move files around myself, as this isn't terribly critical — the only thing I really miss is my network-based Time Machine backup to my Mac Mini's Drobo.
What are the specs on your Black MB? Was Lion slow for you?
 

godzfire

macrumors regular
May 20, 2013
108
16
Look, I have a Mac Pro 1.1 with an upgraded genuine Apple Radeon HD 5880.

I don't care if it's via this thread's method or another one offsite, I just want to know where I can find the method that is MOST COMPATIBLE with my machine and able to be upgraded normally.

Any help is appreciated.
 

gpatpandp

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2010
309
11
godzfire

Google: How I installed Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion on my 2006 MacPro 1,1 and your good to go. By the way among the many advantages of using this method is also the fact that your eventual OS X 10.8.3 install will fully recognize every single mb of RAM memory that is installed in your machine.

----------

...here is the site: http://www.jabbawok.net/?p=47
 

hackerwayne

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 17, 2012
789
13
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Sorry Wayne I did not intentionally mean to initiate a hackintosh discussion. I was just trying to draw a comparison to installing OS X on unsupported machines and the ease I experienced in doing do on a non-apple computer compared to an actual apple mac.

This is exactly the method we did before MLPF. And no, my method does not require Chameleon. It boots with Apple bootloader.

----------

godzfire

Google: How I installed Mac OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion on my 2006 MacPro 1,1 and your good to go. By the way among the many advantages of using this method is also the fact that your eventual OS X 10.8.3 install will fully recognize every single mb of RAM memory that is installed in your machine.

----------

...here is the site: http://www.jabbawok.net/?p=47

Don't recommend you to use that way, this method requires Chameleon. Ill find a old copy of my guide for those with Mac Pros. Slightly different method and does not require Chameleon.
 

robi62

macrumors member
Apr 29, 2013
35
0
Spain
@tpho
Yes those are my specs
Lion fully qe/ci quick
Are you sure you are running 32bits???
Orherwise kernel will run 64bits
I have a line saying arch=i386 otherwise will boot 64 in my boot.plist
 

mishendr

macrumors member
Apr 20, 2009
81
1
Bluetooth buggy for me in v0.2.2 can install my bluetooth headset (BH-305) but it wont work (no sound cant/turn up volume)
worked before in v0.2 please can someone provide a fix

You are being very rude, to ask for help this way. Stick to forum rules/etiquete please. Don't use bold/big fonts. You're not the only one out there. :mad:
 

hackerwayne

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 17, 2012
789
13
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Im only seeing one file and four folders on the install partitions after erasing it and re running it

Only 363MBs used on install partition after running MLPostFactor, partition has 8GB limit so not sure why that's messing up

Your app is corrupted.

----------

Is the disk utility permissions repair problem fixed in 0.3 or already fixed?

Fixed in 0.3.
 

Doritez

macrumors member
Mar 16, 2013
38
0
You are being very rude, to ask for help this way. Stick to forum rules/etiquete please. Don't use bold/big fonts. You're not the only one out there. :mad:
I was only trying to report a bug in the forum stating specifically about MLPF Bluetooth to the creators and to get someone with similar problem to agree or to help me fix this issue. The reason for the bold font is not to hog all the attention or in the slightest way of being rude but because this is the fifth time I've posted about this issue with no response. Apologies if i have offended you or any other members here.
 
Last edited:

tpho

macrumors newbie
Aug 6, 2012
20
0
@tpho
Yes those are my specs
Lion fully qe/ci quick
Are you sure you are running 32bits???
Orherwise kernel will run 64bits
I have a line saying arch=i386 otherwise will boot 64 in my boot.plist

Typing 'uname -a' in the console shows that my kernel is running in 32bit. :confused:
 

godzfire

macrumors regular
May 20, 2013
108
16
This is exactly the method we did before MLPF. And no, my method does not require Chameleon. It boots with Apple bootloader.

----------

Don't recommend you to use that way, this method requires Chameleon. Ill find a old copy of my guide for those with Mac Pros. Slightly different method and does not require Chameleon.

I would be in your debt if you could post that for us Mac Pro peeps.
 

gpatpandp

macrumors 6502
Aug 16, 2010
309
11
http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/18/install-os-x-mountain-lion-developer-preview-on-old-unsupported-macs/

...I do not believe this is the method written by Wayne. It appears to be a early method that utilized the initial Mountain Lion Developer Preview release which happen to contain the 32 bit mac_kernel which apple later removed when they made public the final version of OS X 10.8.

Godzfire

I take it you have at least reviewed the link I provided. I am curious about your apparent reluctancy in pursuing it as a potential alternative for yourself. If you have any questions, feel free to ask or you can post any comments and/or concerns may have on the forum. The moderator is very pleasant and ultra prompt in replying back.

At any rate, all the best in getting your Mac Pro up and running in OS X 10.8.3. I can attest to the fact that of all of apple's line of unsupported Macs, the Mac Pro is by far the machine that most benefits from Mountain Lions full functional capabilities.
 

indiecraig

macrumors member
Jan 25, 2008
93
38
I followed this last year before MLpostfactor, deciding that I was better off sticking with Lion. I have a GMA X3100 MacBook, and I'm really impressed with the progress that's been made. Aside from the occasional bug it works perfectly, and most fixes are said to be coming in 0.3.

With 0.3 on the horizon, I'm reluctant to "commit" to my installation that uses 0.2.2. Is there any more information on when 0.3 will be released, or should I just keep checking daily and crossing my fingers?

Thanks for all your hard work, you just might give my laptop another year or two!
 

hack4rmwin

macrumors newbie
Jan 16, 2013
9
0
Support ML

hi guys just a query if this guide works with hackintosh and has fully QC/QI support on x3100.

thx
 

hackerwayne

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 17, 2012
789
13
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
http://osxdaily.com/2012/02/18/install-os-x-mountain-lion-developer-preview-on-old-unsupported-macs/

...I do not believe this is the method written by Wayne. It appears to be a early method that utilized the initial Mountain Lion Developer Preview release which happen to contain the 32 bit mac_kernel which apple later removed when they made public the final version of OS X 10.8.

Godzfire

I take it you have at least reviewed the link I provided. I am curious about your apparent reluctancy in pursuing it as a potential alternative for yourself. If you have any questions, feel free to ask or you can post any comments and/or concerns may have on the forum. The moderator is very pleasant and ultra prompt in replying back.

At any rate, all the best in getting your Mac Pro up and running in OS X 10.8.3. I can attest to the fact that of all of apple's line of unsupported Macs, the Mac Pro is by far the machine that most benefits from Mountain Lions full functional capabilities.

This is written by me, but don't follow it. Its really really outdated. Theres another method in between this and MLPF. Can't seems to find my back up copy anymore.
 

hackerwayne

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Feb 17, 2012
789
13
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.