No a lot of what you are saying is not true. Unless you are mentally challenged or not able to use the internet properly anyone can import a phone that easily without any problems. You only need to visit some resellers websites and buy one. Since this phone support all US and Europe bands you still could use it on any provider and it will work the same..
Why would anyone go to the lengths to try to import a phone from China and then have it ported over to some US reseller not knowing the support? Isn’t the topic on the iPhone X?
Also, I think Its clear you did not read what the OP stated. They’re not interested in android and prefer iOS. And that phone is not available or for sale in the United States, it’s for sale in China. Why would that be a direct result of somebody wanting an android device when they prefer iOS? Perhaps read the prior post(s) before insinuating otherwise.
Secondly we are not talking about the difference's between 2D versus 3D facial mapping. It's a bout the biometric differences between those two.
Re-read what you wrote here. It doesn’t make any sense. You’re saying that we’re not talking about the difference between 2-D and 3-D facial mapping, but yet you’re saying it’s about the biometric differences between those two. They’re very much different in the sense of how they provide a stricter regulation of security with 3D facial mapping.
Studies are showing that fingerprintmapping is currently still more secure than facial mapping. .
What does this even mean? Are you referring to fingerprint mapping under the display or fingerprint mapping in general? Do you have a link to those studies that are proving that fingerprint mapping is currently more secure than facial mapping under the display? More specifically, more secure than 3-D facial mapping?
When You provide any links, could you make sure that it actually indicates the studies that are shown that finger print mapping under the display is more secure than 3-D facial mapping with Face ID?
Also it's a myth to think that the working process of an under display fingerprint reader gets affected by using a screenprotector..
This Also doesn’t make any sense, how can it be a ‘myth’ if smart phone providers aren’t even utilizing this technology with some of the major smart phone manufacturers?
Also, If that’s your claim, then why was it rumored that Samsung was struggling to implement a fingerprint sensor under the display for the Note 9, Which was rumored by Ming Kuo.
https://www.macrumors.com/2018/03/09/samsung-screen-fingerprint-sensor-galaxy-note-9/amp/
You are just finding excuses to protect your Apple product. Which more people seems to suffer from in this topic.
This is incorrect. I Never even commented which Apple products I own, I simply iterated that you’re for posting false equivalency‘s and suggesting a phone that’s not even available in United States for resale. Not to mention, if you read anything of the prior posts in this thread, you would understand that iOS was the preference by the OP, _not_ android.
And at last the speed of those two different ways of unlocking the phone have been tested by a Dutch website. Result, it's faster than facial recognition (with the even slower under display scanner of the X21 which got upgraded on the Nex with 10% more speed).
https://tweakers.net/reviews/6259/2...achter-het-scherm-gebruik-in-de-praktijk.html
Let me try to understand this, you posted some random link from a Dutch website comparing two different ways of unlocking the phone tested based on what exactly? What are they testing against? It’s two *different* types of biometric security. Does it really make a difference if it’s a mere second or two faster.
Not to mention, how could anybody validate that “test” when others don’t even have access to the Vivo Nex? You Keep advocating this smart phone as if it’s some option, when it’s not for majority.