Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,074
19,069
US
Really? I have had the opposite experience. Maybe its slowed down a little, but considering its from 2014 and has new features I think its pretty good.
that has been my experience as well...it runs great on 10.3.3 but not so great on IOS 11.
But now i get reminded constantly to update my ipad......but if I do it will slow to a crawl again. I was lucky in that i found a IOS 10.3.3 signed IPSW and was able to downgrade back from IOS 11. Apple only signs those files for a very short time. So after then you are stuck on IOS 11 with no way to get back to IOS 10.3.3 where the device ran smoothly.
 

Puddled

macrumors 6502a
Jun 9, 2017
548
602
An iPhone 5 from 2012 slowing down on an update from 2016 is not surprising....

Hang on though. The point of a software update is to improve the user experience not degrade it. If you are knowingly issuing updates which make the user experience worse, you are guilty as charged.

Aside from the clusterf*ck that was the 2012 N7, all of the updates I've had on my android devices have only ever improved the user experience and made the device quicker. Android 6 on my S6 was a revelation.

Apple fans point to android updates and mock the length of time the manufacturers issue major updates for. It's 2 years as opposed to Apples 4. However, this doesnt take into consideration the granular nature of android. Most core updates are done through the play store. Security updates are done (more frequently than apple btw) monthly.

The major android update is a huge undertaking both for the issuer and the device.

The 2012 N7 fell apart because of lollypop. I think that showed google that large updates are not necessarily a good thing and made google limit major updates to around 3 itterations.

In effect google and android choose to preserve the user experience rather than degrade it. Apple does not.


What is surprising is when devices that are only around a year old slowing down.
That is a bad OS and speaks of deeper problems in Apple's software group.
 

Zaft

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2009
4,570
4,049
Brooklyn, NY
Hang on though. The point of a software update is to improve the user experience not degrade it. If you are knowingly issuing updates which make the user experience worse, you are guilty as charged.

I dont really have an issue with a 4 year phone slowing down. Most people have bought a new one by then.

Technology moves so fast that 4 years is more like 8 years as far as tech goes.
 

Technarchy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2012
6,753
4,927

I do if it is caused by a needless software update issued by my OEM.


You know updates are optional right? If you want to stick with 4 year old OS you can.
[doublepost=1511386469][/doublepost]
I dont really have an issue with a 4 year phone slowing down. Most people have bought a new one by then.

Technology moves so fast that 4 years is more like 8 years as far as tech goes.

My 5 year old MacBook Air doesn’t run high sierra as well as my 2.5 year old MacBook Pro.

Why am I not shocked?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bruinsrme and FFR

Zaft

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2009
4,570
4,049
Brooklyn, NY
You know updates are optional right? If you want to stick with 4 year old OS you can.
[doublepost=1511386469][/doublepost]

My 5 year old MacBook Air doesn’t run high sierra as well as my 2.5 year old MacBook Pro.

Why am I not shocked?
You can but alot of Apps would not work.
 

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,074
19,069
US
You know updates are optional right?
Not really...is there a way to turn off the update notifications and constant pop up reminders? Then if you don't want the big update can you still get any security updates after that? Or are the updates after that dependent on installing the big OS update?
 
  • Like
Reactions: koigirl

widgeteer

Suspended
Jun 12, 2016
1,565
4,610
sure they are...why would they not be? User feedback is exactly how data is gathered. Companies spend a huge amount of money to gather user feedback.
Users....report the problems to begin with.....

This isn't user feedback. It's anonymous people vaguely asserting something sucks. It's why not all polls are treated equally. This forum, and others like it, thrive on confirmation bias. That's not reliable data. And as I've pointed out, why do your experiences trump ours with iOS devices? Why does Apple's customer satisfaction scores rank so highly?

The fact that you and others keep insisting that your posts serve as truth, but others don't because they don't agree with your experiences, should tell you this isn't reliable data.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
Hang on though. The point of a software update is to improve the user experience not degrade it. If you are knowingly issuing updates which make the user experience worse, you are guilty as charged.
The point of a software updated is to update software, which can contain security, performance, new apis etc. It's the same for every operating system, including windows, where things break and users aren't happy etc.

That is a bad OS and speaks of deeper problems in Apple's software group.
I'm not sure which yardstick is being used as a basis for this comment.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
Why is the pixel 2 even part of this conversation? Are we discussing the takata air bags of oled screens?

But following your logic every pixel 2 screen has issues, which clearly isn’t the case.
We are discussing when a problem can be called out for what it is. According to you, since you and so many users do not experience a slowdown the issue does not exist and we are imagining planned obsolescence

Touch Disease has not happened on my iPhone 6 or many other customers. Apple has not admitted the design flaw. This means Touch Disease is not a problem with iPhone 6 as there are customers with unaffected phones.

So are the affected customers wrong in saying Touch Disease is a a factual design flaw in the product?

There are many Pixel 2 XL on Reddit who supposedly have perfect screens with zero issues in contrast to those who are on their 5th RMA and still not getting a good unit. Google has not admitted any flaw. This must mean that the Pixel 2 screen issues do not exist and the affected customers are just unlucky and should switch to iOS. Google is not at fault and the same screens should be used next year on Pixel 3.

So are the affected users wrong in saying the Pixel 2 XL doesn’t have a good screen?

As regards the S8 there seem to be many users who have gotten a pink tinted screen. But surprise there are equally so many customers who got a perfect screen and sales have broken records. This means the pink tint is not an issue

So are the affected users wrong in stating Pink tint is an issue?

Likewise there seem to be many users who are troubled by the iOS slowdown every year. However seems there are many customers who don’t experience any speed decrease. This must mean speed decline year over year is not an issue.

So we are wrong in stating iOS slowdown ever year is an issue?

[doublepost=1511380782][/doublepost]
My son admitted to dropping his; but Apple replaced the phone anyway.

That’s not the point. The point is how ridiculous the assertion is. They are not admitting a flaw in their own product. There’s hardly anyone who even uses iPhone caseless and if a case is used the phone is well protected.
[doublepost=1511429301][/doublepost]
You know updates are optional right? If you want to stick with 4 year old OS you can.
[doublepost=1511386469][/doublepost]

My 5 year old MacBook Air doesn’t run high sierra as well as my 2.5 year old MacBook Pro.

Why am I not shocked?
Actually no they aren’t for the typical customer. Apple forces the update on you. I have kept my iPad Pro on iOS 10 and Apple auto downloaded the update in the background multiple times despite me having never visited the check for updates menu.
Once while I finished my work and went to home screen the dialog popped up and I almost pressed OK in a hurry. If this happens while you are away from your device, that pop up also has a timer so it will install the update automatically This is despite deleting the update once it downloaded in the storage previously. It does it again in a couple of days.

The only way to stop it is to download a tvOS beta profile and do a hard reset and even then that red badge will continue to remain on the settings icon. The average customer probably doesn’t even know the update can be deleted through the storage menu so good luck explaining all this to him.
[doublepost=1511430256][/doublepost]
An iPhone 5 from 2012 slowing down on an update from 2016 is not surprising....

What is surprising is when devices that are only around a year old slowing down.
That device slowed down every year since 2012 by a miniscule amount while it was only in 2016 that it was extremely noticeable.

I completely disagree with this notion that all electronics absolutely must slow down after a few years. My Windows installation is running into years and because I take extremely good care of it, it still boots in 15 seconds and is extremely snappy and that installation has seen Windows 7,8 and 10. Apple should give an option to “geeks” like me who want to go back to an OS I like at least for a year after the next update launches.

When I buy a phone I pay for the performance and battery life which was advertised to me. If later on it slows down, I have the right to downgrade back to the performance I paid for. I don’t give a damn about these charts they post.
[doublepost=1511431137][/doublepost]
The point of a software updated is to update software, which can contain security, performance, new apis etc. It's the same for every operating system, including windows, where things break and users aren't happy etc.


I'm not sure which yardstick is being used as a basis for this comment.
Yes and the update should let users go back if they do not like it and allow them to revisit it later. Windows 8- Windows 10 upgrade actually goes one step further. On upgrading, it actually states I can roll back to the previous version If I want to in a pop up.
 
Last edited:

jamezr

macrumors P6
Aug 7, 2011
16,074
19,069
US
This isn't user feedback. It's anonymous people vaguely asserting something sucks. It's why not all polls are treated equally. This forum, and others like it, thrive on confirmation bias. That's not reliable data. And as I've pointed out, why do your experiences trump ours with iOS devices? Why does Apple's customer satisfaction scores rank so highly?

The fact that you and others keep insisting that your posts serve as truth, but others don't because they don't agree with your experiences, should tell you this isn't reliable data.
Sure it is customer feedback....people reporting their use cases and problems. Go to the iphone section after every IOS release or new product release. Customers are there giving feedback. Everyone does it here constantly about new phones.....people giving feedback.....You might choose to see the something suck post...but not all of them are like that.

Then....what does this post of mine have to do with Apple customer satisfaction scores? No one has mentioned that at all.
Kinda starting to move the goals posts and change the context a little.

Then who said anything about my experiences trumping yours....why does your opinion trump mine? That a useless analogy.
If you are looking for truth.....stay off the internet and online forums.....

My assertion was there is a great amount of good user feedback in these forums about software and hardware. Companies like Apple have teams that gather this information for sites like this and others like Reddit and other social media.

Where do you think problems get reported and make it to the media outlets? It starts with people who use the products and post their problems in forums just like this one.
 

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
We are discussing when a problem can be called out for what it is. According to you, since you and so many users do not experience a slowdown the issue does not exist and we are imagining planned obsolescence

Touch Disease has not happened on my iPhone 6 or many other customers. Apple has not admitted the design flaw. This means Touch Disease is not a problem with iPhone 6 as there are customers with unaffected phones.

So are the affected customers wrong in saying Touch Disease is a a factual design flaw in the product?

There are many Pixel 2 XL on Reddit who supposedly have perfect screens with zero issues in contrast to those who are on their 5th RMA and still not getting a good unit. Google has not admitted any flaw. This must mean that the Pixel 2 screen issues do not exist and the affected customers are just unlucky and should switch to iOS. Google is not at fault and the same screens should be used next year on Pixel 3.

So are the affected users wrong in saying the Pixel 2 XL doesn’t have a good screen?

As regards the S8 there seem to be many users who have gotten a pink tinted screen. But surprise there are equally so many customers who got a perfect screen and sales have broken records. This means the pink tint is not an issue

So are the affected users wrong in stating Pink tint is an issue?

Likewise there seem to be many users who are troubled by the iOS slowdown every year. However seems there are many customers who don’t experience any speed decrease. This must mean speed decline year over year is not an issue.

So we are wrong in stating iOS slowdown ever year is an issue?
You are mixing and matching narratives to suit an agenda.
Actually engineering issues
- Takata air bags are an issue
- Note 7 was an issue and Samsung admitted it through a recall
- Apple over the years has fixed various things under warranty(screen separation, 6s battery warranty, chargers etc)
- Pink screen
- Apple off-axis blue tint
Internet Memes
- Proof of planned obsolescence
- Proof of slowdown of IOS devices with every update (especially since a study confirmed not)
- Proof that IOS Purposely Slowed Down the Home Button on the I7
- Bendgate
- Touch Disease

Coming from factory quality control, I know there always is a small sample size defect rate. There is a difference between saying a manufactured unit may have a defect and apple is purposely slowing down older devices to increase sales. Most of these posts cite the latter meme.

Yes and the update should let users go back if they do not like it and allow them to revisit it later. Windows 8- Windows 10 upgrade actually goes one step further. On upgrading, it actually states I can roll back to the previous version If I want to in a pop up.
You have to talk to apple about this. Apples social media department has probably heard this a lot, but maybe not enough of the customers want to roll-back so there is no incentive for apple to provide that capability. The fact the Microsoft allows you to roll-back is another good reason for windows/android.
 

dotnet

macrumors 68000
Apr 10, 2015
1,666
1,390
Sydney, Australia
Where do you think problems get reported and make it to the media outlets? It starts with people who use the products and post their problems in forums just like this one.

I'm sure this matters a little, but I think a far more meaningful statistic for Apple is the ringing of coins in their cash registers, and the complaints about product issues (real or imaginary) received at the Genius Bar and other support channels.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tbayrgs

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
Sure it is customer feedback....people reporting their use cases and problems. Go to the iphone section after every IOS release or new product release. Customers are there giving feedback. Everyone does it here constantly about new phones.....people giving feedback.....You might choose to see the something suck post...but not all of them are like that.

Then....what does this post of mine have to do with Apple customer satisfaction scores? No one has mentioned that at all.
Kinda starting to move the goals posts and change the context a little.

Then who said anything about my experiences trumping yours....why does your opinion trump mine? That a useless analogy.
If you are looking for truth.....stay off the internet and online forums.....

My assertion was there is a great amount of good user feedback in these forums about software and hardware. Companies like Apple have teams that gather this information for sites like this and others like Reddit and other social media.

Where do you think problems get reported and make it to the media outlets? It starts with people who use the products and post their problems in forums just like this one.
I am sure apple has very sophisticated systems and processes that deal with social media. Since they are secretive we will likely never know what these systems and processes are. But when they say something is implemented "based on customer feedback" one has to wonder how and where that customer feedback was actually harvested by apple; e.g. ability to delete apple apps. Then again they may have made some hard and fast policy decisions that short of a massive defection from apple won't cause them to reverse. An example of this is downgrading IOS outside of the window. And lastly someone saying their device is hasn't slowed or their device has slowed.

No one knows apple's internal QA process (while many assume apple let's users beta test in production, that obviously is not the case). My opinion is they have internal processes and measurements that measure performance across a range of variables and they do strive to hit certain benchmarks. And release the updates once those benchmarks are met.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
You are mixing and matching narratives to suit an agenda.
Actually engineering issues
- Takata air bags are an issue
- Note 7 was an issue and Samsung admitted it through a recall
- Apple over the years has fixed various things under warranty(screen separation, 6s battery warranty, chargers etc)
- Pink screen
- Apple off-axis blue tint
I am making a very simple point in all those examples I listed. An issue does not need to be experienced by everyone in order to confirm whether an issues exist. The existence of a Pixel 2 XL with a perfect display does not imply that the issue does not exist. It simply means that the owner of that particular unit doesn't have any issue. The owner of the faculty unit even after 5 RMAs and 6 hours worth of call backs with Google, has every right to claim that the displays on the Pixel are a problem because he has factually experienced it. The countless mentions on the screen issues in so many reviews only bring this point home

- Proof of planned obsolescence
Your perfect device does not invalidate the existence of my slow device. My device has been slowed down and this has been observed by me on multiple devices over the course of many years. Yearly I experience slowdown. With the inability to downgrade to a previous OS and after paying money for a battery replacement after 2 years planned obsolescence is a fact to me and the countless other customers who experience slowdown every year.


- Proof of slowdown of IOS devices with every update (especially since a study confirmed not)
That study did not disprove anything as has been said earlier because it was never claimed geekbench scooted will decrease with updates. I have a GTX 260 from 2009 lying somewhere in my drawer and that GPU still scores the same in 2017 as it did in 2009. Good luck running anything 2017 on it though.

- Proof that IOS Purposely Slowed Down the Home Button on the I7
I do not need your acknowledgement on this issue. I suffer from this issue every day when I use the device and to me Apple has markedly degraded he experience on iOS 11.

- Bendgate
- Touch Disease
Both of these issues haven't occurred with me but I acknowledge they do exist as a fact because of sommany customers affected by it.

Coming from factory quality control, I know there always is a small sample size defect rate. There is a difference between saying a manufactured unit may have a defect and apple is purposely slowing down older devices to increase sales. Most of these posts cite the latter meme.
With the Pixel there is no small sample defect rate. There's too many defective devices out there. The example of the Pixel was introduced only to indicate that the existence of some perfect unit does not in any way imply that the problems do not exist.

Also Apple doesn't need to "purposely" do any thing. They develop a newer OS and optimise it for newer hardware and backport it to the older ones without dialling down the demanding features or effects. This results in a slower phone.

You have to talk to apple about this. Apples social media department has probably heard this a lot, but maybe not enough of the customers want to roll-back so there is no incentive for apple to provide that capability. The fact the Microsoft allows you to roll-back is another good reason for windows/android.

Or maybe it doesn't fit in their business plan.
 

dotnet

macrumors 68000
Apr 10, 2015
1,666
1,390
Sydney, Australia
Also Apple doesn't need to "purposely" do any thing. They develop a newer OS and optimise it for newer hardware and backport it to the older ones without dialling down the demanding features or effects. This results in a slower phone.

Now there's a change of tack from the "planned obsolescence coercing users into upgrading" conspiracy theory. Progress, I suppose. And I thought this thread would never amount to anything...
 
  • Like
Reactions: I7guy

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
I am making a very simple point in all those examples I listed. An issue does not need to be experienced by everyone in order to confirm whether an issues exist. The existence of a Pixel 2 XL with a perfect display does not imply that the issue does not exist. It simply means that the owner of that particular unit doesn't have any issue. The owner of the faculty unit even after 5 RMAs and 6 hours worth of call backs with Google, has every right to claim that the displays on the Pixel are a problem because he has factually experienced it. The countless mentions on the screen issues in so many reviews only bring this point home
In order to define there "is an issue" it has to be measured. There is no definitive measurement to prove apple slows it's devices down. A study even supported that apple doesn't. This is very different than saying everything manufactured under the sun on earth it's expected there is a sample size with defects and/or poor quality control. 100% perfection is not the way of the world, but taken the other way, none of what you say can be measured or proved or even benchmarks agreed on.

Your perfect device does not invalidate the existence of my slow device. My device has been slowed down and this has been observed by me on multiple devices over the course of many years. Yearly I experience slowdown. With the inability to downgrade to a previous OS and after paying money for a battery replacement after 2 years planned obsolescence is a fact to me and the countless other customers who experience slowdown every year.
I don't have a "perfect" device, I have a device that functions normally for day to day use. If you are looking for a "perfect" device you will never find one. Perfect is subjective anyway, which is why these threads are expansive.

That study did not disprove anything as has been said earlier because it was never claimed geekbench scooted will decrease with updates. I have a GTX 260 from 2009 lying somewhere in my drawer and that GPU still scores the same in 2017 as it did in 2009. Good luck running anything 2017 on it though.
Sure it did; it disproved the notion that apple slows down older devices. You may not like the outcome of the study, or disagree with it. But it's there.

I do not need your acknowledgement on this issue. I suffer from this issue every day when I use the device and to me Apple has markedly degraded he experience on iOS 11.
And conversely, your anecdotal experience doesn't matter to me and is not germane to making an unproven generalization. You can claim anything you want and through the largesse of MR can express that thought. Other posters can express their views as well. And here we are, again.

Both of these issues haven't occurred with me but I acknowledge they do exist as a fact because of sommany customers affected by it.
Sure, as internet memes they do exist. Phones bend and if handled roughly will break. Again, going back to 100% perfect manufacture there may be a small percentage of phones that don't take as much abuse due to manufacture. That is way different than the internet meme suggests.

With the Pixel there is no small sample defect rate. There's too many defective devices out there. The example of the Pixel was introduced only to indicate that the existence of some perfect unit does not in any way imply that the problems do not exist.
Can you tell me the stats on this, so I can determine what "small" is by my definition. Or are generalizations going to be made based on reddit?

Also Apple doesn't need to "purposely" do any thing. They develop a newer OS and optimise it for newer hardware and backport it to the older ones without dialling down the demanding features or effects. This results in a slower phone.
Apple, according to some, does need to do something. It's been proven older phones don't slow down but there is that feedback button.

Or maybe it doesn't fit in their business plan.
Again, ask apple. It seems just putting things out on an internet forum is not enough to get apple to make certain changes.
[doublepost=1511448543][/doublepost]
Now there's a change of tack from the "planned obsolescence coercing users into upgrading" conspiracy theory. Progress, I suppose. And I thought this thread would never amount to anything...
I nearly choked on my coffee when I read this. Well done....
 

Puddled

macrumors 6502a
Jun 9, 2017
548
602
In order to define there "is an issue" it has to be measured. There is no definitive measurement to prove apple slows it's devices down. A study even supported that apple doesn't. This is very different than saying everything manufactured under the sun on earth it's expected there is a sample size with defects and/or poor quality control. 100% perfection is not the way of the world, but taken the other way, none of what you say can be measured or proved or even benchmarks agreed on.

You seem to be just ignoring previous responses to this and recycling your old arguments.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
Now there's a change of tack from the "planned obsolescence coercing users into upgrading" conspiracy theory. Progress, I suppose. And I thought this thread would never amount to anything...

Uh The lack of optimisation for old devices forces users into upgrading

In order to define there "is an issue" it has to be measured. There is no definitive measurement to prove apple slows it's devices down.
The best measurement is myself when I use my device in the real world and that's where it lags. Google did not need a lab test on the Pixel 2 screen when they raised the warranty to 2 years. Those "Small sample size defect" phones were all they needed

A study even supported that apple doesn't
The study supported that Apple did not slow the hardware inside the phone. It does not refute the claim that they don's slow the phone itself.

100% perfection is not the way of the world, but taken the other way, none of what you say can be measured or proved or even benchmarks agreed on.
I am not out to convince you. I am saying just don't call me a liar when I say planned obsolescence exists. Every device I upgrade has it.

Sure it did; it disproved the notion that apple slows down older devices. You may not like the outcome of the study, or disagree with it. But it's there.
I don't disagree with it. I never claimed Apple slowed down the hardware inside a phone


And conversely, your anecdotal experience doesn't matter to me and is not germane to making an unproven generalization.
Then stop quoting me with your perfect devices which increase in speed with every upgrade because mine don't and my claim based on what I experience isn't invalidated by your devices.

My phones slow down compared to the launch iOS version. You can throw your claims of your perfect devices till you are blue in the face. It wont change a thing on what I experience and what I know is happening with my device



Sure, as internet memes they do exist. Phones bend and if handled roughly will break.
The structure of the iPhone 6 Plus was slightly weak. It was corrected in the 6s with the 7000 series aluminium. Similarly I expect the Pixel 3 will have a flawless screen despite the small size defect rate

Can you tell me the stats on this, so I can determine what "small" is by my definition. Or are generalizations going to be made based on reddit?
Yes. Read pretty much any review on the phone. Its also the only phone on the market with a 2 year warranty thanks to the small sample size defect rate complains


Apple, according to some, does need to do something. It's been proven older phones don't slow down
Its proven the hardware inside the phone does not slow down.

Again, ask apple. It seems just putting things out on an internet forum is not enough to get apple to make certain changes.
I am not going to waste my time on that. I am keeping my iDevices on the launch version of the OS. It works for me. I lose out on the features but I prioritise performance over features anyway.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Regime2008

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
Uh The lack of optimisation for old devices forces users into upgrading
Again ani Her baseless statement that can’t be proved.

The best measurement is myself when I use my device in the real world and that's where it lags. Google did not need a lab test on the Pixel 2 screen when they raised the warranty to 2 years. Those "Small sample size defect" phones were all they needed
Okay anecdotally speaking, no problem with that.

The study supported that Apple did not slow the hardware inside the phone. It does not refute the claim that they don's slow the phone itself.
Not quite what the conclusion was.


I am not out to convince you. I am saying just don't call me a liar when I say planned obsolescence exists. Every device I upgrade has it.
Nobody has called any names so dont spin this. The facts don’t lend themselves to the conclusions being drawn. If anecdotally you want to believe it, go ahead. But when you post a generalization as fact be prepared to have a discussion.

I don't disagree with it. I never claimed Apple slowed down the hardware inside a phone
Don’t even know what these means? Underclock the cpu and gay? Is that what isnyou are implying?

Then stop quoting me with your perfect devices which increase in speed with every upgrade because mine don't and my claim based on what I experience isn't invalidated by your devices.
Then stop posting with your problem laden devices. Really? Only your experience matters, others that may have the opposite experience don’t count?

My phones slow down compared to the launch iOS version. You can throw your claims of your perfect devices till you are blue in the face. It wont change a thing on what I experience and what I know is happening with my device
My phones get faster as Apple tunes the o/s further. You can claim all you want till the cows come home but it doesn’t change my experience. See how this works?

The structure of the iPhone 6 Plus was slightly weak. It was corrected in the 6s with the 7000 series aluminium. Similarly I expect the Pixel 3 will have a flawless screen despite the small size defect rate
What does this even mean? The phone is not indestructible?

Yes. Read pretty much any review on the phone. Its also the only phone on the market with a 2 year warranty thanks to the small sample size defect rate complains
Those are not stats.

Apple, according to some, does need to do something. It's been proven older phones don't slow down but there is that feedback button.
You need to talk to Apple. Posting in anonymous Internet forums doesn’t seem to work. As far as the feedback button use it liberally.

I am not going to waste my time on that. I am keeping my iDevices on the launch version of the OS. It works for me. I lose out on the features but I prioritise performance over features.
I prioritize both equally, a superior performing subpar feature phone does not cut it. Apple delivers features and performance with each update as shown throughout the years.
 

Radon87000

macrumors 604
Nov 29, 2013
7,777
6,255
Again ani Her baseless statement that can’t be proved.
Proven with the people I know and myself. A sale is a sale which would not have happened had they optimised for older devices.


Not quite what the conclusion was.
That article was entirely full of CPU and GPU benchmarks when it was never claimed those are lower over time. We are talking real world usage which can differ from what benchmarks indicate. Edge scores lower than Chrome in benchmarks. Real world usage its much smoother.


Nobody has called any names so dont spin this.
I was told I was imagining things. So I simply converted what was being implied into a word. I was also told Apple slowing down devices is a false statement when my devices are a living contradiction of that. Yes I do agree the hardware inside the phone or tablet hasn't slowed down

The facts don’t lend themselves to the conclusions being drawn. If anecdotally you want to believe it, go ahead. But when you post a generalization as fact be prepared to have a discussion.
I have posted this much earlier. If you are happy with your device,great. However when we say devices are slowed down based on user feedback as well as out own, don't quote us and say we are wrong.

Don’t even know what these means? Underclock the cpu and gay? Is that what isnyou are implying?
The only way those benchmark scores can be lowered in Futuremark tests is if Apple intentionally underclocks the CPU like in low power mode. This was never claimed to be the issue in the first place so that study proved something which was never disputed in the first place

10 years from now my Dell laptop will score the same on whatever version of Windows is at that time. Its not going to be usable though if I try running 2027 software on it.

Then stop posting with your problem laden devices. Really? Only your experience matters, others that may have the opposite experience don’t count?
You have your own experiences. However when we are called out for claiming planned obsolescence and accused of imagining things you can bet we are going to go deep on this.

Why do you have an issue when we say our phones slow down yearly and Apple doesnt offer a way out?


What does this even mean? The phone is not indestructible?
That bendgate was a thing. I did not have the issue but apparently many did with regular use and which was ;ater fixed


Those are not stats.
Those were the very reviews which forced Google into coming out with a 2 year warranty and optimising Android for no burn in with a changed nav bar the moment these issues surfaced. They may not have satisfied you but they got the job done which is to say there was problem.

You need to talk to Apple. Posting in anonymous Internet forums doesn’t seem to work. As far as the feedback button use it liberally.
Apple's probably going to say "I can't hear you over all this money raining down". I have found a way out which works. I am going to use it. That feedback app is a joke. I am not getting my issues addressed despite posting in it. Screw it.


I prioritize both equally, a superior performing subpar feature phone does not cut it. Apple delivers features and performance with each update as shown throughout the years.

We have very different priorities. The features I gained in iOS 11 were not worth the reduced battery life and the lag. I would downgrade in an instant if I could. My iPad is perfect. Sadly I am stuck with iOS 11 on the iphone. It was moronic of me to believe Apple would fix my issues in a later release which is why I didn't downgrade in the usual timeframe when it was still being signed. Whats done is done anyway.
 
Last edited:

I7guy

macrumors Nehalem
Nov 30, 2013
35,156
25,262
Gotta be in it to win it
Proven with the people I know and myself. A sale is a sale which would not have happened had they optimised for older devices.
Not proven for the masses, the reason has been covered previously. It’s great you know the absolute reason for three out of hundreds of millions of consumers.

That article was entirely full of CPU and GPU benchmarks when it was never claimed those are lower over time. We are talking real world usage which can differ from what benchmarks indicate. Edge scores lower than Chrome in benchmarks. Real world usage its much smoother.
It takes software to run hardware andnwhatnwas proven is the o/s does not slow down doing actual work.

I was told I was imagining things. So I simply converted what was being implied into a word. I was also told Apple slowing down devices is a false statement when my devices are a living contradiction of that. Yes I do agree the hardware inside the phone or tablet hasn't slowed down
I was told I wasn’t seeing things that are there. Eventually I figured out I wasn’t seeing them because they weren’t there. I was told my devices must be slower because it is fact Apple slows down devices with future ios updates.

I have posted this much earlier. If you are happy with your device,great. However when we say devices are slowed down based on user feedback as well as out own, don't quote us and say we are wrong.
Well same here. When users are quoted saying their devices are faster, don’t quote is and say we are wrong or we aren’t seeing things that aren’t there.

The only way those benchmark scores can be lowered in Futuremark tests is if Apple intentionally underclocks the CPU like in low power mode. This was never claimed to be the issue in the first place so that study proved something which was never disputed in the first place
This was covered above.

10 years from now my Dell laptop will score the same on whatever version of Windows is at that time. Its not going to be usable though if I try running 2027 software on it.
Pc world already proved that hypothesis false.


You have your own experiences. However when we are called out for claiming planned obsolescence and accused of imagining things you can bet we are going to go deep on this.
The onus is on you p/o guys for proving this.

Why do you have an issue when we say our phones slow down yearly and Apple doesnt offer a way out?
This is something that needs to be addressed with Apple. You can post all you want but in 10 years Apple hasn’t changed. Ought to say something.

That bendgate was a thing. I did not have the issue but apparently many did with regular use and which was ;ater fixed
Bendgare was a meme.

Those were the very reviews which forced Google into coming out with a 2 year warranty and optimising Android for no burn in with a changed nav bar the moment these issues surfaced. They may not have satisfied you but they got the job done which is to say there was problem.
This was a manufacturing issue as discussed in a previous post, unlike “bendgate” which is a meme.

Apple's probably going to say "I can't hear you over all this money raining down". I have found a way out which works. I am going to use it. That feedback app is a joke. I am not getting my issues addressed despite posting in it. Screw it.
People have been saying don’t get worked up over a phone when there are alternatives out there.

We have very different priorities. The features I gained in iOS 11 were not worth the reduced battery life and the lag. I would downgrade in an instant if I could. My iPad is perfect. Sadly I am stuck with iOS 11 on the iphone. It was moronic of me to believe Apple would fix my issues in a later release which is why I didn't downgrade in the usual timeframe when it was still being signed. Whats done is done anyway.
Yes it seems. I need the latest features with an o/s that works well. You could care less about features as long as the o/s worksnthe way you want. We all sacrifice nuances of perfection, the question is which nuances is one willing to sacrifice.
 

Zaft

macrumors 601
Jun 16, 2009
4,570
4,049
Brooklyn, NY
We are discussing when a problem can be called out for what it is. According to you, since you and so many users do not experience a slowdown the issue does not exist and we are imagining planned obsolescence

Touch Disease has not happened on my iPhone 6 or many other customers. Apple has not admitted the design flaw. This means Touch Disease is not a problem with iPhone 6 as there are customers with unaffected phones.

So are the affected customers wrong in saying Touch Disease is a a factual design flaw in the product?

There are many Pixel 2 XL on Reddit who supposedly have perfect screens with zero issues in contrast to those who are on their 5th RMA and still not getting a good unit. Google has not admitted any flaw. This must mean that the Pixel 2 screen issues do not exist and the affected customers are just unlucky and should switch to iOS. Google is not at fault and the same screens should be used next year on Pixel 3.

So are the affected users wrong in saying the Pixel 2 XL doesn’t have a good screen?

As regards the S8 there seem to be many users who have gotten a pink tinted screen. But surprise there are equally so many customers who got a perfect screen and sales have broken records. This means the pink tint is not an issue

So are the affected users wrong in stating Pink tint is an issue?

Likewise there seem to be many users who are troubled by the iOS slowdown every year. However seems there are many customers who don’t experience any speed decrease. This must mean speed decline year over year is not an issue.

So we are wrong in stating iOS slowdown ever year is an issue?



That’s not the point. The point is how ridiculous the assertion is. They are not admitting a flaw in their own product. There’s hardly anyone who even uses iPhone caseless and if a case is used the phone is well protected.
[doublepost=1511429301][/doublepost]
Actually no they aren’t for the typical customer. Apple forces the update on you. I have kept my iPad Pro on iOS 10 and Apple auto downloaded the update in the background multiple times despite me having never visited the check for updates menu.
Once while I finished my work and went to home screen the dialog popped up and I almost pressed OK in a hurry. If this happens while you are away from your device, that pop up also has a timer so it will install the update automatically This is despite deleting the update once it downloaded in the storage previously. It does it again in a couple of days.

The only way to stop it is to download a tvOS beta profile and do a hard reset and even then that red badge will continue to remain on the settings icon. The average customer probably doesn’t even know the update can be deleted through the storage menu so good luck explaining all this to him.
[doublepost=1511430256][/doublepost]
That device slowed down every year since 2012 by a miniscule amount while it was only in 2016 that it was extremely noticeable.

I completely disagree with this notion that all electronics absolutely must slow down after a few years. My Windows installation is running into years and because I take extremely good care of it, it still boots in 15 seconds and is extremely snappy and that installation has seen Windows 7,8 and 10. Apple should give an option to “geeks” like me who want to go back to an OS I like at least for a year after the next update launches.

When I buy a phone I pay for the performance and battery life which was advertised to me. If later on it slows down, I have the right to downgrade back to the performance I paid for. I don’t give a damn about these charts they post.
[doublepost=1511431137][/doublepost]
Yes and the update should let users go back if they do not like it and allow them to revisit it later. Windows 8- Windows 10 upgrade actually goes one step further. On upgrading, it actually states I can roll back to the previous version If I want to in a pop up.
My wife’s MacBook Air from 2011 still runs pretty good actually. Battery is just very bad.
 

Deeds500

macrumors 6502
Aug 22, 2014
313
490
WRONG

I had an iPhone 7 Plus earlier, this year, and really liked it a lot. But certain frustration in iOS led me back to stock Android, but was thinking and hoping Apple would wake up and revise the needed stuff like Notifications in iOS 11, and come June, with the first iOS 11 beta, and NOTHING done to notifications, i sold my 7 Plus.

I think the iPhone could be even better, if certain things were revised in iOS is my point. Right now the iPhone X is an amazing hardware, just one of the best looking, best feeling smartphones on the market, but hot damn iOS feels so outdated in certain aspects. if Apple would address those issues, they can steel back millions more sales from Samsung, etc...

If Apple did this, I'd come back and never leave;

- Redo Notifications
- Allow default app settings change
- Ditch the need for iTunes
- Allow some basic form of customization: Dark Mode, Icon packs, more options to move stuff around the screen, like put apps on the bottom of the screen right above the Dock.
- Allow Widgets on the Home screen, allow user to decide where to put them.

And don't say, just tick with Android if the above is what you want. Well no, I still like the other stuff Apple does and has, like iMessage, and the smoothness of the Ui, the apps, etc...


This is so spot on I thought I was reading my own post.

2013 was the last real upgrade to ios and even that did not change the overall look of it.

The grid of apps may have been fresh and new in 2007, but it's now 2017 for goodness sakes. Over 10 years and still we cannot customise the home screen.

With the X i thought this would change. But it's simply old ui in new hardware. Looking at hardware is okay, but people use a phone for the software.

I'm starting to wonder if Apple will ever change it.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.