Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Thread title should be the name of this whole forum: IamsomadatApple.com
It's available!

1737571651165.png
 
Apologies if a duplicate...

Why not try H&R? They still run on v12. Not that different than TT, used it a couple of years ago due to great deal on it and only complaint was that a couple of forms took longer to release vs TT.

hr.png

If in a state without state income tax, IRS's free software might be an option.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
My BF is a scientist and uses some software that has not been made compatible with the MacOS version that came with his new MBP. These yearly updates seem to be good for marketing but quite negative for actual professionals running specific software. I understand the software developer should be in charge of updating their software to make it compatible, but it's a hurdle for everyone's workflow.
No, it is not "a hurdle for everyone's workflow." Like you said, "the software developer should be in charge of updating their software" and almost all competent software does get upgraded regularly. Yes there are legacy specialized apps some folks like, but those folks need to build specialty boxes to run their not-maintained-as-current apps and constantly worry about what happens when their not-maintained-as-current app breaks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newton1701
My BF is a scientist and uses some software that has not been made compatible with the MacOS version that came with his new MBP. These yearly updates seem to be good for marketing but quite negative for actual professionals running specific software. I understand the software developer should be in charge of updating their software to make it compatible, but it's a hurdle for everyone's workflow.

Yeah I have the same problem. I have two Macs. One test / one production.

Anything Qt / Wx based which appears to be a lot of mathematical and scientific packages is a ball ache on macOS. But I'm not joking it's 10x worse on windows. Recently windows 11 update completely wiped out about 100 people's CAS software.
 
I have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax. I am sure there are many more programs that will also be impacted. Now before you all get on me about this, realize that with my iMac I got the upgraded video card, have the 3TB Fusion Drive and added 32GB of RAM. I have no idea why this can't be allowed to download the newest OS. After thinking about it, I said, maybe I should just get a mini and use this iMac as a monitor, right? Wrong. Apple had a display port on the 2009-2014 iMacs and then removed it in 2015. My iMac runs perfectly and I just can't believe that with all the "reduce your carbon footprint" stuff that Apple won't even let me use this as a monitor.

Now I'm faced with just putting this in the closet to collect dust. This is such a WASTE.

I understand that Apple tests their new software with older Mac's and can see that the system may run slower or have some risks that we don't know about, but how about let us load it and give us a warning that we acknowledge that we are running it at our own risk? Or how about a version that has some of the features turned off? Or how about just using it as a monitor?

Come on Apple.
i would blame turbotax not apple. apple is letting you run the system you purchased. if you had turbotax running in older os you should ask them to make sure it keeps running in that old version
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newton1701
Yes, but if he could update that iMac to newer macOS- as he can with the OCLP hack- TurboTax would run just fine. Instead, Apple kills support at about the 7 year mark and one has to hack, go Windows or buy a new Mac.

We CAN put some blame towards Intuit for not running on older macOS versions but this could be easily remedied- as proven by OCLP- by Apple tossing the option to users if the want to install new version of macOS on old hardware. However, that's not nearly as profitable as moving them to buy again.
apple offers you free os upgrade on compatible hardware . you are not forced to upgrade hw or os. windows sells you os upgrades
 
Agreed. If the OP bought a Windows machine in 2015 it would have long ago been in the trash.
Have a 2014 PC (4790k, 16 GB, GTX970) and it still works perfectly for daily use, web dev, gaming (even in 4k surprisingly), audio production, professional photography...

My parents have a 2013 HP desktop that's still very fast for the basic things they use it for.

Meanwhile OP's computer, including the whole 5k retina panel that still be considered high-end ten years later, can't run software because of the way Apple updates its OS. Throwing away that display must be the hardest part, especially when Apple charges C$1800 for an almost identical new one.
 
It sounds like using TurboTax has increased your blood pressure! Take it down a notch and just file your taxes by hand. Fill out the PDFs, print them out, and mail them in. Keep on using your 10-year-old Mac! That's what I am doing and I am one happy 🍸😸 And just remember, the tax forms are designed for anyone to be able to fill them in, just like that mac is the computer for the rest of us (_very_ old reference) the tax instructions are for the rest of us too.🍸😹 Get back in touch with your inner accountant! But, um, buy that new mac soon because guess what, the manufacturer does not pay the tariffs. 🍸🙀
 
You have a 10 year old computer bro.

You have had 2 regular computer lifetimes out of it.


To put it in perspective, lets compare a 10 year difference in previous times:

1990: You'd have bought a Mac classic with 68000 @ 8mhz running classic macOS
2000: You'd be looking at an iMac G3, and be able to run OS X on it. You'd have a PowerPC G3 @ 350-500mhz


It's time to upgrade.
Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).

The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement.

My 2014 PC runs all the latest versions of software still, and a much wider array of software than my M4 Mac, that's for sure. OP is talking about tax software which could be made to run on a 486 if they cared to, but a 5k retina iMac is now obsolete for filling in some forms. Maybe they require hardware ray tracing? H265 video encoder? :p
 
Agreed. If the OP bought a Windows machine in 2015 it would have long ago been in the trash.
My 2009 i7 is working fine for my parents. Upgraded the ram to 16gb and slapped in a cheap used Samsung 850 SSD and now it's running windows 11 24H2. My mom watches cooking YouTube channels on it, does her banking and Even works with TurboTax lol!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Snowlover and Altis
Of course we do not (although I do know people who install Windows on brand new MacBooks because they prefer Windows but also prefer Apple hardware) but the point is that there is a simple solution to this specific problem, and that solution is to install Windows.
off topic or maybe not
if that irs tax software made for macs, would windows on a mac still run that specific program?
 
I have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax. I am sure there are many more programs that will also be impacted. Now before you all get on me about this, realize that with my iMac I got the upgraded video card, have the 3TB Fusion Drive and added 32GB of RAM. I have no idea why this can't be allowed to download the newest OS. After thinking about it, I said, maybe I should just get a mini and use this iMac as a monitor, right? Wrong. Apple had a display port on the 2009-2014 iMacs and then removed it in 2015. My iMac runs perfectly and I just can't believe that with all the "reduce your carbon footprint" stuff that Apple won't even let me use this as a monitor.

Now I'm faced with just putting this in the closet to collect dust. This is such a WASTE.

I understand that Apple tests their new software with older Mac's and can see that the system may run slower or have some risks that we don't know about, but how about let us load it and give us a warning that we acknowledge that we are running it at our own risk? Or how about a version that has some of the features turned off? Or how about just using it as a monitor?

Come on Apple.
It’s intel that doesn’t provide security patches anymore for older chipsets Apple can reasonably supply. Anandtech had a great article about this back in the day. No low level hardware safety: literally everything you do on your computer could be at risk. “Running at our own risk” only sounds reasonable when you don’t actually understand the scope of the risks or you fall for the typical “it won’t happen to me” bias that every scam victim fell for.

The reason they’re no longer offered as display is the 5k resolution that couldn’t be put through a single cable with 2015 tech. You might try luna display though.

But to be perfectly honest, being “so mad at apple” for a third party software that no longer supports your decade old computer seems backwards. Apple sold you a computer as a one time purchase that is literally still running strong a decade later. The average wintel machine back then ran for 2 years. Why not be mad at the software provider instead, they stopped supporting your OS when you’re probably still paying them a recurring fee.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Newton1701
Yes, but if he could update that iMac to newer macOS- as he can with the OCLP hack- TurboTax would run just fine. Instead, Apple kills support at about the 7 year mark and one has to hack, go Windows or buy a new Mac.

We CAN put some blame towards Intuit for not running on older macOS versions but this could be easily remedied- as proven by OCLP- by Apple tossing the option to users if the want to install new version of macOS on old hardware. However, that's not nearly as profitable as moving them to buy again.
Apple kills support around the seven year mark because that’s when intel stops all support for their processors. Even scrubbing drivers and support materials. Look for intel “End of Servicing Lifetime” and you can find pdfs about their processor lines and how they stop supporting them.
That Microsoft chooses to expose their older customers to security issues is Microsoft’s choice, but apple choosing not to is a good thing. Not greed.
 
Already happens. Sierra (10.12) turned my mid-2010 MBP into a paperweight years ago. Installing an SSD brought it back, thankfully. But the point is, the computer was fine until the update. Huge mistake.

Edit - Want to hear something else about iPhone updates? My mother’s iPhone 7 Plus battery life did not see a noticeable improvement after replacing the battery at the Apple Store. Seriously. Its percentage was like in the 70’s prior to the replacement. Now it’s at around 100%. Hardly a change in battery life. What does that tell you?
That anecdotes on the internet are just that?
 
I mean, that’s the funny thing. The amount of innovation from 1980 to 1990 was massive, the whole idea of what a computer was changed. From 1990 to 2000, what you could do with a computer completely changed. From 2000 to 2010, massive changes in architecture, power. 2010-2019? The pace slowed significantly, largely due to intel’s slow pace of development. 2020, ok we have apple silicon, which is a major step forward in speed while sacrificing compatibility with legacy and PC software.

There have been massive changes, just (somewhat - the improvements have still been huge!) less so on the performance side, and MUCH more on the integrated security, codec and encryption side. Plus as you say Apple Silicon is an architecture shift (that happened 5 years ago this year).

Nobody is going to carry old hardware forever and that's what a 2015 machine is now: OLD.

I loved my 2015 MacBook Pro too but it had a good run and now is the end of support. Recycle it, move on. Or live within the confines of the last supported OS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Allen_Wentz
Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).

The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement.

My 2014 PC runs all the latest versions of software still, and a much wider array of software than my M4 Mac, that's for sure. OP is talking about tax software which could be made to run on a 486 if they cared to, but a 5k retina iMac is now obsolete for filling in some forms. Maybe they require hardware ray tracing? H265 video encoder? :p

Things have changed, just in different ways.

Your 2014 has unfixable hardware security issues in the CPU that lead to either massive performance problems if fixed in software, or the vulnerability to private key disclosure which is not ideal for your internet banking, web security, encryption, etc.
 
Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).

The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement.

My 2014 PC runs all the latest versions of software still, and a much wider array of software than my M4 Mac, that's for sure. OP is talking about tax software which could be made to run on a 486 if they cared to, but a 5k retina iMac is now obsolete for filling in some forms. Maybe they require hardware ray tracing? H265 video encoder? :p
Are you serious when you say "The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement" ??

Did you miss the fact that Apple now makes its own [impressive] chips that upgrade every year? Or that Apple now uses Unified Memory Architecture [UMA], a huge deal? Or that Apple increased available laptop RAM by 8x in 7 years, facilitating UMA and strongly suggesting increasing RAM demands? Or that Apple's latest chips have compelling ray tracing, etc. in hardware? Or that the world, including Apple, is inserting more and more usage of AI into computing, which puts special demands on hardware? Those are clearly compelling technological advancements.
 
Last edited:
I have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax.
...
Come on Apple.
10 years is ancient from a hardware life perspective.

Your iMac has a 6th gen Intel CPU. If it were a PC, Microsoft would kill support for it on October 25 this year. No Windows 11 without a TPM.

Yes, you can work around the Windows 11 TPM requirement, but you can also work around the Sequoia hardware requirements.

Also, target display mode wasn't a great feature as implemented. All you could send it was specific flavours of mDP (1280x720 and 2560x1440) nothing else -- notably that means no 1080P and no HDMI. There's a reason the Belkin HDMI to target display box existed, but it was $150 and just did 720P from HDMI sources.
 
  • Like
Reactions: throAU
I am so mad at Apple, that I bought two M4 Pro Mac Minis. I guess I just love to hate them.

OP: I remember the 2015 iMacs. They were great computers. OMG, that was 10 years ago! :oops:
 
Are you serious when you say "The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement" ??

Did you miss the fact that Apple now makes its own [impressive] chips that upgrade every year? Or that Apple now uses Unified Memory Architecture [UMA], a huge deal? Or that Apple increased available laptop RAM by 8x in 7 years, facilitating UMA and strongly suggesting increasing RAM demands? Or that Apple's latest chips have compelling ray tracing, etc. in hardware? Or that the world, including Apple, is inserting more and more usage of AI into computing, which puts special demands on hardware? Those are clearly compelling technological advancements.
Wow! Those are all SOOO amazing! I can't wait to see how different MS Office runs on it! Or how quickly websites will load! Those YouTube videos will look unbelievable now!

Wait -- it changes nothing -- not a single thing -- for a large number of users. Increasing RAM demands? I've had 16 GB (plus dedicated 4-8 GB of VRAM) since 2014 (only cost $140 back then even), and Apple only just made 16 GB of shared system and video RAM standard a couple of months ago :p

Do you really think OP needs new hardware to run tax software that a 486 could run? It's a form with basic calculations. In general use, my M4 Mini feels no faster than my 2014 PC (which runs far more software, I might add). Some people just need a computer for the basics and that stuff really hasn't changed. That's why people are unhappy their perfectly functional devices are being declared landfill when we know they're more than up to the jobs being asked of them. This is proven when a simple OCLP makes it run later software fine.
 
Things have changed, just in different ways.

Your 2014 has unfixable hardware security issues in the CPU that lead to either massive performance problems if fixed in software, or the vulnerability to private key disclosure which is not ideal for your internet banking, web security, encryption, etc.
Can you point me to where that's been a widespread problem for consumers? Don't Apple's own M1, M2, and M3 have unpatchable hardware security vulnerabilities?... https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/macbooks/unpatchable-vulnerability-discovered-in-apple-m1-m2-and-m3-chips-what-you-need-to-know

Or iLeakage which affected iOS devices as well as M-series Macs... https://www.tomsguide.com/news/new-...asswords-on-iphones-and-macs-how-to-stay-safe

Seems to be a complete non-issue, almost purely academic, if the users aren't making very poor decisions, as is the case for the all kinds of hardware and software vulnerabilities exist out there.
 
Wow! Those are all SOOO amazing! I can't wait to see how different MS Office runs on it! Or how quickly websites will load! Those YouTube videos will look unbelievable now!

Wait -- it changes nothing -- not a single thing -- for a large number of users. Increasing RAM demands? I've had 16 GB (plus dedicated 4-8 GB of VRAM) since 2014 (only cost $140 back then even), and Apple only just made 16 GB of shared system and video RAM standard a couple of months ago :p

Do you really think OP needs new hardware to run tax software that a 486 could run? It's a form with basic calculations. In general use, my M4 Mini feels no faster than my 2014 PC (which runs far more software, I might add). Some people just need a computer for the basics and that stuff really hasn't changed. That's why people are unhappy their perfectly functional devices are being declared landfill when we know they're more than up to the jobs being asked of them. This is proven when a simple OCLP makes it run later software fine.
Sure mundane computing does not need new hardware: anyone can keep their 10-year-old box and 10-year-old OS and 10-year-old app and just compute away.

But like I said, the things I listed [that you foolishly denigrate] are clearly compelling technological advancements. There are many, many other technological advancements also happening; I only listed a few. The tech world advances, and hiding one's head in the sand does not stop it advancing. So feel free to stick with your "10 years old is fine" mentality, but I suggest that y'all keep all components of that 10-year-old plan off the internet, because the bad actors will not also be hiding their heads in the sand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Placing the blame on Apple when it's Intuit who came up with those system requirements.

H&R Block requires macOS 12 or higher and can be purchased for half (or less) of the price of TurboTax.

This.

It's on Intuit to adapt to our Systems; not for The System to adapt.

I have been {reasonably} satisfied with HRB for the duration, but I always interface via HTTP.

It's not necessary to purchase an App for these things.

Gowan, and give a try to alternative interface, Mikebike125 ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jumpthesnark
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.