Ok, then what's your theory? Clearly we're spitballing here. It ends pretty quickly once Apple comes clean and at least admits they are investigating the problem.I find that extremely unbelievable.
Last edited:
Ok, then what's your theory? Clearly we're spitballing here. It ends pretty quickly once Apple comes clean and at least admits they are investigating the problem.I find that extremely unbelievable.
Ok, then what's your theory? Clearly we're spitballing here. It ends pretty quickly once Apple comes clean and at least admits they are investigating the problem.
All ears, let's see what you got.
Yeah, I concede your point, that’s why it’s so vexing.I don't know, it doesn't affect my phone, but is clearly an issue for many. I just think there is zero chance Apple put new antennas in and decided not to test them.
I'd say average.
-102 dbm is okay but not great.
-80 dbms is great
-90 dbms is good
Well I feel like a moron now and this explains a lot. I just discovered that AT&T unilaterally switched me to a lower tier plan capped at 3mbps some time in late September (it appears on 9/21) without my authorization and without notifying me after “ending” the completely unlimited uncapped unthrottled plan I’d continually used for over a decade from my Cingular days.
Of course, they now won’t switch me back to a true unlimited plan without me paying significantly more, so I’ll have to get the phone unlocked and switch to Verizon or T-Mobile (never going back to AT&T after this), but I’m hopeful that it will work fine after that.
Sorry for being an idiot and sending the investigation off on a tangent. Didn’t even think to check my AT&T account for changes since I’d been on the same true unlimited plan for over 10 years.
He doesn’t compare the XS/XR there though (or mention the XR at all as far as I can see): for all we know the XR could be driving the antenna with the same current as the XS to get its higher EIRP.
That I can agree with you on 100%.But here's the thing: Apple really needs to come out and communicate with us, the customer like....yesterday.
Guys, speed tests are great and all but really don’t tell us much. Even if you’re doing two phones side by side, it may mean less than you think.
Why? Band acquisition. You need to be sure that not only are they in the same place for these tests, use a tripod and do several tests, but, you need to be sure they’re pinging the same serves, and the big one: the same bands.
If your phone is getting crappy speeds on say band 41, and the other one is getting good ones on band 26, you’re not comparing apples to apples. And remember, some of the older phones don’t even receive some of the bands in use now.
So make sure you use field test mode on both to verify that as you’re testing and do multiple tests to help rule out variables.
Guys, speed tests are great and all but really don’t tell us much. Even if you’re doing two phones side by side, it may mean less than you think.
Why? Band acquisition. You need to be sure that not only are they in the same place for these tests, use a tripod and do several tests, but, you need to be sure they’re pinging the same serves, and the big one: the same bands.
If your phone is getting crappy speeds on say band 41, and the other one is getting good ones on band 26, you’re not comparing apples to apples. And remember, some of the older phones don’t even receive some of the bands in use now.
So make sure you use field test mode on both to verify that as you’re testing and do multiple tests to help rule out variables.
Hahaha....Well, despite my better judgment, I broke down and purchased an XS Max on Friday
Well.....I found this thread because I went to a concert on Saturday night with my Max. No reception. Yes, there were 20,000+ people there, but I haven't had reception issues at games or concerts in a few years. And it wasn't even indoors--I was under a pavilion in an amphitheater. Then on the bus today.......slow as molasses.
Verizon.
If they don't have a clear answer on this problem in a few days I'm trading it and getting a Note 9 for a change. I was thinking of doing that anyway. They actually use Qalcomm processors!
Love vanilla android but Pixel 3 is probably the ugly phone release this yr...I think the Pixel 3 when it comes out would be the best experience for iOS users looking to jump. I liked my pixel a lot and updates like iOS. I missed the iOS and iMessage/FaceTime though.
The Pixel 3 XL is the ugliest. The Pixel 3 regular looks like last year's Pixel 2 XL. No notch but still has front facing speakers.Love vanilla android but Pixel 3 is probably the ugly phone release this yr...
Love vanilla android but Pixel 3 is probably the ugly phone release this yr...
Thanks for the advice! Just finished unlocking my phone so that I can have some leverage when I call them.There's another option. Call AT&T retentions, tell them about this incident, and tell that that you're leaving unless they put you on the Unlimited Plus plan and give you a $10 monthly credit. Note that I listed the Unlimited Plus plan, not the newer Unlimited Choice or Unlimited &More plans. The older plus plan costs more for one device, but additional devices are way cheaper. They still have access to the old plan and can put you on it. Retentions can do a lot that the mainline customer service people can't.
Absolutely, but it's a case of complete sink or swim in terms of placement, thickness etc. From an article I was Reading the pros and cons of stainless steel as a mobile device material:
(Listed under one of the "CONS" of steel)
Basically, any obstacle is bad for an antenna, metal is bad because conductors soak up and block the signal. Great if it's attached to your antenna, not so great if it's not. Especially bad for your incoming signal.
- RF transmission. This means your LTE, Wi-Fi, and Bluetooth signals. Radio frequencies of the safe variety have a tough time transmitting through dense material. This can mean your phone needs to have antenna lines or glass cutouts for the antennas.
It's interesting that the X uses steel. I think the Qualcom Intel thing was an intelligent place to look, but the fact they have a side by side test that proved they are roughly equal and why they likely aren't the culprit was satisfied for me here. -here's the quote from the link:
"The two 2017 iPhone X variants -- with Qualcomm base-band and with Intel base-band -- perform almost identically in RF testing submitted in their FCC authorization filings."
Same antenna, difference intel and qualcom, identical lab tests.
Also, the antenna (RF) performance of the X moderately was worse than the 8 series, but the hardware was basically the same on the antenna side of things.
So, maybe Apple figured since the RF performance of the antenna with steel was only incrementally worse, they didn't have to test the new chassis to see if the new 4x4mimo band addition to the antenna would be any different, but from what I gather, you can be surprised how adding something like that under enclosed conditions performs much worse or even much better. A lot to do with positioning etc.
So maybe it's a steel frame+ the 4x4mimo+ likely some software fine tuning, I don;t know how 4x4mimo works, but I don;t think they can tweak individual power to individual antenna bands, that would be the ideal software fix. I think they can only raise the overall power, which is maxed out already to the xs and xs max. Also stated in the article I linked.
All I'm saying is that not testing the new antenna live in the new chassis when you believe you've basically already done that is a believable scenario.
Oh well, but Apple decided that saving 0.99 cents on each phone by getting the modems from Intel is more important lolmost of the work a modem does is cancel out interference from neighboring devices. Qualcomm modems are better at it.
The metal phone body plus the inferior modem and you get bad performance in low signal situations since you still have a lot of interference from other people with phones.
Source/link? Would like to read more about this.most of the work a modem does is cancel out interference from neighboring devices. Qualcomm modems are better at it.
You're correct about the iPhone X last year. It has a stainless steel frame and chassis and it has good reception ratings based on those FCC documents. To me it's starting to look like 4x4 mimo antenna is the culprit. A few software tweaks could possibly help remedy the situation. I'm sure Apple seen the documents and findings but didn't realize the "real" world impact it would have.The X was made of steel. It worked fine. 11 more months. Yippee
Apple isnt going to do anything about this issue. I'm waiting for Tim Cook to pull a Steve Jobs and tell us to move into an area with better coverage.