a) It is still against the law to lock GSM"s in Belgium
b) The law was changed in May to allow cross-subsidisation of certain ranges of devices, including GSM handsets
c) The rationale behind this law is to push further the penetration of technology to the populations
d) Previously the operators have been forbidden by Belgian law to sell any products below cost price -> hence the higher end handsets remain out of most people's acceptable price bracket
e) Low end 3G's do not encourage use - compare the experience on a standard Nokia handset with Vodafone Live versus an iPhone, right, there is no comparison, one sucks the other does its job
f) Experience on the switch from a non-subsidised to subsidised market in Finland (same as what Belgium is about to go through) showed that locking of devices is counter-productive
g) Experience on the French market is that locking drives down sales
h) The operators don't want subidisation, the handset manufacturers do
i) No operator in Belgium is ready yet to bring offers to market, what we see right now is the indirect sales (like Phone House) doing some Mickey-Mouse offers
j) People think that getting an iPhone for free and a locked-in contract for two years is a good deal, it's not, you pay far more