My first machine was a home built ZX81
no wonder you are salty.
My first machine was a home built ZX81
Sweet! In '75, I wanted to get an Altair but it cost the equivalent of $3100. Had to satisfy myself using my buddies'. Tried out Altair BASIC from some liitle company calling itself Micro-Soft, started by a couple of local weirdos here in Seattle. Seemed primitive compared to the mainframes I was working on at the time ...My first machine was a home built ZX81
Unfortunately some customers seem to have to learn this the hard way, instead of just understanding it from the get go.The ipad is “pro” only in relative terms… the ipad pro is still an ipad.
You don't seem to be able to think bigger than what's in front of you right now. Which is to say that the iPad could have, and was supposed to be, so much more. At first glance, people were right, it was an oversized iPod touch in terms of hardware. I believe Jobs and Forstall wanted it to differentiate it with software and that's why they kept saying it was "magical" and showing stargazing apps. But that never came to be for reasons we're all well aware of, and the current crop of leadership is too unimaginative to do anything about it. Extremely tragic given the hopes they (probably) had for a tablet device when they started the exercise back in 2001/2002, back when they said "lets show them how it's done" in response to the windows xp on tablet stuff.You do realize that what MOST folks need a computer for, email, web browsing, editing photos… those tasks can be done on an iPad. That there’s a few thousand folks that specifically want FCP doesn’t matter in the big picture, there are folks buying iPads everyday that are now out of the Mac market.
Sure, there are folks that will never “get” touch interfaces and will always buy systems that match the computer experience they’re most accustomed to. But, for those that have never used a Mac (most of the world) an iPad does what they need a computer to do.
Unlike the OP, I value making decisions on the reality that exists now rather than the fantasy of what some folks think will be. I bought an iPad Pro for what I use it for, not because I was CERTAIN that FCP and Logic Pro were on the way. Many millions of people are buying and enjoying the iPad for what it does. If in the future, some new features make what some people wish for REAL, those folks will enjoy that, too. Or, likely not, as the iPad already does what they need it to do.You don't seem to be able to think bigger than what's in front of you right now. Which is to say that the iPad could have, and was supposed to be, so much more.
Someone that, in 2011, was computing on an iMac and a MacBook Air is now computing on a Mac again? That’s not surprising, that’s expected. And, from reading the story, a part of that was just wanting to stay relevant as a writer. He says, “I don’t want to look back at MacStories in 10 years and regret I didn’t at least try macOS again.” When your relevance plays a lot into your livelihood, (and Apple’s offering a free Mac ) it would be silly NOT to ride the wave of the Apple Silicon Macs. He made money being the iPad-fanboy guy, I’m sure he’ll also make money being the ex-iPad-Mac-fanboy guy. I’m sure links to his story are making the rounds and will net him a lot of eyes (and maybe new subscribers). Which is perfectly fine.And the funny thing is that replace-your-mac-with-an-ipad-fanboy-number-1 vittichi just admitted that he has been using a MacBook Pro to do all of this for the last six months, and found it to be really great.
Not if one actually reads the story, he’s quite a bit more than just a blogger.Hard to imagine a blogger needing much more than any of those tools you outlined, so why would he switch to a Mac?
Well, to answer your question, no it doesn’t fulfill my needs now. But that’s not a hardware limitation. That a a deliberate software limitation. It’s wild that those of us who think the iPad is capable of much more, with relative easy software fixes are perceived as unreasonable because we have frustrations about the device’s obvious software shortcomings. It’s also wild that a $2400 piece of hardware isn’t capable of anymore than a $329 piece of hardware, from the same company.
If Apple releases FC you're still going to find something to "close the book over"; whether its external monitor support or needing another app/plugin. Just stick with your MacBook for video work.If we don't get Final Cut for the M1 iPad Pro at WWDC, I am closing the book on this experiment.
so to be clear… people still use FCP?If we don't get Final Cut for the M1 iPad Pro at WWDC, I am closing the book on this experiment. I do not need an M1 to read comic books and magazines or run lowend apps that are fine on the iPhone. The $300 iPad will suffice. The iPad "Pro" will have been a failed opportunity with no pro apps. I would never recommend an iPad Pro over the M1 Macbook Air. Apple has even lost Vitticci at this point, which is amazing.
The same way a 20k Mac Pro isn’t capable of any more than a $700 Mac Mini? In theory, of course, but that’s also the case with iPads.
I can save, copy, delete files in both list view and icon view. What is it that people want in “file management”? I mean, I do appreciate that folks have stopped saying that it should have a file system as it’s had one of those since the beginning.File management on iPad is a prank
Yes a lot people do.so to be clear… people still use FCP?
I can save, copy, delete files in both list view and icon view. What is it that people want in “file management”? I mean, I do appreciate that folks have stopped saying that it should have a file system as it’s had one of those since the beginning.
Oh boy, here's another one with an iPad Pro expecting it to be a full laptop/ computer replacement.If we don't get Final Cut for the M1 iPad Pro at WWDC, I am closing the book on this experiment. I do not need an M1 to read comic books and magazines or run lowend apps that are fine on the iPhone. The $300 iPad will suffice. The iPad "Pro" will have been a failed opportunity with no pro apps. I would never recommend an iPad Pro over the M1 Macbook Air. Apple has even lost Vitticci at this point, which is amazing.
While I agree with your comments across this thread, I do think it isn't quite fair to bring up the Chromebook since people pay a few hundred dollars for that, not $1000-$2400. The problem with the iPad Pro lineup is they aren't anymore capable than the $329 iPad. The people who buy a base iPad get the exact same experience just about across the board as the people who paid $2400 for the 2TB iPad Pro. Apple throwing in such incredible hardware in a 12.9" tablet with 16GB of RAM and 2TB of storage just to have a very restrictive and unintuitive software that is the current iPadOS is where much of the frustration lies. No ability to use proper external monitor support. A fairly weak Files app that doesn't give proper file management. No ability to open multiple apps in an intuitive way (floating windows style). A thunderbolt port less capable than the MacBook Air with the same processor. These are all areas that are low hanging fruit and yet Apple wants to convince us to spend up on the Pro models...for what? Those are features that could be added to the OS while still retaining the unique ability to use an Apple Pencil with a touch screen device. The Pro models feels very much held back intentionally when the hardware is quite literally on par with the new MacBook Pros, and every bit as capable from a processing perspective as the the M1 MacBook Air and Pro. The hard part is done-the hardware. Now fix the software to utilize the hardware.
It’s not that the OS doesn’t have file management, just that certain edge cases are buggy and I can totally see that. Pedantic, yes, but thanks for the clarification as I appreciate understanding these things.Perhaps not corrupting files on external drives and not failing on large file transfers.
That's what I like about the iPad - that it doesn't try too hard to emulate a PC, and I for one hope it stays that way.The ipad is “pro” only in relative terms… the ipad pro is still an ipad.
What you described is not a lack of file management.Perhaps not corrupting files on external drives and not failing on large file transfers.
Just like the pro on any computer, they all still do the same, the “pro” ones just do it faster.Unfortunately some customers seem to have to learn this the hard way, instead of just understanding it from the get go.
The iPad will AWLAYS just be the iPad.
I think it’s possible to do all of your video editing on an iPad Pro with Lumafusion. One of my favorite iPad-centric content channels on YouTube is produced all on an iPad Pro and has been for years.If Apple releases FC you're still going to find something to "close the book over"; whether its external monitor support or needing another app/plugin. Just stick with your MacBook for video work.