I needed a bigger screen and more ports, and since I keep my laptops until they become Obsolete, I needed a M1Pro 16 inch. I think a lot of people with pre 2016 15.4 inch laptops have been waiting for this day to arrive.
Well, in that case I need it because I don't want to deal with the jet engine fans of the existing MBP.
It's a 1st world problem I know, but still...
Cant really call it first gen though can you.?Agree, and considering how the MacBook Pro reliability has been shoddy for the last 6 years, I'm reluctant to even consider one of the new Pros. There's just something in my head that's telling me to always avoid the first generation of products.
And Apple will probably still sell it with just 8GB of RAM and 256GB of storage...op wrote:
"Really, think about it, what, aside from creative pros who needs that much power."
In three years, the entry-level MacBook Air will have a CPU as powerful as the M1Pro is today.
That's the way technology goes...
Sounds like a great choice. Did you order 14 or 16''?I haven't owned a computer in over 10 years. I have two firm owned machines (one mac & one pc) in my home office. I decided I wanted to get back to having my own machine as now remote computing is available for work tasks, and I don't like the idea of doing personal things (like posting here) on a work owned machine.
I could probably have gotten away with an M1 Macbook air, but wanted more ram... and why not get the cutting edge performance as this mac will likely need to last me for 6-8 years at least. Went for an M1 Max 10/32 with 32gb ram and 1TB drive. Lowkey regretting not opting for 64gb ram, but I decided to cheap out a bit there. As for the drive, with everything in the cloud now, I have less need for on-device storage. On my work mac I'm only up to 305gb used out of the 512 drive.
Bottom line... I probably don't "need" the M1 Pro or M1 Max, but I WANT it. Let a man have his vices!
14. While home, I have a 49 inch dell monitor to work with so mac will likely remain closed. For travel, I prefer the smaller form-factor.Sounds like a great choice. Did you order 14 or 16''?
On this site, it isn't really about need for most people as it is about desire.
Yea, I get it... It's just that every single word in these prerecorded keynotes has made it through dozens of screenings and edits and is used with absolute particularity. So I believe that the fact that they used "coming back" for one feature and "adding" for others, when all of those features existed previously and all were taken away during the same generational update for ostensibly the same reasons; is a little disingenuous.I'd say that's just standard operating procedure when it comes to any marketing; the conversation here just happens to revolve around Apple because, well, it's MacRumors.
For instance, you don't show a graph where the M1 Max GPU performance falls short of the most powerful discrete mobile GPU in any currently available laptop and say "M1 Max delivers 95% of the performance of the leading discrete mobile GPU". That leaves the viewer thinking they're missing out on something. You don't want that, so you don't advertise in negatives.
Instead you say "M1 Max delivers similar performance while using a 100 watts less power." 'Similar' can mean both "just a bit worse" and "just a bit better" depending on the point you're trying to make, and when qualified with the highlighted power efficiency, the viewer is more likely to be left with a favorable recollection of what was said *
* Does not apply to viewers who are pre-disposed to think negatively about the advertised product or company delivering the message.
I think a lot of people with pre 2016 15.4 inch laptops have been waiting for this day to arrive.
This is most definitely me.I needed a bigger screen and more ports, and since I keep my laptops until they become Obsolete, I needed a M1Pro 16 inch. I think a lot of people with pre 2016 15.4 inch laptops have been waiting for this day to arrive.
My 2012 starting having an issue in mid 2019 where fans would go full speed and everything would crawl to a stop (I believe it could be corrosion from old water damage, but hard to say... I'll likely try to clean up solder points at some point...), and I would have rather gone with a pre-2016 than 15" than any 15" that came thereafter, but thankfully the 16" just came out, with a lot of the issues of 2016-2019 solved (no butterfly keys! physical esc key!). I probably would have either reflowed corroded chips on my 2012 and waited until now to buy a new one had I need been offered a free 16" with i9. The next laptop I buy will most likely be an M-based MBP, but this should last me for many years to come.I needed a bigger screen and more ports, and since I keep my laptops until they become Obsolete, I needed a M1Pro 16 inch. I think a lot of people with pre 2016 15.4 inch laptops have been waiting for this day to arrive.
A lot of people seem to think so. I can recall a conversation with a coworker where I mentioned I was going to pay off my mortgage. His response was that I would lose the tax deduction. My response to that was I would be happy for him to give me a dollar and in return I would give him a quarter. Furthermore I said I would do that for as many dollars as he would be willing to do that with.People say this, "it's a tax write off", as if it means it's free. Do you really think that's how it works?
It's the applications which need the capabilities, not the user. Setting aside the gross inefficiency of today's Internet a lot of people could get by with a 10 - 15 year old computer if their applications didn't need more capable systems.I've been in tech over 30 years myself professionally and honestly, I've heard this same kind of thing repeatedly, down through different eras of tech stretching back even to when I was a kid in the 8 bit era. "Who needs 128K of RAM? 64K is fine" <- I heard someone say that once with regards to the C-128. There's always some truth to it at the time, but, eventually the excess resources get gobbled up by new applications those excess resources enabled and what was once seen as overkill, eventually can't run the new generation of applications.
There's nothing wrong with buying something you want instead of need (assuming you can afford to do so)I don’t, but because I’m stupid and make bad financial decisions I’m gonna buy one.
Exactly. Photoshop 7 on PPC and MacOS 9 is about as usable as current Photoshop CC in M1 mini. Everything you really need for Photo-editing was present in PS7, only opening and saving files to HDD vs SSD is painfully slow. And of course no recent website is viewable under OS9 (you need at least High Sierra I think for comfy browsing)It's the applications which need the capabilities, not the user. Setting aside the gross inefficiency of today's Internet a lot of people could get by with a 10 - 15 year old computer if their applications didn't need more capable systems.
Head on over to the PowerPC forum where users are using systems which are roughly 15 - 20 years old. Using contemporary software for those systems they are quite capable. It's just that the new has consumed more and more with, I would question, somewhat little value in several areas.
IMO no one needs 8K video. Nor do they need 4K video. Am I arguing against these technologies? Certainly not, just stating that for the vast majority they're unneeded.
Love your signature. Did you hear the Faces re-release and bonus song? My vinyl just came in yesterday.But it’s about setting a new standard. We do know what we need until we have it. 4mbps DSL felt amazing after dialup. Now 1 gbps is the standard.