It’s in 11.3, which Apple said will be out this spring.When will the update with the battery health info be out? March or April?
So is spring considered April then? Just curious.It’s in 11.3, which Apple said will be out this spring.
So is spring considered April then? Just curious.
Not before sometime in (mid-late) March, but can be in April, and perhaps even May, if not June, although that's less likely.So is spring considered April then? Just curious.
It's not worth it to me to download the beta because I'm a noob to iOS, but I really want to see battery data.Not before sometime in (mid-late) March, but can be in April, and perhaps even May, if not June, although that's less likely.
If you have a Mac...http://www.coconut-flavour.com/coconutbattery/It's not worth it to me to download the beta because I'm a noob to iOS, but I really want to see battery data.
It will be clearly be this week, today or tomorrow is more likely
You're really not missing much as it is now. I agree that displaying a cycle count would make it a little more useful.It's not worth it to me to download the beta because I'm a noob to iOS, but I really want to see battery data.
I agree that displaying a cycle count would make it a little more useful.
Could tell if level of wear was typical for that cycle number or notHow?
Why does that matter? Yes the battery is rated for 80% @ 500 cycles, but I have had batteries hit 500 cycles and still be at 95%. The only number that really matters is health.Could tell if level of wear was typical for that cycle number or not
I disagree. Think about it like a car, where the wear percentage can be compared to the overall look of the car (rust, paint chips, etc.) and the cycle count can be compared to the the number of miles on the car. Just because a car is rust free and appears to be in decent shape, doesn't make the fact that it has 150,000 miles on it irrelevant.Why does that matter? Yes the battery is rated for 80% @ 500 cycles, but I have had batteries hit 500 cycles and still be at 95%. The only number that really matters is health.
I understand where you are going with the analogy but I find it inconsistent. While cycle count may be related to the miles of the vehicle, health is not related to the cosmetics. Health would be related to the pistons, wear on the axels or wear on the transmission. Health and cycle are related. As are mileage and wear of components. Paint chips and rust has nothing to do with the operation of the vehicle.I disagree. Think about it like a car, where the wear percentage can be compared to the overall look of the car (rust, paint chips, etc.) and the cycle count can be compared to the the number of miles on the car. Just because a car is rust free and appears to be in decent shape, doesn't make the fact that it has 150,000 miles on it irrelevant.
@Madscotsman is it today? (11.3 b3)