But easier by comparison still doesn’t give the whole story neither does it provide a story that would be of most use for users. For example, say you secured both iPads to a table and loaded them both progressively with weight... if the old one bends at 60 lbs, but the new one bends at 45 pounds, folks would be able to say, ”Yeah, it’s ’weaker’, but I don’t intend to carry 45 pounds of weight on mine, so I’m good.” Even better, if it was found that the new iPad can only carry a half pound of weight before bending, then THAT would show a clearly deficient design. I’m not interested in running the test myself because I’m not having a problem. But, it seems surprising that one of the “destroy iPads” channels haven’t picked up on that angle. Guess there’s only so much money in destroying iPadsits much EASIER to bend iPad Pro current gen compared to the one that was in the old form.
And, it could be that the increased load on the old one could be due to our structural friend, the arc since the back is curved. Additionally, there are far fewer edges on the old iPad to visually detect a bend in the first place. It could be that they both have the same problem, one just makes it far easier to see.
It is most definitely a problem for some people and absolutely a concern when spending that much money. But, there’s zero scientific information out there for anyone to make an informed decision on BEFORE purchase. (Maybe 5.9mm thin straight sided device that’s 11 inches long will ALWAYS bend easier than a curved sided Air 3?)