It's available!Thread title should be the name of this whole forum: IamsomadatApple.com
It's available!Thread title should be the name of this whole forum: IamsomadatApple.com
No, it is not "a hurdle for everyone's workflow." Like you said, "the software developer should be in charge of updating their software" and almost all competent software does get upgraded regularly. Yes there are legacy specialized apps some folks like, but those folks need to build specialty boxes to run their not-maintained-as-current apps and constantly worry about what happens when their not-maintained-as-current app breaks.My BF is a scientist and uses some software that has not been made compatible with the MacOS version that came with his new MBP. These yearly updates seem to be good for marketing but quite negative for actual professionals running specific software. I understand the software developer should be in charge of updating their software to make it compatible, but it's a hurdle for everyone's workflow.
My BF is a scientist and uses some software that has not been made compatible with the MacOS version that came with his new MBP. These yearly updates seem to be good for marketing but quite negative for actual professionals running specific software. I understand the software developer should be in charge of updating their software to make it compatible, but it's a hurdle for everyone's workflow.
i would blame turbotax not apple. apple is letting you run the system you purchased. if you had turbotax running in older os you should ask them to make sure it keeps running in that old versionI have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax. I am sure there are many more programs that will also be impacted. Now before you all get on me about this, realize that with my iMac I got the upgraded video card, have the 3TB Fusion Drive and added 32GB of RAM. I have no idea why this can't be allowed to download the newest OS. After thinking about it, I said, maybe I should just get a mini and use this iMac as a monitor, right? Wrong. Apple had a display port on the 2009-2014 iMacs and then removed it in 2015. My iMac runs perfectly and I just can't believe that with all the "reduce your carbon footprint" stuff that Apple won't even let me use this as a monitor.
Now I'm faced with just putting this in the closet to collect dust. This is such a WASTE.
I understand that Apple tests their new software with older Mac's and can see that the system may run slower or have some risks that we don't know about, but how about let us load it and give us a warning that we acknowledge that we are running it at our own risk? Or how about a version that has some of the features turned off? Or how about just using it as a monitor?
Come on Apple.
technically, Mountain Lion is not ancient technology, just a much better OS than Monterey.Well, I guess that conclusively proves that ancient technology is better than current technology 🤣.
Good luck with that.
apple offers you free os upgrade on compatible hardware . you are not forced to upgrade hw or os. windows sells you os upgradesYes, but if he could update that iMac to newer macOS- as he can with the OCLP hack- TurboTax would run just fine. Instead, Apple kills support at about the 7 year mark and one has to hack, go Windows or buy a new Mac.
We CAN put some blame towards Intuit for not running on older macOS versions but this could be easily remedied- as proven by OCLP- by Apple tossing the option to users if the want to install new version of macOS on old hardware. However, that's not nearly as profitable as moving them to buy again.
Have a 2014 PC (4790k, 16 GB, GTX970) and it still works perfectly for daily use, web dev, gaming (even in 4k surprisingly), audio production, professional photography...Agreed. If the OP bought a Windows machine in 2015 it would have long ago been in the trash.
Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).You have a 10 year old computer bro.
You have had 2 regular computer lifetimes out of it.
To put it in perspective, lets compare a 10 year difference in previous times:
1990: You'd have bought a Mac classic with 68000 @ 8mhz running classic macOS
2000: You'd be looking at an iMac G3, and be able to run OS X on it. You'd have a PowerPC G3 @ 350-500mhz
It's time to upgrade.
My 2009 i7 is working fine for my parents. Upgraded the ram to 16gb and slapped in a cheap used Samsung 850 SSD and now it's running windows 11 24H2. My mom watches cooking YouTube channels on it, does her banking and Even works with TurboTax lol!Agreed. If the OP bought a Windows machine in 2015 it would have long ago been in the trash.
Of course we do not (although I do know people who install Windows on brand new MacBooks because they prefer Windows but also prefer Apple hardware) but the point is that there is a simple solution to this specific problem, and that solution is to install Windows.Yes we definitely buy Macs to be forced to run windows
off topic or maybe notOf course we do not (although I do know people who install Windows on brand new MacBooks because they prefer Windows but also prefer Apple hardware) but the point is that there is a simple solution to this specific problem, and that solution is to install Windows.
It’s intel that doesn’t provide security patches anymore for older chipsets Apple can reasonably supply. Anandtech had a great article about this back in the day. No low level hardware safety: literally everything you do on your computer could be at risk. “Running at our own risk” only sounds reasonable when you don’t actually understand the scope of the risks or you fall for the typical “it won’t happen to me” bias that every scam victim fell for.I have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax. I am sure there are many more programs that will also be impacted. Now before you all get on me about this, realize that with my iMac I got the upgraded video card, have the 3TB Fusion Drive and added 32GB of RAM. I have no idea why this can't be allowed to download the newest OS. After thinking about it, I said, maybe I should just get a mini and use this iMac as a monitor, right? Wrong. Apple had a display port on the 2009-2014 iMacs and then removed it in 2015. My iMac runs perfectly and I just can't believe that with all the "reduce your carbon footprint" stuff that Apple won't even let me use this as a monitor.
Now I'm faced with just putting this in the closet to collect dust. This is such a WASTE.
I understand that Apple tests their new software with older Mac's and can see that the system may run slower or have some risks that we don't know about, but how about let us load it and give us a warning that we acknowledge that we are running it at our own risk? Or how about a version that has some of the features turned off? Or how about just using it as a monitor?
Come on Apple.
Apple kills support around the seven year mark because that’s when intel stops all support for their processors. Even scrubbing drivers and support materials. Look for intel “End of Servicing Lifetime” and you can find pdfs about their processor lines and how they stop supporting them.Yes, but if he could update that iMac to newer macOS- as he can with the OCLP hack- TurboTax would run just fine. Instead, Apple kills support at about the 7 year mark and one has to hack, go Windows or buy a new Mac.
We CAN put some blame towards Intuit for not running on older macOS versions but this could be easily remedied- as proven by OCLP- by Apple tossing the option to users if the want to install new version of macOS on old hardware. However, that's not nearly as profitable as moving them to buy again.
That anecdotes on the internet are just that?Already happens. Sierra (10.12) turned my mid-2010 MBP into a paperweight years ago. Installing an SSD brought it back, thankfully. But the point is, the computer was fine until the update. Huge mistake.
Edit - Want to hear something else about iPhone updates? My mother’s iPhone 7 Plus battery life did not see a noticeable improvement after replacing the battery at the Apple Store. Seriously. Its percentage was like in the 70’s prior to the replacement. Now it’s at around 100%. Hardly a change in battery life. What does that tell you?
I mean, that’s the funny thing. The amount of innovation from 1980 to 1990 was massive, the whole idea of what a computer was changed. From 1990 to 2000, what you could do with a computer completely changed. From 2000 to 2010, massive changes in architecture, power. 2010-2019? The pace slowed significantly, largely due to intel’s slow pace of development. 2020, ok we have apple silicon, which is a major step forward in speed while sacrificing compatibility with legacy and PC software.
Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).
The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement.
My 2014 PC runs all the latest versions of software still, and a much wider array of software than my M4 Mac, that's for sure. OP is talking about tax software which could be made to run on a 486 if they cared to, but a 5k retina iMac is now obsolete for filling in some forms. Maybe they require hardware ray tracing? H265 video encoder?![]()
Are you serious when you say "The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement" ??Things changed fast in the 90s. Things are barely changing at all now, and often just for the sake of it ($$$).
The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement.
My 2014 PC runs all the latest versions of software still, and a much wider array of software than my M4 Mac, that's for sure. OP is talking about tax software which could be made to run on a 486 if they cared to, but a 5k retina iMac is now obsolete for filling in some forms. Maybe they require hardware ray tracing? H265 video encoder?![]()
10 years is ancient from a hardware life perspective.I have a Late 2015 27" iMac and just found out that because Apple won't let it upgrade to OSX 13 that I cannot run the current version of TurboTax.
...
Come on Apple.
Wow! Those are all SOOO amazing! I can't wait to see how different MS Office runs on it! Or how quickly websites will load! Those YouTube videos will look unbelievable now!Are you serious when you say "The only reason it's "time to upgrade" is by assertion, not by some compelling technological advancement" ??
Did you miss the fact that Apple now makes its own [impressive] chips that upgrade every year? Or that Apple now uses Unified Memory Architecture [UMA], a huge deal? Or that Apple increased available laptop RAM by 8x in 7 years, facilitating UMA and strongly suggesting increasing RAM demands? Or that Apple's latest chips have compelling ray tracing, etc. in hardware? Or that the world, including Apple, is inserting more and more usage of AI into computing, which puts special demands on hardware? Those are clearly compelling technological advancements.
Can you point me to where that's been a widespread problem for consumers? Don't Apple's own M1, M2, and M3 have unpatchable hardware security vulnerabilities?... https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/macbooks/unpatchable-vulnerability-discovered-in-apple-m1-m2-and-m3-chips-what-you-need-to-knowThings have changed, just in different ways.
Your 2014 has unfixable hardware security issues in the CPU that lead to either massive performance problems if fixed in software, or the vulnerability to private key disclosure which is not ideal for your internet banking, web security, encryption, etc.
Sure mundane computing does not need new hardware: anyone can keep their 10-year-old box and 10-year-old OS and 10-year-old app and just compute away.Wow! Those are all SOOO amazing! I can't wait to see how different MS Office runs on it! Or how quickly websites will load! Those YouTube videos will look unbelievable now!
Wait -- it changes nothing -- not a single thing -- for a large number of users. Increasing RAM demands? I've had 16 GB (plus dedicated 4-8 GB of VRAM) since 2014 (only cost $140 back then even), and Apple only just made 16 GB of shared system and video RAM standard a couple of months ago
Do you really think OP needs new hardware to run tax software that a 486 could run? It's a form with basic calculations. In general use, my M4 Mini feels no faster than my 2014 PC (which runs far more software, I might add). Some people just need a computer for the basics and that stuff really hasn't changed. That's why people are unhappy their perfectly functional devices are being declared landfill when we know they're more than up to the jobs being asked of them. This is proven when a simple OCLP makes it run later software fine.
Placing the blame on Apple when it's Intuit who came up with those system requirements.
H&R Block requires macOS 12 or higher and can be purchased for half (or less) of the price of TurboTax.