So fast! It will be here with all kinds of surprises. Genmoji and Image Playground for @Ansath 😂, and all the battery drain issues and keyboard lag fixes for the rest of us. 🥳Yep the day isn’t over, one beta came around 10pm in the evening in July, so keep your faith up! And if not, tomorrow comes faster than you can imagine 😉
So fast! It will be here with all kinds of surprises. Genmoji and Image Playground for @Ansath 😂, and all the battery drain issues and keyboard lag fixes for the rest of us.
Got them both crossed 🤞🤞, and my tinfoil hat on too.Fingers crossed
Still 2 hrs left for a potential beta drop ! I will reload the settings app in 2 hrsLooking like tomorrow now... bummer, I was really hoping for beta 7 to drop today
Gotcha. I was confused a bit because the way their posts are worded makes it seem very matter-of-fact like they know for sure and not speculation or opinion…. Thought perhaps I had missed somethingThey are “speculating” based on zero information from Apple.
Will the beta be for both the public and developer version? I'm on the developer version now, and might try the public version of its possible
Thanks a lot 🙂. Didn't get any of the AI tools on Norway, although I tried switching to US location. My battery is pretty interesting though, so looking forward to try the new beta 🙂For 18.0? It will be the developer beta followed a few hours later by the public beta. But there is no point in switching between them because they’ll be identical.
For 18.1, presumably it will be only the developer beta as there has not been a public beta released as yet.
So I am just curious what features of Gemini put any pressure on Apple? Seems the media that covered the event were not extremely impressed. The photo stuff is about it, nothing there is something to push Apple to release Genmoji and Image Playground or even AI Siri any sooner.Apple absolutely HAS to get this stuff out. Google’s release last week of additional features on the Pixel only amplified that. That is the driver here.
In your opinion, that is. I disagree with you.So I am just curious what features of Gemini put any pressure on Apple? Seems the media that covered the event were not extremely impressed. The photo stuff is about it, nothing there is something to push Apple to release Genmoji and Image Playground or even AI Siri any sooner.
Cool? I think I was quoting and asking @gwhizkids his opinion since he brought it.In your opinion, that is. I disagree with you.
Plus we still don’t definitively know what else is coming with 18.1. Could be more than we currently have in beta 2.
It’s a public forum, so others can chip in and disagree with you, it wasn’t a private chat.Cool? I think I was quoting and asking @gwhizkids his opinion since he brought it.
Last time I checked this the iOS 18 speculation thread, not the iOS 18 Apple confirmed thread. I am under the assumption everything here is someone's opinion as you should as well.
Now that there is some clarification for you, you can disagree as you like. Everyone here has opinions. I for one don't think Google is doing anything amazing. Are they ahead in AI, but they have been ahead of Apple in features for years. It's about making it better for Apple. So rushing now seems rather pointless. They aren't releasing the iPhone 16s with AI, so rushing now only creates a worse product down the road if they are use AI as the main selling point of the 16s.
I think you are misunderstanding me: Of course, Apple didn't start jumping up and down following last week's Pixel event. What I am saying is that it’s been obvious for a while now that Apple is not at the vanguard of the development of AI tools on phones. The Pixel event just served to reinforce that idea. Now, not being at the forefront of a new technology may not be objectively a bad thing, as Apple usually takes features developed first on other platforms and makes them uniquely Apple, frequently more successfully than the originator. But here, Wall Street has gotten involved and has decided that AI is the "next big thing" and that it would punish companies that were not embracing it sufficiently. Apple was one such company until June.So I am just curious what features of Gemini put any pressure on Apple? Seems the media that covered the event were not extremely impressed. The photo stuff is about it, nothing there is something to push Apple to release Genmoji and Image Playground or even AI Siri any sooner.
Various reports and ex-employees pretty much confirmed that AI is a kneejerk reaction by Apple, as evident by the lackluster launch scope. They got caught cold by ChatGPT and co. and have been scrambling to produce something that competes.It’s a public forum, so others can chip in and disagree with you, it wasn’t a private chat.
Additionally, you have stated matter of factly that genmoji & image playground are not coming in 18.1, rather than speculatively stating it - which was why I made a point of picking you up on it.
Additionally, you know Apple has been working on AI for at least a couple of years, so they’re not ‘rushing’ it. The way you talk about it, you’d think they only started on it 3 months ago. 🫠
Anyone can disagree with whoever they like. I didn't suggest it wasn't a public forum. Moving on.It’s a public forum, so others can chip in and disagree with you, it wasn’t a private chat.
Additionally, you have stated matter of factly that genmoji & image playground are not coming in 18.1, rather than speculatively stating it - which was why I made a point of picking you up on it.
Additionally, you know Apple has been working on AI for at least a couple of years, so they’re not ‘rushing’ it. The way you talk about it, you’d think they only started on it 3 months ago. 🫠
Ok, that is fair enough. I took it as you saying because of what Google put on stage, Apple is gonna have to scramble with AI. I totally agree the heat is on Apple. It's been there. I just dont think Googles event makes Apples AI come out any faster.I think you are misunderstanding me: Of course, Apple didn't start jumping up and down following last week's Pixel event. What I am saying is that it’s been obvious for a while now that Apple is not at the vanguard of the development of AI tools on phones. The Pixel event just served to reinforce that idea. Now, not being at the forefront of a new technology may not be objectively a bad thing, as Apple usually takes features developed first on other platforms and makes them uniquely Apple, frequently more successfully than the originator. But here, Wall Street has gotten involved and has decided that AI is the "next big thing" and that it would punish companies that were not embracing it sufficiently. Apple was one such company until June.
WWDC gave Apple some breathing room. But it has to show progress on getting these features out to market, or Wall Street will turn up the heat again. Given that OpenAI has released ChatGPT 4o and Google has released these new Pixel/Gemini features, Apple is going to really be feeling it, and they know they need to play catch-up.
Yep this is what I am saying. Apple isn't leading the way in AI, and they are going to keep playing catch up on AI.The thing about this discussion of catch up is…when has apple technically been ahead of the curve with tech trends? and why do people insist on having the same conversation over and over for…decades. they follow a cautious monitoring approach almost always. The vision pro might violate that rule in some ways but it clearly was priced to serve as a high end concept, not for the mass consumption market.
The Gemini demo…in what world am I going to be going back and forth with an AI bot to search for travel ideas or trips? Maybe typed out so I can make notes, but their demos really just seem to serve as “demos.“ Apple’s seem “lackluster“ because they are demonstrating some very basic evolutions of what we didn’t refer to as AI before but was clearly AI, like predictive text, mail summarization, etc. But you know what? they’re small adjustments that seem to be useful without forcefeeding excess AI front and center.
Clearly at the WWDC announcing iOS 18 Apple mentioned this:I think you are misunderstanding me: Of course, Apple didn't start jumping up and down following last week's Pixel event. What I am saying is that it’s been obvious for a while now that Apple is not at the vanguard of the development of AI tools on phones. The Pixel event just served to reinforce that idea. Now, not being at the forefront of a new technology may not be objectively a bad thing, as Apple usually takes features developed first on other platforms and makes them uniquely Apple, frequently more successfully than the originator. But here, Wall Street has gotten involved and has decided that AI is the "next big thing" and that it would punish companies that were not embracing it sufficiently. Apple was one such company until June.
WWDC gave Apple some breathing room. But it has to show progress on getting these features out to market, or Wall Street will turn up the heat again. Given that OpenAI has released ChatGPT 4o and Google has released these new Pixel/Gemini features, Apple is going to really be feeling it, and they know they need to play catch-up.
This is exactly right. Apple almost never does anything first; they just do it better (and usually best). They don't go for "sexy" and "sizzle"; they make stuff that makes their users' lives easier. Having a robust development community affords them the ability to do that. Anything Apple doesn't build into the OS can be supplied by developers.The thing about this discussion of catch up is…when has apple technically been ahead of the curve with tech trends? and why do people insist on having the same conversation over and over for…decades. they follow a cautious monitoring approach almost always. The vision pro might violate that rule in some ways but it clearly was priced to serve as a high end concept, not for the mass consumption market.
The Gemini demo…in what world am I going to be going back and forth with an AI bot to search for travel ideas or trips? Maybe typed out so I can make notes, but their demos really just seem to serve as “demos.“ Apple’s seem “lackluster“ because they are demonstrating some very basic evolutions of what we didn’t refer to as AI before but was clearly AI, like predictive text, mail summarization, etc. But you know what? they’re small adjustments that seem to be useful without forcefeeding excess AI front and center.