Why is the pixel 2 even part of this conversation? Are we discussing the takata air bags of oled screens?
But following your logic every pixel 2 screen has issues, which clearly isn’t the case.
We are discussing when a problem can be called out for what it is. According to you, since you and so many users do not experience a slowdown the issue does not exist and we are imagining planned obsolescence
Touch Disease has not happened on my iPhone 6 or many other customers. Apple has not admitted the design flaw. This means Touch Disease is not a problem with iPhone 6 as there are customers with unaffected phones.
So are the affected customers wrong in saying Touch Disease is a a factual design flaw in the product?
There are many Pixel 2 XL on Reddit who supposedly have perfect screens with zero issues in contrast to those who are on their 5th RMA and still not getting a good unit. Google has not admitted any flaw. This must mean that the Pixel 2 screen issues do not exist and the affected customers are just unlucky and should switch to iOS. Google is not at fault and the same screens should be used next year on Pixel 3.
So are the affected users wrong in saying the Pixel 2 XL doesn’t have a good screen?
As regards the S8 there seem to be many users who have gotten a pink tinted screen. But surprise there are equally so many customers who got a perfect screen and sales have broken records. This means the pink tint is not an issue
So are the affected users wrong in stating Pink tint is an issue?
Likewise there seem to be many users who are troubled by the iOS slowdown every year. However seems there are many customers who don’t experience any speed decrease. This must mean speed decline year over year is not an issue.
So we are wrong in stating iOS slowdown ever year is an issue?
[doublepost=1511380782][/doublepost]
My son admitted to dropping his; but Apple replaced the phone anyway.
That’s not the point. The point is how ridiculous the assertion is. They are not admitting a flaw in their own product. There’s hardly anyone who even uses iPhone caseless and if a case is used the phone is well protected.
[doublepost=1511429301][/doublepost]
You know updates are optional right? If you want to stick with 4 year old OS you can.
[doublepost=1511386469][/doublepost]
My 5 year old MacBook Air doesn’t run high sierra as well as my 2.5 year old MacBook Pro.
Why am I not shocked?
Actually no they aren’t for the typical customer. Apple forces the update on you. I have kept my iPad Pro on iOS 10 and Apple auto downloaded the update in the background multiple times despite me having never visited the check for updates menu.
Once while I finished my work and went to home screen the dialog popped up and I almost pressed OK in a hurry. If this happens while you are away from your device, that pop up also has a timer so it will install the update automatically This is despite deleting the update once it downloaded in the storage previously. It does it again in a couple of days.
The only way to stop it is to download a tvOS beta profile and do a hard reset and even then that red badge will continue to remain on the settings icon. The average customer probably doesn’t even know the update can be deleted through the storage menu so good luck explaining all this to him.
[doublepost=1511430256][/doublepost]
An iPhone 5 from 2012 slowing down on an update from 2016 is not surprising....
What is surprising is when devices that are only around a year old slowing down.
That device slowed down every year since 2012 by a miniscule amount while it was only in 2016 that it was extremely noticeable.
I completely disagree with this notion that all electronics absolutely must slow down after a few years. My Windows installation is running into years and because I take extremely good care of it, it still boots in 15 seconds and is extremely snappy and that installation has seen Windows 7,8 and 10. Apple should give an option to “geeks” like me who want to go back to an OS I like at least for a year after the next update launches.
When I buy a phone I pay for the performance and battery life which was advertised to me. If later on it slows down, I have the right to downgrade back to the performance I paid for. I don’t give a damn about these charts they post.
[doublepost=1511431137][/doublepost]
The point of a software updated is to update software, which can contain security, performance, new apis etc. It's the same for every operating system, including windows, where things break and users aren't happy etc.
I'm not sure which yardstick is being used as a basis for this comment.
Yes and the update should let users go back if they do not like it and allow them to revisit it later. Windows 8- Windows 10 upgrade actually goes one step further. On upgrading, it actually states I can roll back to the previous version If I want to in a pop up.